Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia (J.T.N., M.R., A.B., G.P., L.T.P.T., M.R.N., R.L.W., C.M.R., A.M.T., J.M., P.L.).
Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Centre, Hamburg, Germany (J.T.N.).
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2022 Feb;15(1):e003429. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.121.003429. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
The use of a polygenic risk score (PRS) to improve risk prediction of coronary heart disease (CHD) events has been demonstrated to have clinical utility in the general adult population. However, the prognostic value of a PRS for CHD has not been examined specifically in older populations of individuals aged ≥70 years, who comprise a distinct high-risk subgroup. The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of a PRS for incident CHD events in a prospective cohort of older individuals without a history of cardiovascular events.
We used data from 12 792 genotyped, healthy older individuals enrolled into the ASPREE trial (Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly), a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating the effect of daily 100 mg aspirin on disability-free survival. Participants had no previous history of diagnosed atherothrombotic cardiovascular events, dementia, or persistent physical disability at enrollment. We calculated a PRS (meta-genomic risk score) consisting of 1.7 million genetic variants. The primary outcome was a composite of incident myocardial infarction or CHD death over 5 years.
At baseline, the median population age was 73.9 years, and 54.9% were female. In total, 254 incident CHD events occurred. When the PRS was added to conventional risk factors, it was independently associated with CHD (hazard ratio, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.08-1.42], =0.002). The area under the curve of the conventional model was 70.53 (95% CI, 67.00-74.06), and after inclusion of the PRS increased to 71.78 (95% CI, 68.32-75.24, =0.019), demonstrating improved prediction. Reclassification was also improved, as the continuous net reclassification index after adding PRS to the conventional model was 0.25 (95% CI, 0.15-0.28).
A PRS for CHD performs well in older people and improves prediction over conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Our study provides evidence that genomic risk prediction for CHD has clinical utility in individuals aged 70 years and older. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01038583.
多基因风险评分(PRS)已被证明可用于改善冠心病(CHD)事件的风险预测,在普通成年人群中具有临床实用性。然而,PRS 对 CHD 的预后价值尚未在年龄≥70 岁的老年人群中进行专门评估,这些人群是一个独特的高风险亚组。本研究旨在评估 PRS 在无心血管事件史的老年人群中预测 CHD 事件的预测价值。
我们使用了 12792 名接受基因检测的健康老年人的 ASPREE 试验(阿司匹林减少老年人事件)数据,这是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验,旨在研究每天服用 100 毫克阿司匹林对无残疾生存的影响。参与者在入组时无诊断为动脉粥样硬化血栓形成性心血管事件、痴呆或持续性身体残疾的既往病史。我们计算了一个由 170 万个遗传变异组成的 PRS(元基因组风险评分)。主要结局是 5 年内发生心肌梗死或 CHD 死亡的复合事件。
基线时,人群年龄中位数为 73.9 岁,54.9%为女性。共有 254 例 CHD 事件发生。当 PRS 被加入到传统危险因素中时,它与 CHD 独立相关(风险比,1.24[95%CI,1.08-1.42],=0.002)。传统模型的曲线下面积为 70.53(95%CI,67.00-74.06),在加入 PRS 后增加到 71.78(95%CI,68.32-75.24,=0.019),表明预测得到改善。再分类也得到改善,因为加入 PRS 后传统模型的连续净再分类指数为 0.25(95%CI,0.15-0.28)。
CHD 的 PRS 在老年人中表现良好,并改善了对传统心血管危险因素的预测。我们的研究提供了证据,表明 CHD 的基因组风险预测在 70 岁及以上的人群中具有临床实用性。