Suppr超能文献

治疗联盟、治疗师专业知识、治疗师技术干预、患者元认知和功能之间的治疗过程中的会话互动动态。

In-session interactive dynamics of the psychotherapy process between therapeutic alliance, therapist expertise, therapist technical intervention, patient metacognition and functioning.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Psychother. 2020 Nov;27(6):902-914. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2478. Epub 2020 Jun 4.

Abstract

Empirical research has explored different dimensions of the therapy process and their associations, often showing bidirectional links: for example, metacognition may be favoured by a positive alliance with the clinician; on the other hand, metacognitive difficulties may be an obstacle for the alliance. However, little is still known about the overall relationship between multiple dimensions during the psychotherapy process. The aim of this study is to further explore the in-session interaction of therapeutic process variables, focusing on patient metacognition, therapeutic alliance, technical intervention, therapist expertise, and patient functioning. Participants included 45 patients involved in a psychodynamic weekly treatment in two clinical centres. Therapists were both in-training and experienced clinicians. Four instruments were applied on four psychotherapy sessions (178 verbatim transcripts): Metacognition Assessment Scale-Revised (MAS-R) assessing metacognition, Collaborative Interaction Scale (CIS) assessing therapeutic alliance, Psychodynamic Intervention Rating Scale (PIRS) assessing therapist technical interventions, and Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP)-200 assessing patient functioning. Sequential analyses revealed that specific therapist interventions co-occurred with three different levels of therapeutic alliance: a first one characterized by positive collaboration, the second one by neutral collaboration, and the third one by ruptures. Moreover, and critically, the patient metacognition, patient functioning, and therapist expertise were found to exert different effects in the three alliance levels. These findings suggest the existence of a specific interdependence between the variables involved in the research. These results further indicate that the therapist expertise is a key element in the therapeutic process, as it can drastically affect the in-session interactive dynamic.

摘要

实证研究探索了治疗过程的不同维度及其关联,通常显示出双向联系:例如,元认知可能与临床医生的积极联盟有关;另一方面,元认知困难可能是联盟的障碍。然而,对于心理治疗过程中多个维度的整体关系,我们知之甚少。本研究旨在进一步探讨治疗过程变量的会话内相互作用,重点关注患者的元认知、治疗联盟、技术干预、治疗师专业知识和患者功能。参与者包括来自两个临床中心的 45 名接受每周一次心理动力学治疗的患者。治疗师既有培训中的,也有经验丰富的临床医生。四项工具应用于四项心理治疗会话(178 个逐字记录):元认知评估量表修订版(MAS-R)评估元认知、协作互动量表(CIS)评估治疗联盟、心理动力学干预评定量表(PIRS)评估治疗师的技术干预,以及谢德勒-韦斯顿评估程序(SWAP)-200 评估患者功能。顺序分析显示,特定的治疗师干预与三种不同水平的治疗联盟同时出现:第一个特征是积极的协作,第二个特征是中性的协作,第三个特征是破裂。此外,至关重要的是,患者的元认知、患者的功能和治疗师的专业知识在这三种联盟水平中都有不同的影响。这些发现表明研究中涉及的变量之间存在特定的相互依存关系。这些结果进一步表明,治疗师的专业知识是治疗过程中的一个关键因素,因为它可以极大地影响会话内的互动动态。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验