• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术后死亡率和住院时间的预测新方法。

A Novel Method to Predict Mortality and Length of Stay after Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 6;57(12):1332. doi: 10.3390/medicina57121332.

DOI:10.3390/medicina57121332
PMID:34946277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8707781/
Abstract

: We tested if a novel combination of predictors could improve the accuracy of outcome prediction after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). : This prospective study recruited 169 participants (49% female; median age 81 years). The primary endpoint was midterm mortality; secondary endpoints were acute Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 complication rate and post-TAVI in-hospital length of stay (LoS). EuroSCORE II (ESII), comorbidities (e.g., coronary artery disease), eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate; based on cystatin C), hemoglobin, creatinine, N-Terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP) levels and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs, namely EuroQol-5-Dimension-5-Levels, EQ5D5L; Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, KCCQ; clinical frailty scale, CFS) at baseline were tested as predictors. Regression (uni- and multi-variate Cox; linear; binary logistic) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-curve analysis were applied. : Within a median follow-up of 439 (318-585) days, 12 participants died (7.1%). Independent predictors of mortality using multivariate Cox regression were baseline eGFR ( = 0.001) and KCCQ ( = 0.037). Based on these predictors, a Linear Prediction Score (LPS1) was calculated. The LPS1-area under the curve (AUC)-value (0.761) was significantly higher than the ESII-AUC value (0.597; = 0.035). Independent predictors for LoS > 6 days (the median LoS) were eGFR ( = 0.028), NTproBNP ( = 0.034), and EQ5D5L values ( = 0.002); a respective calculated LPS2 provided an AUC value of 0.677 ( < 0.001). Eighty participants (47.3%) experienced complications. Male sex predicted complications only in the univariate analysis. : The combination of KCCQ and eGFR can better predict midterm mortality than ES II alone. Combining eGFR, NTproBNP, and EQ5D5L can reliably predict LoS after TAVI. This novel method improves personalized TAVI risk stratification and hence may help reduce post-TAVI risk.

摘要

我们测试了一种新的预测因子组合是否可以提高经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)后结局预测的准确性。这项前瞻性研究招募了 169 名参与者(49%为女性;中位年龄 81 岁)。主要终点是中期死亡率;次要终点是急性瓣膜学术研究联盟(VARC)-3 并发症发生率和 TAVI 后住院期间的住院时间(LoS)。欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统 II(ESII)、合并症(如冠状动脉疾病)、估算肾小球滤过率(基于胱抑素 C)、血红蛋白、肌酐、N-末端脑利钠肽前体(NTproBNP)水平和患者报告的结局测量(PROM,即欧洲五维健康量表-5 水平,EQ5D5L;堪萨斯城心肌病问卷,KCCQ;临床虚弱量表,CFS)在基线时作为预测因子进行了测试。应用回归(单变量和多变量 Cox;线性;二项逻辑)和接收器工作特征(ROC)曲线分析。在中位随访 439(318-585)天内,有 12 名参与者死亡(7.1%)。多变量 Cox 回归的独立死亡预测因子是基线 eGFR( = 0.001)和 KCCQ( = 0.037)。基于这些预测因子,计算了线性预测评分(LPS1)。LPS1 的曲线下面积(AUC)值(0.761)明显高于 ESII-AUC 值(0.597; = 0.035)。LoS>6 天(LoS 的中位数)的独立预测因子为 eGFR( = 0.028)、NTproBNP( = 0.034)和 EQ5D5L 值( = 0.002);计算出的 LPS2 提供了 AUC 值 0.677(<0.001)。80 名参与者(47.3%)发生并发症。男性仅在单变量分析中预测并发症。KCCQ 和 eGFR 的组合可以比 ES II 单独更好地预测中期死亡率。将 eGFR、NTproBNP 和 EQ5D5L 结合起来可以可靠地预测 TAVI 后的 LOS。这种新方法可以改善经导管主动脉瓣置换术的个体化风险分层,从而可能有助于降低经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的风险。

