• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高成本肿瘤药物可持续性挑战:意大利癌症中心的预算模型。

The Challenge of Sustainability of High-Cost Oncological Drugs: A Budgeting Model in an Italian Cancer Center.

机构信息

Oncological Pharmacy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori" IRST s.r.l., via Piero Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy.

Budget and Planning Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori" IRST s.r.l., via Piero Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 20;18(24):13413. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413413.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182413413
PMID:34949032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8707715/
Abstract

In Italy, drug expenditure governance is achieved by setting caps based on the percentage increase in hospital spending compared to the previous year. This method is ineffective in identifying issues and opportunities as it does not consider an analysis of the number of treated cases and per capita consumption in local and regional settings. The IRCCS (Scientific hospitalization and treatment institute) Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori" in Meldola, has developed and adopted an effective management model designed to oversee pharmaceutical expenditure, guarantee prescription appropriateness and quality of care to patients. The budget setting follows a structured process which evaluates determining factors of the expenditure such as expected patients calculated according to the epidemiology and to national and regional indications of appropriateness, mean cost per patient calculated on the average period of demonstrated efficacy of the drug and use of drugs with the best cost-effectiveness ratio. Strict monitoring and integrated purchasing processes allow for immediate corrective actions on expenditures, as well as a continuous dialogue with the region in order to guarantee consistent funding of IRST activities. The model, presented in this article is efficient and implements concepts beyond the conventional "silos" approach and national and regional governance tools, in terms of patient centricity.

摘要

在意大利,通过设定基于与前一年相比医院支出增长百分比的上限来实现药物支出管理。这种方法在识别问题和机会方面效果不佳,因为它没有考虑到对当地和地区环境中治疗病例数量和人均消费的分析。位于 Meldola 的意大利肿瘤研究所(IRCCS)“Dino Amadori”研究所开发并采用了一种有效的管理模式,旨在监督药物支出,保证处方的适当性和对患者的护理质量。预算设定遵循一个结构化的过程,该过程评估支出的决定因素,如根据流行病学和国家及地区的适当性计算预期患者、根据药物已证明的疗效平均周期计算每位患者的平均成本以及使用具有最佳成本效益比的药物。严格的监测和综合采购流程允许对支出进行即时的纠正措施,并与地区保持持续的对话,以保证对研究所活动的持续资助。本文介绍的模型是高效的,并在以患者为中心的理念方面超越了传统的“筒仓”方法和国家及地区治理工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7894/8707715/91572975aac8/ijerph-18-13413-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7894/8707715/0ed5315cd4f0/ijerph-18-13413-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7894/8707715/fbc7ff78ee79/ijerph-18-13413-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7894/8707715/d46dffaa5c15/ijerph-18-13413-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7894/8707715/91572975aac8/ijerph-18-13413-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7894/8707715/0ed5315cd4f0/ijerph-18-13413-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7894/8707715/fbc7ff78ee79/ijerph-18-13413-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7894/8707715/d46dffaa5c15/ijerph-18-13413-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7894/8707715/91572975aac8/ijerph-18-13413-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Challenge of Sustainability of High-Cost Oncological Drugs: A Budgeting Model in an Italian Cancer Center.高成本肿瘤药物可持续性挑战:意大利癌症中心的预算模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 20;18(24):13413. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413413.
2
The role of clinical trials in the sustainability of the Italian national health service cancer drug expenditure.临床试验在意大利国家卫生服务癌症药物支出可持续性中的作用。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2023 Mar;30(2):96-100. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003297. Epub 2022 May 16.
3
Erratum: Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection.勘误:通过粪便DNA完整性检测评估结直肠癌风险和患病率。
J Vis Exp. 2020 Sep 28(163). doi: 10.3791/6446.
4
Commentary on: "Randomized, controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial assessing treatment preference for pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: PISCES study." Escudier B, Porta C, Bono P, Powles T, Eisen T, Sternberg CN, Gschwend JE, De Giorgi U, Parikh O, Hawkins R, Sevin E, Négrier S, Khan S, Diaz J, Redhu S, Mehmud F, Cella D. Bernard Escudier, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Emmanuel Sevin, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; Sylvie Négrier, Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Camillo Porta, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia; Cora N Sternberg, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome; Ugo De Giorgi, IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Meldola, Italy; Petri Bono, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Thomas Powles, Barts Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London; Tim Eisen, Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge; Omi Parikh, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire; Robert Hawkins, Christie Cancer Research UK, Manchester; Sadya Khan, Jose Diaz, and Faisal Mehmud, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, United Kingdom; Jürgen E Gschwend, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany; Suman Redhu, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA; David Cella, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.: J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 10;32(14):1412-1418; doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.8267. [Epub 2014 Mar 31].对《转移性肾细胞癌患者中评估帕唑帕尼与舒尼替尼治疗偏好的随机、对照、双盲、交叉试验:双鱼座研究》的评论。埃斯库迪尔B、波尔塔C、博诺P、鲍尔斯T、艾森T、斯特恩伯格CN、施温德JE、德乔吉U、帕里克O、霍金斯R、塞万E、内格里耶S、汗S、迪亚兹J、雷杜S、马哈茂德F、切拉D。贝尔纳·埃斯库迪尔,古斯塔夫·鲁西研究所,维勒瑞夫;埃马纽埃尔·塞万,弗朗索瓦·巴克莱斯中心,卡昂;西尔维·内格里耶,里昂贝拉尔癌症中心,法国里昂;卡米洛·波尔塔,圣马泰奥综合医院科学研究所(IRCCS),帕维亚;科拉·N·斯特恩伯格,圣卡米洛·福尔拉尼尼医院,罗马;乌戈·德乔吉,罗曼诺肿瘤研究与治疗科学研究所(IRCCS),梅尔多拉,意大利;佩特里·博诺,赫尔辛基大学中心医院,芬兰赫尔辛基;托马斯·鲍尔斯,巴茨实验癌症医学中心,巴茨癌症研究所,伦敦玛丽女王大学,伦敦;蒂姆·艾森,剑桥大学健康合作伙伴,剑桥;奥米·帕里克,兰开夏郡皇家普雷斯顿医院;罗伯特·霍金斯,英国曼彻斯特克里斯蒂癌症研究中心;萨迪亚·汗、何塞·迪亚兹和费萨尔·马哈茂德,葛兰素史克公司,英国乌克斯布里奇;于尔根·E·施温德,慕尼黑工业大学伊萨尔河右岸医院,德国慕尼黑;苏曼·雷杜,葛兰素史克公司,宾夕法尼亚州科尔盖特维尔;大卫·切拉,西北大学费恩伯格医学院,伊利诺伊州芝加哥。《临床肿瘤学杂志》。2014年5月10日;32(14):1412 - 1418;doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.8267。[2014年3月31日在线发表]
Urol Oncol. 2016 May;34(5):251. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
5
Challenges to achieving value in drug spending in a decentralized country: the Spanish case.在一个分权国家实现药品支出价值面临的挑战:以西班牙为例。
Value Health. 2003 Jul-Aug;6 Suppl 1:S52-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.6.s1.6.x.
6
Cost utility and budget impact of third-generation aromatase inhibitors for advanced breast cancer: a literature-based model analysis of costs in the Italian National Health Service.第三代芳香化酶抑制剂用于晚期乳腺癌的成本效用和预算影响:基于意大利国家医疗服务体系成本的文献模型分析
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1546-61. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.014.
7
Using disease management and market reforms to address the adverse economic effects of drug budgets and price and reimbursement regulations in Germany.利用疾病管理和市场改革应对德国药品预算、价格及报销规定带来的不利经济影响。
Value Health. 2003 Jul-Aug;6 Suppl 1:S20-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.6.s1.3.x.
8
Correction: MYC-containing amplicons in acute myeloid leukemia: genomic structures, evolution, and transcriptional consequences.更正:急性髓系白血病中含MYC的扩增子:基因组结构、进化及转录后果
Leukemia. 2018 Oct;32(10):2304. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0177-y.
9
The Comprehensive Cancer Care Network of Romagna: the opportunities generated by the OECI accreditation program.罗马涅综合癌症护理网络:欧洲癌症研究所(OECI)认证计划带来的机遇
Tumori. 2015;101 Suppl 1:S55-9. doi: 10.5301/tj.5000462. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
10
Appropriateness and Economic Analysis of Conventional Circulating Biomarkers Assessment in Early Breast Cancer: A Real-World Experience from the E.Pic.A Study.常规循环生物标志物评估在早期乳腺癌中的适宜性和经济学分析:E.Pic.A 研究的真实世界经验。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Jan 18;29(2):433-438. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29020039.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing early access policies for innovative cancer drugs: a scoping review and explorative analysis in the Italian setting.推进创新癌症药物的早期获取政策:意大利背景下的范围审查与探索性分析
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Jul 15;17(1):2377697. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2377697. eCollection 2024.
2
Pricing and reimbursement mechanisms for advanced therapy medicinal products in 20 countries.20个国家的先进治疗药品定价与报销机制
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Nov 28;14:1199500. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1199500. eCollection 2023.
3
pH-Responsive Polymer Nanomaterials for Tumor Therapy.

