Suppr超能文献

泛基因型索磷布韦方案治疗中国慢性丙型肝炎病毒 1 型感染的成本效果分析。

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pan-Genotypic Sofosbuvir-Based Regimens for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection in China.

机构信息

Department of Public Administration, Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.

Department of Pathology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 9;9:779215. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.779215. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 is the most prevalent HCV infection in China. Sofosbuvir-based direct antiviral agent (DAA) regimens are the current mainstays of treatment. Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) and sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) regimens became reimbursable in China in 2020. Thus, this study aimed to identify the optimal SOF-based regimen and to inform efficient use of healthcare resources by optimizing DAA use in treating HCV genotype 1. A modeling-based cost-utility analysis was conducted from the payer's perspective targeting adult Chinese patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. Direct medical costs and health utilities were inputted into a Markov model to simulate lifetime experiences of chronically infected HCV patients after receiving SOF/LDV, SOF/VEL or the traditional strategy of pegylated interferon (pegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV). Discounted lifetime cost and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were computed and compared to generate the incremental cost utility ratio (ICUR). An ICUR below the threshold of 31,500 $/QALY suggests cost-effectiveness. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the robustness of model findings. Both SOF/LDV and SOF/VEL regimens were dominant to the pegIFN + RBV regimen by creating more QALYs and incurring less cost. SOF/LDV produced 0.542 more QALYs but cost $10,390 less than pegIFN + RBV. Relative to SOF/LDV, SOF/VEL had an ICUR of 168,239 $/QALY which did not meet the cost-effectiveness standard. Therefore SOF/LDV was the optimal strategy. These findings were robust to linear and random variations of model parameters. However, reducing the SOF/VEL price by 40% would make this regimen the most cost-effective option. SOF/LDV was found to be the most cost-effective treatment, and SOF/VEL was also economically dominant to pegIFN + RBV. These findings indicated that replacing pegIFN + RBV with DAA regimens could be a promising strategy.

摘要

丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)基因型 1 是中国最常见的 HCV 感染。基于索非布韦的直接抗病毒药物(DAA)方案是目前治疗的主要方法。2020 年,索非布韦/维帕他韦(SOF/VEL)和索非布韦/雷迪帕韦(SOF/LDV)方案在中国被纳入医保。因此,本研究旨在确定最佳的 SOF 方案,并通过优化 DAA 在治疗 HCV 基因型 1 中的应用来优化医疗资源的利用。从支付者的角度出发,针对中国慢性 HCV 基因型 1 感染的成年患者,进行了基于模型的成本效用分析。直接医疗成本和健康效用被输入到一个马尔可夫模型中,以模拟接受 SOF/LDV、SOF/VEL 或传统聚乙二醇干扰素(pegIFN)+利巴韦林(RBV)方案治疗的慢性 HCV 感染患者的终生经历。计算并比较了终生成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs),以生成增量成本效用比(ICUR)。如果 ICUR 低于 31500 美元/QALY,则表明具有成本效益。进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析,以检查模型结果的稳健性。SOF/LDV 和 SOF/VEL 方案均优于 pegIFN+RBV 方案,因为前者可获得更多的 QALYs 且成本更低。SOF/LDV 方案产生了 0.542 个额外的 QALYs,但成本比 pegIFN+RBV 方案低 10390 美元。与 SOF/LDV 相比,SOF/VEL 的 ICUR 为 168239 美元/QALY,未达到成本效益标准。因此,SOF/LDV 是最佳方案。这些发现对模型参数的线性和随机变化具有稳健性。然而,将 SOF/VEL 的价格降低 40%,将使其成为最具成本效益的选择。SOF/LDV 被发现是最具成本效益的治疗方法,SOF/VEL 也在经济上优于 pegIFN+RBV。这些发现表明,用 DAA 方案替代 pegIFN+RBV 可能是一种很有前途的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04ff/8695807/a47d9b910051/fpubh-09-779215-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验