Hasman Andreas
Ethox Centre, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, United Kingdom.
Health Care Anal. 2003 Mar;11(1):41-58. doi: 10.1023/A:1025385929559.
In this paper I review empirical methods applied in recent analysis of decision-making on priorities in health care. I outline a number of discrete methods and discuss their applicability and efficacy in the field of bioethics. Three key methodological issues seem to be important: choice of subject group; choice of approach and the extent of background information given to respondents. I conclude that a combination method is needed to give a comprehensive representation of values in priority setting and thus to meet the overall objectives of empirical ethics.
在本文中，我回顾了近期医疗保健优先事项决策分析中应用的实证方法。我概述了一些离散方法，并讨论了它们在生物伦理领域的适用性和有效性。三个关键的方法问题似乎很重要：主题组的选择；方法的选择以及向受访者提供的背景信息的程度。我得出结论，需要一种组合方法来全面呈现优先事项设定中的价值观，从而实现实证伦理学的总体目标。