本文引用的文献

1
Forecasting drug utilization and expenditure: ten years of experience in Stockholm.预测药物利用和支出:斯德哥尔摩十年的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 11;20(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05170-0.
2
The challenge of sustainability in healthcare systems: Frequency and cost of inappropriate patterns of breast cancer care (the E.Pic.A study).医疗保健系统中的可持续性挑战:乳腺癌不适当治疗模式的频率和成本(E.Pic.A研究)
Breast. 2017 Aug;34:103-107. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 27.
3
The cost and burden of cancer in the European Union 1995-2014.
用于肿瘤治疗的pH响应性聚合物纳米材料
Front Oncol. 2022 Mar 22;12:855019. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.855019. eCollection 2022.
1995 - 2014年欧盟癌症的成本与负担
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Oct;66:162-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.06.022. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
4
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.GRADE 指南:1. 简介-GRADE 证据概况和发现摘要表。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
5
Going from evidence to recommendations.从证据到建议。
BMJ. 2008 May 10;336(7652):1049-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39493.646875.AE.
6
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.证据质量分级与推荐强度
BMJ. 2004 Jun 19;328(7454):1490. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490.
7
Using disease management and market reforms to address the adverse economic effects of drug budgets and price and reimbursement regulations in Germany.利用疾病管理和市场改革应对德国药品预算、价格及报销规定带来的不利经济影响。
Value Health. 2003 Jul-Aug;6 Suppl 1:S20-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.6.s1.3.x.
8
The drug budget silo mentality: the French case.药品预算的孤立思维:以法国为例。
Value Health. 2003 Jul-Aug;6 Suppl 1:S10-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.6.s1.2.x.
9
The drug budget silo mentality in Europe: an overview.欧洲药品预算的孤立心态:概述
Value Health. 2003 Jul-Aug;6 Suppl 1:S1-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.6.s1.1.x.