Division of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80100 Napoli, Italy.
Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, Università di Napoli "Federico II", 80100 Napoli, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 19;18(24):13372. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413372.
Due to a lack of published evidence on the topic, a modified Delphi approach was used to develop recommendations useful for chronic pain management during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Focusing on the available literature and personal clinical expertise, an Italian board of nine professionals from different disciplines identified four main topics: prevention of chronic pain, treatment of chronic pain, consequences of inadequate treatment, and perspectives. They elaborated a semi-structured questionnaire. A multidisciplinary panel of experts in the field of pain management was requested to comment on the statements. Based on the answers provided, a structured questionnaire was prepared (Round 1). It included 21 statements divided into three categories (organizational issues; diagnosis and therapies; telemedicine and future perspectives). A five-point Likert scale was adopted. The threshold for consensus was set at a minimum of 70% of the number of respondents (level of agreement ≥ 4, Agree or Strongly Agree). A final questionnaire with rephrasing of the statements that did not reach the consensus threshold was elaborated (Round 2). A total of 29 clinicians were included in the panel. Twenty clinicians (69%) responded in both the first and second round. After two rounds, consensus (≥70%) was achieved in 20 out of 21 statements. The lack of consensus was recorded for the statement regarding the management of post-COVID pain (55%; Median 4; IQR 2.3). Another statement on telemedicine reached the threshold in the first round (70%), but the value was not confirmed in Round 2 (65%; Median 4; IQR 2). Most of the proposed items reached consensus, suggesting the need to make organizational changes, the structuring of careful diagnostic and therapeutic pathways, and the application of new technologies in pain medicine. Long-COVID-19 care is an issue that needs further research. Remote assistance for chronic pain must be regulated.
由于缺乏关于该主题的已发表证据,因此采用改良的 Delphi 方法制定了有助于在 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后进行慢性疼痛管理的建议。意大利的一个由来自不同学科的九位专业人员组成的委员会,根据现有文献和个人临床专业知识,确定了四个主要主题:预防慢性疼痛、治疗慢性疼痛、治疗不足的后果以及前景。他们制定了一份半结构化的调查问卷。要求疼痛管理领域的多学科专家小组对陈述发表意见。根据提供的答案,制定了一份结构化的问卷(第 1 轮)。它包括 21 个陈述,分为三个类别(组织问题;诊断和治疗;远程医疗和未来展望)。采用 5 分李克特量表。达成共识的门槛设定为至少 70%的受访者人数(同意程度≥4,同意或强烈同意)。对于未达到共识阈值的陈述,制定了最终的问卷(第 2 轮),并重新措辞。该小组共有 29 名临床医生参加。在第一轮和第二轮中,有 20 名临床医生(69%)做出了回应。两轮后,21 个陈述中有 20 个达成了共识(≥70%)。关于管理 COVID-19 后疼痛的陈述存在分歧(55%;中位数 4;IQR 2.3)。另一个关于远程医疗的陈述在第一轮达到了阈值(70%),但在第二轮未得到确认(65%;中位数 4;IQR 2)。提出的大多数项目都达成了共识,这表明需要进行组织变革,制定仔细的诊断和治疗途径,并在疼痛医学中应用新技术。长期 COVID-19 护理是一个需要进一步研究的问题。远程协助慢性疼痛必须得到规范。