Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Pittsburgh Liver Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Canarias, Spain.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Feb 1;117(2):301-310. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001596.
Several scoring systems predict mortality in alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), including the Maddrey discriminant function (mDF) and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score developed in the United States, Glasgow alcoholic hepatitis score in the United Kingdom, and age, bilirubin, international normalized ratio, and creatinine score in Spain. To date, no global studies have examined the utility of these scores, nor has the MELD-sodium been evaluated for outcome prediction in AH. In this study, we assessed the accuracy of different scores to predict short-term mortality in AH and investigated additional factors to improve mortality prediction.
Patients admitted to hospital with a definite or probable AH were recruited by 85 tertiary centers in 11 countries and across 3 continents. Baseline demographic and laboratory variables were obtained. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 28 and 90 days.
In total, 3,101 patients were eligible for inclusion. After exclusions (n = 520), 2,581 patients were enrolled (74.4% male, median age 48 years, interquartile range 40.9-55.0 years). The median MELD score was 23.5 (interquartile range 20.5-27.8). Mortality at 28 and 90 days was 20% and 30.9%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for 28-day mortality ranged from 0.776 for MELD-sodium to 0.701 for mDF, and for 90-day mortality, it ranged from 0.773 for MELD to 0.709 for mDF. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for mDF to predict death was significantly lower than all other scores. Age added to MELD obtained only a small improvement of AUC.
These results suggest that the mDF score should no longer be used to assess AH's prognosis. The MELD score has the best performance in predicting short-term mortality.
有几种评分系统可预测酒精性肝炎(AH)患者的死亡率,包括美国开发的 Maddrey 判别函数(mDF)和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分、英国的格拉斯哥酒精性肝炎评分以及西班牙的年龄、胆红素、国际标准化比值和肌酐评分。迄今为止,尚无全球研究评估这些评分的效用,也没有评估 MELD 钠在 AH 预后预测中的作用。本研究评估了不同评分系统预测 AH 短期死亡率的准确性,并探讨了改善死亡率预测的其他因素。
通过 85 家三级中心在 11 个国家和 3 大洲招募因明确或可能的 AH 住院的患者。获得基线人口统计学和实验室变量。主要结局是 28 天和 90 天的全因死亡率。
共纳入 3101 例患者。排除(n = 520)后,共纳入 2581 例患者(74.4%为男性,中位年龄 48 岁,四分位距 40.9-55.0 岁)。中位 MELD 评分为 23.5(四分位距 20.5-27.8)。28 天和 90 天的死亡率分别为 20%和 30.9%。28 天死亡率的受试者工作特征曲线下面积范围为 MELD 钠的 0.776 至 mDF 的 0.701,90 天死亡率的范围为 MELD 的 0.773 至 mDF 的 0.709。mDF 预测死亡的受试者工作特征曲线下面积明显低于其他所有评分。年龄增加到 MELD 仅略微提高 AUC。
这些结果表明,mDF 评分不应再用于评估 AH 的预后。MELD 评分在预测短期死亡率方面表现最佳。