Psychology Department, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Istanbul Bilgi University, Santralistanbul Eski Silahtarağa Elektrik Santralı Kazım Karabekir Cad. No: 2/13, Istanbul 34060, Turkey.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 9;18(24):13007. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413007.
Despite advances in psychotherapy research showing an evidence-base for psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT) in adolescents, developmentally specific treatment characteristics are under-researched. We aimed to identify interaction structures (IS: reciprocal patterns of in-session interactions involving therapist interventions, patient behaviors, and the therapeutic relationship) and assess associations between IS and outcome. The study cohort comprised 43 adolescents ( = 13.02 years) with nonclinical, internalizing, and comorbid internalizing-externalizing problems in PDT. A total of 123 sessions from different treatment phases were rated based on the Adolescent Psychotherapy Q-Set (APQ). Outcome was assessed with the Brief Problem Monitor-Youth (BPM-Y) administered repeatedly over the treatment course. Principal component analysis of APQ items resulted in five IS, named "Negative Therapeutic Alliance", "Demanding Patient, Accommodating Therapist", "Emotionally Distant Resistant Patient", "Inexpressive Patient, Inviting Therapist", and "Exploratory Psychodynamic Technique" (EPT). Multilevel modeling analyses with Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) estimations indicated a two-way interaction effect between EPT and problem levels at baseline such that patients with lower problems at baseline showed good outcome in the context of EPT, whereas an inverse relationship was found for patients with higher problems. Findings provide empirical evidence for characteristic components of PDT for adolescents and preliminary answers about who benefits from psychodynamic techniques.
尽管心理治疗研究的进展表明心理动力学心理治疗(PDT)在青少年中有其证据基础,但针对特定于发展阶段的治疗特征的研究还很不足。我们旨在确定交互结构(IS:涉及治疗师干预、患者行为和治疗关系的会话内交互的互惠模式),并评估 IS 与结果之间的关联。研究队列包括 43 名非临床、内化和共病内化-外化问题的青少年(n=13.02 岁),他们接受 PDT 治疗。根据青少年心理治疗 Q 集(APQ)对不同治疗阶段的 123 个疗程进行评分。使用青少年简明问题监测表(BPM-Y)在治疗过程中多次重复评估结果。APQ 项目的主成分分析产生了五个 IS,分别命名为“消极治疗联盟”、“要求苛刻的患者,顺应的治疗师”、“情绪疏远的抗拒患者”、“表达不畅的患者,邀请治疗师”和“探索性心理动力学技术”(EPT)。使用贝叶斯马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)估计的多层次模型分析表明,EPT 和基线问题水平之间存在双向交互作用,即基线问题较低的患者在 EPT 背景下表现出良好的结果,而基线问题较高的患者则表现出相反的关系。研究结果为青少年 PDT 的特征性成分提供了经验证据,并初步回答了谁从心理动力学技术中受益的问题。