Suppr超能文献

健康成年人中使用Goldmann压平眼压计、Corvis ST眼压计和气流眼压计测量眼压的比较。

Comparison of intraocular pressure obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer, Corvis ST and an airpuff tonometer in healthy adults.

作者信息

Karmiris Efthymios, Tsiripidis Konstantinos, Gartaganis Panos S, Totou Styliani, Vasilopoulou Maria-Giannoula, Patelis Andreas, Giannakis Ioannis, Chalkiadaki Evangelia

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, 251 Hellenic Airforce General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec 27:11206721211069227. doi: 10.1177/11206721211069227.

Abstract

To assess the agreement among four types of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements: IOP obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer (IOP-GAT),IOP obtained by an air-puff tonometer (Nidek NT-510)(IOP-NCT), the non-corrected IOP obtained by the Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (IOP-Corvis) and the biomechanically corrected IOP obtained by the Corvis ST (bIOP-Corvis) in healthy patients with a broad spectrum of IOP values. This prospective, observational study recruited 113 healthy individuals. Each patient underwent IOP evaluation via GAT, Nidek NT-510 and Corvis ST. Difference in mean in IOP readings was assessed by one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).Tonometer intermethod agreement was assessed by the Bland-Altman method. The difference between the four IOP measurements was correlated against corneal (CCT) and age with Pearson's correlation test. IOP-Corvis showed the highest values (16.59  ±  3.08 mmHg),followed by IOP-NCT (16.05  ±  3.43 mmHg), IOP-GAT (15.62 ± 3.08 mmHg) and bIOP-Corvis (15.10 ± 2.67 mmHg).There were statistically significant differences in IOP measurements among all the ANOVA pairwise comparisons except between IOP-GAT and bIOP-Corvis ( = 0.07),as well as between IOP-GAT and IOP-NCT ( = 0.25). Bland Altman analysis revealed a notable bias (all  < 0.05) among IOP-GAT and bIOP-Corvis, IOP-GAT and IOP-Corvis, IOP-GAT and IOP-NCT, bIOP-Corvis and IOP-Corvis, bIOP-Corvis and IOP-NCT,IOP-Corvis and IOP-NCT of 0.51, -0.97, -0.43, -1.49, -0.95, 0.53 mmHg respectively. We observed a strong correlation of the difference between bIOP-Corvis and IOP-Corvis with CCT and patient age. Compared with GAT and Nidek NT-510, the Corvis-derived IOPs were recorded either the highest as IOP-Corvis or the lowest as bIOP-Corvis. Even if the differences among the tonometers were relatively small, the IOP values obtained with the Corvis ST, NCT and GAT were not interchangeable.

摘要

评估四种眼压(IOP)测量方法之间的一致性:通过Goldmann压平眼压计获得的眼压(IOP-GAT)、通过气吹眼压计(Nidek NT-510)获得的眼压(IOP-NCT)、通过角膜可视化Scheimpflug技术获得的未校正眼压(IOP-Corvis)以及通过Corvis ST获得的生物力学校正眼压(bIOP-Corvis),研究对象为眼压值范围广泛的健康患者。这项前瞻性观察性研究招募了113名健康个体。每位患者均通过GAT、Nidek NT-510和Corvis ST进行眼压评估。通过单向重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)评估眼压读数的平均差异。采用Bland-Altman方法评估眼压计测量方法之间的一致性。通过Pearson相关检验评估四种眼压测量值之间的差异与角膜厚度(CCT)和年龄的相关性。IOP-Corvis显示出最高值(16.59±3.08 mmHg),其次是IOP-NCT(16.05±3.43 mmHg)、IOP-GAT(15.62±3.08 mmHg)和bIOP-Corvis(15.10±2.67 mmHg)。除了IOP-GAT和bIOP-Corvis之间(P = 0.07)以及IOP-GAT和IOP-NCT之间(P = 0.25)外,所有ANOVA两两比较的眼压测量值均存在统计学显著差异。Bland Altman分析显示,IOP-GAT和bIOP-Corvis、IOP-GAT和IOP-Corvis、IOP-GAT和IOP-NCT、bIOP-Corvis和IOP-Corvis、bIOP-Corvis和IOP-NCT、IOP-Corvis和IOP-NCT之间分别存在显著偏差(所有P < 0.05),偏差分别为0.51、-0.97、-0.43、-1.49、-0.95、0.53 mmHg。我们观察到bIOP-Corvis和IOP-Corvis之间的差异与CCT和患者年龄密切相关。与GAT和Nidek NT-510相比,Corvis衍生的眼压值要么作为IOP-Corvis记录为最高,要么作为bIOP-Corvis记录为最低。即使眼压计之间的差异相对较小,通过Corvis ST、NCT和GAT获得的确压值也不可互换。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验