• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Consensus recommendations for opioid agonist treatment following the introduction of emergency clinical guidelines in Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national Delphi study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间爱尔兰引入紧急临床指南后,阿片类激动剂治疗的共识建议:一项全国性 Delphi 研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Aug;106:103768. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103768. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
2
Impact of changes to the delivery of opioid agonist treatment, introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic, on treatment access and dropout in Ireland: An interrupted time series analysis.爱尔兰阿片类激动剂治疗方案在 COVID-19 大流行期间发生变化,对治疗的可及性和脱落率的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023 Jun;149:209029. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209029. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
3
A national model of remote care for assessing and providing opioid agonist treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic: a report.全国远程医疗模式评估及在 COVID-19 大流行期间提供阿片类激动剂治疗:报告。
Harm Reduct J. 2020 Jul 17;17(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00394-z.
4
Optimising treatment in opioid dependency in primary care: results from a national key stakeholder and expert focus group in Ireland.优化初级保健中阿片类药物依赖的治疗:爱尔兰全国主要利益相关者和专家焦点小组的结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jun 30;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0792-8.
5
Evaluating how has care been affected by the Ontario COVID-19 Opioid Agonist Treatment Guidance: Patients' and prescribers' experiences with changes in unsupervised dosing.评估安大略省 COVID-19 阿片类激动剂治疗指南如何影响护理:患者和处方者对非监督剂量变化的体验。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Apr;102:103573. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103573. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
6
Evaluating interventions to facilitate opioid agonist treatment access among people who inject drugs in Toronto, Ontario during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.评估在 COVID-19 大流行限制期间,在安大略省多伦多为注射吸毒者提供阿片类激动剂治疗的干预措施。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Jun;104:103680. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103680. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
7
EAN consensus statement for management of patients with neurological diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic.EAN 共识声明:COVID-19 大流行期间神经系统疾病患者的管理。
Eur J Neurol. 2021 Jan;28(1):7-14. doi: 10.1111/ene.14521. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
8
Medication appropriateness tool for co-morbid health conditions in dementia: consensus recommendations from a multidisciplinary expert panel.痴呆症共病健康状况的药物适宜性工具:多学科专家小组的共识建议
Intern Med J. 2016 Oct;46(10):1189-1197. doi: 10.1111/imj.13215.
9
REPAIRS Delphi: A UK and Ireland Consensus Statement on the Management of Infected Arterial Pseudoaneurysms Secondary to Groin Injecting Drug Use.REPAIRS Delphi:英国和爱尔兰关于腹股沟注射吸毒导致感染性动脉假性动脉瘤处理的共识声明。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Oct;68(4):530-540. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.04.016. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
10
Deimplementation in the provision of opioid agonist treatment to achieve equity of care for people engaged in treatment: a qualitative study.在提供阿片类激动剂治疗以实现接受治疗者获得公平照护方面的去实施化:一项定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2023 Jun 9;18(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01281-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of guidance issued during COVID-19 to expand take-home doses of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) in Ireland: protocol for a population-based analysis of prescribing practices and patient outcomes 2018 to 2023.新冠疫情期间发布的指南对爱尔兰扩大阿片类激动剂治疗(OAT)带回家剂量的影响:2018年至2023年基于人群的处方实践和患者结局分析方案
HRB Open Res. 2025 Apr 7;8:32. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.14044.2. eCollection 2025.
2
Developing a Theoretically Informed Implementation Model for Telemedicine-Delivered Medication for Opioid Use Disorder: Qualitative Study With Key Informants.为阿片类物质使用障碍的远程医疗给药开发一个理论完善的实施模型:对关键信息提供者的定性研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Oct 18;10:e47186. doi: 10.2196/47186.
3
Prescription drugs with potential for misuse in Irish prisons: analysis of national prison prescribing trends, by gender and history of opioid use disorder, 2012 to 2020.爱尔兰监狱中具有潜在滥用风险的处方药物:按性别和阿片类药物使用障碍史分析 2012 年至 2020 年全国监狱配药趋势。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 6;23(1):725. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05195-9.
