Instituto de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC-CONICET), Ushuaia, Argentina.
J Anim Ecol. 2022 Mar;91(3):630-642. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13652. Epub 2022 Jan 9.
Local food webs result from a sequence of colonisations and extinctions by species from the regional pool or metaweb, that is, the assembly process. Assembly is theorised to be a selective process: whether or not certain species or network structures can persist is partly determined by local processes including habitat filtering and dynamical constraints. Consequently, local food web structure should reflect these processes. The goal of this study was to test evidence for these selective processes by comparing the structural properties of real food webs to the expected distribution given the metaweb. We were particularly interested in ecological dynamics; if the network properties commonly associated with dynamical stability are indeed the result of stability constraints, then they should deviate from expectation in the direction predicted by theory. To create a null expectation, we used the novel approach of randomly assembling model webs by drawing species and interactions from the empirical metaweb. The assembly model permitted colonisation and extinction, and required a consumer species to have at least one prey, but had no habitat type nor population dynamical constraints. Three datasets were used: (a) the marine Antarctic metaweb, with two local food webs; (b) the 50 lakes of the Adirondacks; and (c) the arthropod community from Florida Keys' classic defaunation experiment. Contrary to our expectations, we found that there were almost no differences between empirical webs and those resulting from the null assembly model. Few empirical food webs showed significant differences with network properties, motif representations and topological roles. Network properties associated with stability did not deviate from expectation in the direction predicted by theory. Our results suggest that-for the commonly used metrics we considered-local food web structure is not strongly influenced by dynamical nor habitat restrictions. Instead, the structure is inherited from the metaweb. This suggests that the network properties typically attributed as causes or consequences of ecological stability are instead a by-product of the assembly process (i.e. spandrels), and may potentially be too coarse to detect the true signal of dynamical constraint.
本地食物网是由来自区域物种库或元生物网(即组装过程)的物种进行一系列殖民和灭绝而产生的。组装过程被理论化为一个选择性过程:某些物种或网络结构是否能够持续存在,部分取决于包括栖息地过滤和动态约束在内的本地过程。因此,本地食物网结构应该反映这些过程。本研究的目的是通过将真实食物网的结构特性与元生物网给出的预期分布进行比较,来检验这些选择性过程的证据。我们特别关注生态动态;如果与动态稳定性相关的网络特性确实是稳定性约束的结果,那么它们应该偏离理论预测的方向。为了创建一个空的期望,我们使用了一种新颖的方法,即通过从经验元生物网中抽取物种和相互作用来随机组装模型网络。组装模型允许殖民和灭绝,并且要求消费者物种至少有一种猎物,但没有栖息地类型或种群动态约束。我们使用了三个数据集:(a)海洋南极元生物网,其中包含两个本地食物网;(b)阿迪朗达克的 50 个湖泊;(c)佛罗里达群岛经典除虫实验中的节肢动物群落。与我们的预期相反,我们发现经验网络与来自空组装模型的网络之间几乎没有差异。很少有经验食物网在网络特性、基序表示和拓扑角色方面表现出显著差异。与稳定性相关的网络特性在理论预测的方向上没有偏离预期。我们的结果表明,对于我们考虑的常用指标,本地食物网结构不受动态或栖息地限制的强烈影响。相反,结构是从元生物网继承而来的。这表明通常归因于生态稳定性的原因或后果的网络特性实际上是组装过程的副产品(即结构上的剩余),并且可能太粗糙而无法检测到动态约束的真正信号。