Abel-Smith B
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1978 Winter;56(1):7-21.
By giving everyone paper rights to health care, Americans may end up doing little better, at much greater cost, and feeling worse about it. The key to providing greater equity may be to find a way of defining the minimum that all should have. Most countries somehow define these limits for publicly provided services from education to cash assistance. But for health care benefits there are no simple limiting criteria--especially when professionals have the exceptional luxury of using whatever resources they choose. A realistic floor requires toughly maintained ceilings.
赋予每个人享受医疗保健的书面权利,美国人最终可能收效甚微,成本却大幅增加,而且对此感觉更糟。实现更大公平性的关键可能在于找到一种界定所有人都应享有的最低标准的方法。大多数国家都以某种方式界定了从教育到现金援助等公共服务的这些限制。但对于医疗保健福利而言,却没有简单的限制标准——尤其是当专业人员享有使用他们所选择的任何资源这种格外奢侈的权利时。一个现实的底线需要严格维持上限。