4
Understanding the use of telemedicine across different opioid use disorder treatment models: A scoping review.了解远程医疗在不同阿片类药物使用障碍治疗模式中的应用:一项范围综述。
J Telemed Telecare. 2025 May;31(4):500-514. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231195607. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
5
Comparative effectiveness of urine drug screening strategies alongside opioid agonist treatment in British Columbia, Canada: a population-based observational study protocol.加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省阿片类激动剂治疗中尿药物筛选策略的比较效果:一项基于人群的观察性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 31;13(5):e068729. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068729.
6
Prescription drugs with potential for misuse: protocol for a multi-indicator analysis of supply, detection and the associated health burden in Ireland between 2010 and 2020.潜在滥用风险的处方药物:2010 年至 2020 年期间爱尔兰供应、检测和相关健康负担的多指标分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 2;13(3):e069665. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069665.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of take-home doses of opioid agonist therapy in Ontario, Canada: A population-based time-series analysis.加拿大安大略省 COVID-19 大流行对提供阿片类激动剂治疗带药回家方案的影响:基于人群的时间序列分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 May;103:103644. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103644. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
2
Association Between Increased Dispensing of Opioid Agonist Therapy Take-Home Doses and Opioid Overdose and Treatment Interruption and Discontinuation.阿片类激动剂治疗带药回家剂量增加与阿片类药物过量和治疗中断及停药的关系。
JAMA. 2022 Mar 1;327(9):846-855. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1271.
3
Evaluating how has care been affected by the Ontario COVID-19 Opioid Agonist Treatment Guidance: Patients' and prescribers' experiences with changes in unsupervised dosing.评估安大略省 COVID-19 阿片类激动剂治疗指南如何影响护理:患者和处方者对非监督剂量变化的体验。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Apr;102:103573. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103573. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
4
The COVID-19 pandemic and the health of people who use illicit opioids in New York City, the first 12 months.纽约市首 12 个月的 COVID-19 大流行与滥用非法阿片类药物者的健康
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Mar;101:103554. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103554. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
5
The impact of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on drug overdose-related deaths in the United States and Canada: a systematic review of observational studies and analysis of public health surveillance data.新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对美国和加拿大药物过量相关死亡的影响:观察性研究的系统评价及公共卫生监测数据分析
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Nov 29;16(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13011-021-00423-5.
6
Effectiveness of public health measures in reducing the incidence of covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and covid-19 mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.公共卫生措施在降低新冠病毒发病率、SARS-CoV-2 传播率和新冠死亡率方面的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2021 Nov 17;375:e068302. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068302.
7
Early innovations in opioid use disorder treatment and harm reduction during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.COVID-19 大流行期间阿片类药物使用障碍治疗和减少伤害的早期创新:范围综述。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2021 Nov 13;16(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13722-021-00275-1.
8
Trends in drug poisoning deaths, by sex, in Ireland: a repeated cross-sectional study from 2004 to 2017.爱尔兰性别间药物中毒死亡趋势:2004 年至 2017 年的重复横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 3;11(9):e048000. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048000.
9
Patients' perceptions of telehealth services for outpatient treatment of substance use disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic.患者对 COVID-19 大流行期间用于治疗物质使用障碍的门诊患者远程医疗服务的看法。
Am J Addict. 2021 Sep;30(5):445-452. doi: 10.1111/ajad.13207. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
10
"It's like 'liquid handcuffs": The effects of take-home dosing policies on Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) patients' lives.“就像‘液体手铐’:美沙酮维持治疗(MMT)患者生活中的带药政策影响。”
Harm Reduct J. 2021 Aug 14;18(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00535-y.

