Diversifying the Bioethics Funding Landscape: The Case of TMS.
作者信息
Dubljević Veljko, Young Jonathan R, Appelbaum L Gregory
机构信息
North Carolina State University.
Duke University.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Jan;22(1):28-30. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.2001106.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Diversifying the Bioethics Funding Landscape: The Case of TMS.多元化生物伦理学资金格局：以经颅磁刺激为例。
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Jan;22(1):28-30. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.2001106.
2
The revision of the French bioethics law and the questions it raises for the future of funding for egg freezing.法国生物伦理法的修订及其对卵子冷冻未来资金问题的影响。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Apr;44(4):591-593. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
3
Bioethics, (Funding) Priorities, and the Perpetuation of Injustice.生物伦理学、（资金）优先事项与不公正的持续存在。
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Jan;22(1):6-13. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1867934. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
4
The greening of bioethics: corporate funding of bioethics research.生物伦理学的商业化：生物伦理学研究的企业资助
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1998 Summer;7(3):326-8. doi: 10.1017/s0963180198003144.
5
Psychoanalysis and bioethics: a Lacanian approach to bioethical discourse.精神分析与生物伦理学：一种拉康派的生物伦理话语研究方法。
Med Health Care Philos. 2016 Dec;19(4):605-621. doi: 10.1007/s11019-016-9698-1.
6
Injustice in Bioethics Research Funding: Going Further Upstream.
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Jan;22(1):33-35. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.2001104.
7
There Are Priorities and Then There Are : A Prior Question About the Perpetuation of Injustice Through Bioethics Research Funding.
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Jan;22(1):19-21. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.2002464.
8
Undoing Funding Injustices for Bioethics Research on Racial Justice.
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Jan;22(1):21-23. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.2001100.
9
When health means wealth, can bioethicists respond?当健康意味着财富时，生物伦理学家能做出回应吗？
Health Care Anal. 2001;9(2):213-28. doi: 10.1023/A:1011338404680.
10
On a communitarian approach to bioethics.论生命伦理学的共同体主义进路。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2011 Oct;32(5):363-74. doi: 10.1007/s11017-011-9187-8.
本文引用的文献
1
Bioethics, (Funding) Priorities, and the Perpetuation of Injustice.生物伦理学、（资金）优先事项与不公正的持续存在。
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Jan;22(1):6-13. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1867934. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
2
The Influence of Industry Sponsorship on the Research Agenda: A Scoping Review.产业资助对研究议程的影响：范围综述。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Nov;108(11):e9-e16. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304677. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
3
The Social Context of "Do-It-Yourself" Brain Stimulation: Neurohackers, Biohackers, and Lifehackers.“自己动手”进行脑部刺激的社会背景：神经黑客、生物黑客和生活黑客。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 May 10;11:224. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00224. eCollection 2017.
4
Can Neuroscience Contribute to Practical Ethics? A Critical Review and Discussion of the Methodological and Translational Challenges of the Neuroscience of Ethics.神经科学能为实践伦理学做出贡献吗？对伦理学神经科学的方法学及转化挑战的批判性综述与讨论。
Bioethics. 2017 Jun;31(5):328-337. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12357.
5
Fair Resource Allocation to Health Research: Priority Topics for Bioethics Scholarship.卫生研究的公平资源分配：生物伦理学学术研究的优先主题。
Bioethics. 2017 Jul;31(6):454-466. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12350. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
6
tDCS for Memory Enhancement: Analysis of the Speculative Aspects of Ethical Issues.用于增强记忆的经颅直流电刺激：伦理问题推测方面的分析。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jan 11;10:678. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00678. eCollection 2016.
7
Who is buying bioethics research?谁在资助生物伦理学研究？
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Aug;8(8):54-8; discussion W1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160802317982.
Zotero 插件