• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单病例实验设计数据的结构化视觉分析:进展与技术进步

Structured visual analysis of single-case experimental design data: Developments and technological advancements.

作者信息

Dowdy Art, Jessel Joshua, Saini Valdeep, Peltier Corey

机构信息

Department of Teaching and Learning, Temple University.

Department of Psychology, Queens College.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2022 Mar;55(2):451-462. doi: 10.1002/jaba.899. Epub 2021 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1002/jaba.899
PMID:34962646
Abstract

Visual analysis is the primary method used to interpret single-case experimental design (SCED) data in applied behavior analysis. Research shows that agreement between visual analysts can be suboptimal at times. To address the inconsistent interpretations of SCED data, recent structured visual-analysis technological advancements have been developed. To assess the extent to which structured visual analysis is used to guide or supplement applied behavior analysts' interpretation of SCED graphs, a systematic review between the years of 2015 to 2020 in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis was conducted. Findings showed that despite recent efforts to develop structured visual-analysis tools and criteria, these methods are rarely used to analyze SCED data. An overview of structured visual-analysis tools is shared, their utility is delineated, common characteristics are brought to light, and future directions for both research and their clinical use are highlighted.

摘要

视觉分析是应用行为分析中用于解释单案例实验设计(SCED)数据的主要方法。研究表明,视觉分析人员之间的一致性有时可能不太理想。为了解决对SCED数据解释不一致的问题,最近已经开发出了结构化视觉分析技术。为了评估结构化视觉分析在多大程度上被用于指导或补充应用行为分析师对SCED图表的解释,对2015年至2020年期间《应用行为分析杂志》进行了系统综述。研究结果表明,尽管最近努力开发结构化视觉分析工具和标准,但这些方法很少用于分析SCED数据。本文分享了结构化视觉分析工具的概述,阐述了它们的效用,揭示了共同特征,并突出了研究及其临床应用的未来方向。

相似文献

1
Structured visual analysis of single-case experimental design data: Developments and technological advancements.单病例实验设计数据的结构化视觉分析:进展与技术进步
J Appl Behav Anal. 2022 Mar;55(2):451-462. doi: 10.1002/jaba.899. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
2
Meta-analyses and effect sizes in applied behavior analysis: A review and discussion.元分析和应用行为分析中的效应量:综述与讨论。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Sep;54(4):1317-1340. doi: 10.1002/jaba.862. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
3
A concise review of recent advancements in the graphical training of behavior analysts.行为分析师图形训练近期进展的简要综述。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2022 Oct;55(4):1349-1354. doi: 10.1002/jaba.943. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
4
Development of an in-vivo metric to aid visual inspection of single-case design data: Do we need to run more sessions?开发一种用于辅助单案例设计数据视觉检查的体内度量标准:我们是否需要运行更多的实验?
Behav Res Ther. 2018 Mar;102:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
5
An exploration of the interrater agreement of visual analysis with and without context.探索有和没有上下文的视觉分析的评分者间一致性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jan;53(1):572-583. doi: 10.1002/jaba.560. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
6
A systematic review of applied single-case research published between 2016 and 2018: Study designs, randomization, data aspects, and data analysis.2016 年至 2018 年发表的应用单病例研究的系统评价:研究设计、随机化、数据方面和数据分析。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1371-1384. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01502-4. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
7
The influence of data characteristics on interrater agreement among visual analysts.数据特征对视觉分析师之间评分者间一致性的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Apr;56(2):365-376. doi: 10.1002/jaba.980. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
8
Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards.单病例实验设计:已发表研究和现行标准的系统评价。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Dec;17(4):510-50. doi: 10.1037/a0029312. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
9
Machine Learning to Analyze Single-Case Data: A Proof of Concept.机器学习分析单病例数据:概念验证
Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Jan 21;43(1):21-38. doi: 10.1007/s40614-020-00244-0. eCollection 2020 Mar.
10
Interrater agreement between visual analysts of single-case data: a meta-analysis.单病例数据视觉分析师之间的评分者间一致性:一项荟萃分析。
Behav Modif. 2015 Jul;39(4):510-41. doi: 10.1177/0145445515581327. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Generalized Linear Mixed Effects Modeling (GLMM) of Functional Analysis Graphical Construction Elements on Visual Analysis.视觉分析中功能分析图形构建元素的广义线性混合效应建模
Perspect Behav Sci. 2024 Apr 30;47(2):499-521. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00406-4. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Validating a Computerized Program for Supporting Visual Analysis During Functional Analysis: The Problem Behavior Multilevel Interpreter (PB.MI).验证功能分析期间支持视觉分析的计算机程序:问题行为多级解释器(PB.MI)。
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Oct 14;15(2):485-494. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00656-7. eCollection 2022 Jun.