Suppr超能文献

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)管理中从长效抗胆碱能药物(LAMA)或吸入性糖皮质激素/长效β2受体激动剂(ICS/LABA)起始至启用三联联合治疗的升级时间:韩国真实世界使用中噻托溴铵与ICS/LABA发生率比较(CITRUS)研究的结果

Escalation Time to Open Triple Combination Therapy from the Initiation of LAMA versus ICS/LABA in COPD Management: Findings from Comparing the Incidence of Tiotropium and ICS/LABA in Real-World Use in South Korea (CITRUS) Study.

作者信息

Lee Ye Jin, Rhee Chin Kook, Hwang Yong Il, Yoo Kwang Ha, Lee So Eun, Lee Doik, Park Yong Bum, Kim Youlim

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.

Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2021 Dec 7;11(12):1325. doi: 10.3390/jpm11121325.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

bronchodilators are the key treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), however, inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs)/long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) are widely prescribed. We compared the escalation time to open triple combination therapy between long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonists (LAMA) and ICS/LABA in COPD management.

METHODS

this retrospective study included COPD patients selected from the National Health Insurance Service of South Korea from January 2005 to April 2015. The primary outcome was the escalation time to triple therapy in patients who initially received LAMA or ICS/LABA. Other outcomes included risk factors predisposing escalation to triple combination therapy.

RESULTS

a total of 2444 patients were assigned to the LAMA or ICS/LABA groups. The incidences of triple combination therapy in the LAMA and ICS/LABA groups were 81.0 and 139.8 per 1000 person-years, respectively ( < 0.001); the median times to triple therapy escalation were 281 and 207 days, respectively ( = 0.03). Treatment with ICS/LABA showed a higher risk of triple therapy escalation compared to LAMA (hazard ratio (HR), 1.601; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.402-1.829). The associated risk factor was male sex. (HR, 1.564; 95% CI, 1.352-1.809).

CONCLUSIONS

the initiation of COPD treatment with LAMA is associated with a reduced escalation time to triple therapy compared with ICS/LABA.

摘要

背景

支气管扩张剂是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的关键治疗药物,然而,吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)/长效β2受体激动剂(LABA)却被广泛应用。我们比较了长效毒蕈碱受体拮抗剂(LAMA)和ICS/LABA在COPD管理中升级至开放三联联合治疗的时间。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2005年1月至2015年4月从韩国国民健康保险服务中心选取的COPD患者。主要结局是初始接受LAMA或ICS/LABA治疗的患者升级至三联治疗的时间。其他结局包括升级至三联联合治疗的危险因素。

结果

共有2444例患者被分配至LAMA组或ICS/LABA组。LAMA组和ICS/LABA组三联联合治疗的发生率分别为每1000人年81.0例和139.8例(<0.001);升级至三联治疗的中位时间分别为281天和207天(P=0.03)。与LAMA相比,ICS/LABA治疗显示出更高的升级至三联治疗风险(风险比(HR),1.601;95%置信区间(CI),1.402-1.829)。相关危险因素为男性(HR,1.564;95%CI,1.352-1.809)。

结论

与ICS/LABA相比,以LAMA开始COPD治疗与升级至三联治疗的时间缩短相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de7c/8703927/03dbdf3eaa90/jpm-11-01325-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验