• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[德国的自杀情况:官方死因统计结果]

[Suicides in Germany: results from the official cause of death statistics].

作者信息

Schelhase Torsten

机构信息

H11 Gesundheitsstatistiken, Statistisches Bundesamt, Zweigstelle Bonn, Graurheindorfer Straße 198, 53117, Bonn, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Jan;65(1):3-10. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03470-2. Epub 2021 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00103-021-03470-2
PMID:34962579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8732928/
Abstract

The cause of death statistics is an elementary basis for determining important indicators such as death rates, years of life lost, and avoidable deaths as well as their changes over time. The results are used in epidemiological and medical research and provide important recommendations for prevention programs and for health policy in general.This article first gives an overview of the history, legal basis, and methodology of the cause of death statistics in Germany. This is followed by the presentation of the data on suicides in Germany with a focus on the year 2019. These data are mapped based on the characteristics of age, gender, region, and method of suicide. Comparisons with older data available since 1980 are made. The outlook gives an overview of the further development of the cause of death statistics, the reasons for current weaknesses in the data collection process, and possible solutions.

摘要

死亡原因统计是确定死亡率、寿命损失年数、可避免死亡及其随时间变化等重要指标的基本依据。这些结果用于流行病学和医学研究,并为预防计划和总体卫生政策提供重要建议。本文首先概述了德国死亡原因统计的历史、法律依据和方法。随后介绍了德国的自杀数据,重点是2019年。这些数据根据年龄、性别、地区和自杀方法的特征进行了梳理。并与1980年以来的旧数据进行了比较。展望部分概述了死亡原因统计的进一步发展、数据收集过程中当前存在不足的原因以及可能的解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5dc/8732928/aefecbb92760/103_2021_3470_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5dc/8732928/ecf62d7be3e9/103_2021_3470_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5dc/8732928/aefecbb92760/103_2021_3470_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5dc/8732928/ecf62d7be3e9/103_2021_3470_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5dc/8732928/aefecbb92760/103_2021_3470_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
[Suicides in Germany: results from the official cause of death statistics].[德国的自杀情况:官方死因统计结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Jan;65(1):3-10. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03470-2. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
2
A consideration of the validity and reliability of suicide mortality data.对自杀死亡率数据的有效性和可靠性的考量。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1989 Spring;19(1):1-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278x.1989.tb00362.x.
3
[ICD coding of causes of death: challenges for calculating the burden of disease in Germany].[死亡原因的国际疾病分类编码:德国疾病负担计算面临的挑战]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 Dec;62(12):1485-1492. doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-03054-1.
4
Adequacy of official suicide statistics for scientific research and public policy.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1993 Winter;23(4):307-19.
5
[Data by the Frankfurt Network for Suicide Prevention (FRANS): Suicide Statistics 2014-2017].[法兰克福自杀预防网络(FRANS)的数据:2014 - 2017年自杀统计数据]
Psychiatr Prax. 2020 Oct;47(7):376-382. doi: 10.1055/a-1142-0965. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
6
Comparing ICD-9 and ICD-10: the impact on intentional and unintentional injury mortality statistics in Italy and Norway.比较 ICD-9 和 ICD-10:对意大利和挪威的故意伤害和意外伤害死亡率统计的影响。
Injury. 2013 Jan;44(1):132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
7
Are suicide deaths under-reported? Nationwide re-evaluations of 1800 deaths in Scandinavia.自杀死亡人数是否存在漏报?对斯堪的纳维亚地区1800例死亡病例进行的全国性重新评估。
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 25;5(11):e009120. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009120.
8
[Suicide in the police crime statistics].[警方犯罪统计中的自杀情况]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Jan;65(1):11-17. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03463-1. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
9
Can child deaths be prevented? The Arizona Child Fatality Review Program experience.儿童死亡可以预防吗?亚利桑那州儿童死亡审查项目的经验。
Pediatrics. 2002 Jul;110(1 Pt 1):e11. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.1.e11.
10
What Are Reasons for the Large Gender Differences in the Lethality of Suicidal Acts? An Epidemiological Analysis in Four European Countries.自杀行为致死率中巨大性别差异的原因是什么?四个欧洲国家的流行病学分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0129062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129062. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Formative Evaluation of Suicide Prevention Websites for Men: Qualitative Study with Men at Risk of Suicide and with Potential Gatekeepers.男性自杀预防网站的形成性评估:对有自杀风险的男性和潜在守门人的定性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 26;9:e59829. doi: 10.2196/59829.
2
Injury patterns of suicide attempts in the head and neck area-a retrospective analysis over 15 years.头颈部自杀未遂的损伤模式——一项15年的回顾性分析
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 May;282(5):2571-2580. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-09138-2. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
3
Increase in Search Interest for "Suicide" and "Depression" for Particular Days of the Week and Times of Day: Analysis Based on Google Trends.

本文引用的文献

1
[Development of an electronic death certificate for Germany].[德国电子死亡证明的开发]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 Dec;62(12):1493-1499. doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-03055-0.
一周中特定日期和一天中特定时间对“自杀”和“抑郁”搜索兴趣的增加:基于谷歌趋势的分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 26;12(1):191. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010191.