在 COVID-19 大流行期间爱尔兰引入紧急临床指南后,阿片类激动剂治疗的共识建议:一项全国性 Delphi 研究。

Consensus recommendations for opioid agonist treatment following the introduction of emergency clinical guidelines in Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national Delphi study.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Science, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, First Floor, Ardilaun House (Block B), 111 St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, D02 VN51, Ireland.

Health Service Executive, National Social Inclusion Office, Mill Lane, Palmerstown, Dublin 20, D20 KH63, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Aug;106:103768. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103768. Epub 2022 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103768
PMID:35738029
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9212711/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency contingency guidelines for opioid agonist treatment (OAT) were introduced in Ireland in March 2020, to ensure rapid and uninterrupted access to treatment while mitigating COVID-19 risk. The contingency guidelines deviated, across multiple clinical domains, from pre-pandemic clinical guidelines published in 2016. The objectives of this study are to (1) identify changes introduced to OAT clinical guidelines in Ireland during the pandemic; and (2) develop consensus on whether the new recommendations should be retained beyond the pandemic, using a national Delphi consensus methodology.

METHODS

Clinical guidance recommendations ('statements') were generated by comparing the newly established contingency guidelines with the national 2016 Clinical Guidelines for OAT. Over two rounds of on-line Delphi testing, a panel of experts (people currently accessing OAT, psychiatrists, general practitioners, community pharmacists, a nurse, a psychologist and support/key workers) independently rated their agreement with each statement and provided comments. Statements with a median score of 4 or 5 and a lower quartile of ≥4 were classified as having reached consensus.

RESULTS

Forty-eight panel members were recruited, with a high participation level at Round 2 (90%, n=43). Consensus was achieved for 12 of the 19 statements at Round 1. The 7 remaining statements were revised, with 2 new statements, resulting in 9 statements at Round 2. Four statements reached consensus at Round 2. The final list includes 16 clinical guidance statements; 9 relating to assessment, 3 to OAT drug choice and dosing, 1 to take-away doses, 2 to overdose prevention and 1 to the continuation of e-prescriptions.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide range of stakeholders involved in the delivery and receipt of OAT agreed on 16 clinical guidance statements for inclusion in OAT clinical guidelines as we move beyond the pandemic, rather than reverting to pre-pandemic guidelines. The agreed statements relate to facilitating safe access to OAT with minimal waiting time, supporting patient-centred care to promote health and well-being, and preventing drug overdose. Notably, consensus was not achieved for OAT drug dosage and frequency of urine testing during the stabilisation and maintenance phase of care.

摘要

背景

2020 年 3 月,爱尔兰推出了阿片类药物激动剂治疗(OAT)紧急应急指南,以确保在减轻 COVID-19 风险的同时,快速、不间断地获得治疗。应急指南在多个临床领域偏离了 2016 年发布的流行前临床指南。本研究的目的是:(1) 确定在大流行期间爱尔兰 OAT 临床指南中引入的变化;(2) 使用国家德尔菲共识方法,就新建议是否应在大流行后保留达成共识。

方法

通过将新制定的应急指南与国家 2016 年 OAT 临床指南进行比较,生成临床指导建议(“陈述”)。在两轮在线德尔菲测试中,一组专家(目前接受 OAT 治疗的人、精神科医生、全科医生、社区药剂师、护士、心理学家和支持/关键工作人员)独立对每条陈述的同意程度进行评分,并提供意见。中位数评分为 4 或 5,四分位距下限为≥4 的陈述被归类为达成共识。

结果

共招募了 48 名小组成员,第二轮的参与度很高(90%,n=43)。第一轮有 12 项陈述达成共识。对其余 7 项陈述进行了修订,新增 2 项陈述,第二轮共 9 项陈述。第二轮有 4 项陈述达成共识。最终列表包括 16 项临床指导陈述;9 项与评估有关,3 项与 OAT 药物选择和剂量有关,1 项与外出剂量有关,2 项与预防过量有关,1 项与电子处方的延续有关。

结论

参与 OAT 提供和接收的广泛利益相关者就 16 项临床指导陈述达成一致,这些陈述将被纳入 OAT 临床指南,以便我们在大流行结束后继续使用,而不是恢复到大流行前的指南。达成一致的陈述涉及促进安全获得 OAT,尽量减少等待时间,支持以患者为中心的护理,以促进健康和福祉,预防药物过量。值得注意的是,在治疗的稳定和维持阶段,对于 OAT 药物剂量和尿液检测频率,未达成共识。