相似文献

1
A Novel Method to Predict Mortality and Length of Stay after Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术后死亡率和住院时间的预测新方法。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 6;57(12):1332. doi: 10.3390/medicina57121332.
2
Personalised preinterventional risk stratification of mortality, length of stay and hospitalisation costs in transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a machine learning algorithm: a pilot trial.使用机器学习算法对经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的死亡率、住院时间和住院费用进行个体化术前风险分层:一项试点研究。
Open Heart. 2024 Feb 22;11(1):e002540. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002540.
3
1-Year Clinical Outcomes in Women After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the First WIN-TAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后女性 1 年的临床结局:来自首个 WIN-TAVI 注册研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 8;11(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.034.
4
Evaluation of length of stay after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with SAPIEN 3 prosthesis: A French multicentre prospective observational trial.SAPIEN 3 假体经股动脉主动脉瓣置换术后住院时间评估:一项法国多中心前瞻性观察性试验。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Jun-Jul;113(6-7):391-400. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2019.11.010. Epub 2020 May 14.
5
The Role of Comorbidities in Predicting Functional Improvement After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.合并症在经导管主动脉瓣植入术后功能改善预测中的作用。
Heart Lung Circ. 2024 Jul;33(7):1018-1026. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2024.02.002. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
6
Acute and 30-Day Outcomes in Women After TAVR: Results From the WIN-TAVI (Women's INternational Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) Real-World Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后女性的急性和 30 天结局:来自 WIN-TAVI(女性国际经导管主动脉瓣植入)真实世界注册研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug 8;9(15):1589-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.05.015.
7
Post procedural risk assessment in patients undergoing trans aortic valve implantation according to the age, creatinine, and ejection fraction-7 score: Advantages of age, creatinine, and ejection fraction-7 in stratification of post-procedural outcome.经主动脉瓣植入术后患者的年龄、肌酐和射血分数-7 评分的术后风险评估:年龄、肌酐和射血分数-7 在术后结局分层中的优势。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan 1;93(1):141-148. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27806. Epub 2018 Sep 30.
8
Predictability and Outcome of Vascular Complications after Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经股动脉导管主动脉瓣植入术后血管并发症的可预测性及结局
J Heart Valve Dis. 2016 Mar;25(2):173-181.
9
The impact of chronic kidney disease in women undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Analysis from the Women's INternational Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (WIN-TAVI) registry.女性经导管主动脉瓣置换术后慢性肾脏病的影响:来自女性国际经导管主动脉瓣植入术(WIN-TAVI)注册研究的分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;96(1):198-207. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28752. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
10
Five-year follow-up after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for symptomatic aortic stenosis.症状性主动脉瓣狭窄经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的五年随访
Heart. 2017 Dec;103(24):1970-1976. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-311004. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Personalised preinterventional risk stratification of mortality, length of stay and hospitalisation costs in transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a machine learning algorithm: a pilot trial.使用机器学习算法对经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的死亡率、住院时间和住院费用进行个体化术前风险分层:一项试点研究。
Open Heart. 2024 Feb 22;11(1):e002540. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002540.
2
Personalized Preoperative Prediction of the Length of Hospital Stay after TAVI Using a Dedicated Decision Tree Algorithm.使用专用决策树算法对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后住院时间进行个性化术前预测。
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 24;12(3):346. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030346.

本文引用的文献

1
Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research.瓣膜学术研究联合会 3 期:主动脉瓣临床研究更新的终点定义。
Eur Heart J. 2021 May 14;42(19):1825-1857. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa799.
2
Comparison of New York Heart Association Class and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.纽约心脏协会心功能分级与射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者报告结局的比较。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 May 1;6(5):522-531. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0372.
3
Practical Application of Patient-Reported Health Status Measures for Transcatheter Valve Therapies: Insights From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapies Registry.
患者报告的健康状况测量指标在经导管瓣膜治疗中的实际应用:来自胸外科医师协会/美国心脏病学会经导管瓣膜治疗注册研究的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Mar;14(3):e007187. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007187. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
4
Potential Role and Prognostic Value of Erythropoietin Levels in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.红细胞生成素水平在接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的潜在作用及预后价值
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Nov 30;7:605257. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.605257. eCollection 2020.
5
Comparison of Procedural and 1-Year Clinical Results of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using Prostheses with Different Design of Support Frame.使用不同支撑框架设计的假体进行经导管主动脉瓣植入术的手术及1年临床结果比较。
Int Heart J. 2020 Nov 28;61(6):1196-1203. doi: 10.1536/ihj.20-398. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
6
Prognostic Implications of Renal Dysfunction in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄患者肾功能障碍的预后意义。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;125(7):1108-1114. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.12.040. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
7
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk.对于手术风险较低的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者,经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 20;12(12):CD013319. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013319.pub2.
8
Trial protocol for the validation of the 'Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life (TASQ) Questionnaire' in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): the TASQ registry.“多伦多主动脉瓣狭窄生活质量(TASQ)问卷”在接受外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)或经股动脉(TF)经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者中的验证试验方案:TASQ注册研究
Open Heart. 2019 May 21;6(1):e001008. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001008. eCollection 2019.
9
Meta-Analysis of Impact of Baseline N-TerminalPro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels on SurvivalAfter Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄患者基线 N 末端脑利钠肽前体水平对生存影响的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Mar 1;123(5):820-826. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.11.030. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
10
Length of Stay and Discharge Disposition After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States.美国经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术后的住院时间和出院去向。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e006929. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006929.