• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据真实世界的数据,肾功能障碍是颈动脉支架置入术后最强的预后因素。

Renal Dysfunction is the Strongest Prognostic Factor After Carotid Artery Stenting According to Real-World Data.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Yokohama Brain and Spine Center, 1-2-1, Takigashira, Isogo, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 2350012, Japan.

Department of Neurosurgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama, 2360004, Japan.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Mar;31(3):106269. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106269. Epub 2021 Dec 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106269
PMID:34963079
Abstract

PURPOSE

Through the progression of devices, the adaptation of carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been expanded according to the non-inferiority of CAS for carotid endarterectomy reported by several randomized control trials. To maintain favorable outcomes, identifying prognostic factors is essential for optimizing treatment indications and periprocedural management. This study focused on the prognostic factors of CAS using real-world data.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter cohort study aimed to identify the prognostic factors after CAS using real-world data from the stroke registry of Yokohama (STrOke Registry of Yokohama; STORY) from January 1, 2018 to May 31, 2021. Patient characteristics, procedural factors, complications, and prognoses were collected using medical records.

RESULTS

Data from 107 patients were enrolled in this study after excluding those with insufficient data (2 cases). The mean participant age was 74.9±8.2 years, and 66 patients (61.7%) were symptomatic. Symptomatic lesions were a significant prognostic factor in the overall analysis (p=0.003). A multivariate analysis showed that the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (odds ratio: 1.11, p=0.003) and staged CAS (odds ratio: 38.9, p=0.04) were independent prognostic factors. The odds ratio and relative risk of mRS deterioration when eGFR was under 49 mL/min/1.73 m compared with when eGFR was above 49 mL/min/1.73 m were 5.2 and 3.74, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world multicenter study, we established independent prognostic factors for CAS using high totality data. For patients with symptomatic lesions and low eGFR (≤49 mL/min/1.73 m), indication for treatment should be considered strictly.

摘要

目的

随着器械的进步,根据几项随机对照试验报道的颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)与颈动脉内膜切除术的非劣效性,CAS 的适应证不断扩大。为了保持良好的结果,确定预后因素对于优化治疗适应证和围手术期管理至关重要。本研究旨在使用真实世界数据探讨 CAS 的预后因素。

方法

本回顾性多中心队列研究使用 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 5 月 31 日横浜卒中登记(STrOke Registry of Yokohama;STORY)中的真实世界数据,旨在确定 CAS 后的预后因素。使用病历收集患者特征、手术因素、并发症和预后。

结果

在排除数据不足的 2 例患者后,本研究共纳入 107 例患者。患者平均年龄为 74.9±8.2 岁,66 例(61.7%)为症状性病变。症状性病变是总分析中的显著预后因素(p=0.003)。多变量分析显示,估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)(比值比:1.11,p=0.003)和分期 CAS(比值比:38.9,p=0.04)是独立的预后因素。与 eGFR 大于 49 mL/min/1.73 m 相比,eGFR 小于等于 49 mL/min/1.73 m 时 mRS 恶化的比值比和相对风险分别为 5.2 和 3.74。

结论

在这项真实世界的多中心研究中,我们使用高总体数据确定了 CAS 的独立预后因素。对于有症状病变和低 eGFR(≤49 mL/min/1.73 m)的患者,应严格考虑治疗适应证。

相似文献

1
Renal Dysfunction is the Strongest Prognostic Factor After Carotid Artery Stenting According to Real-World Data.根据真实世界的数据,肾功能障碍是颈动脉支架置入术后最强的预后因素。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Mar;31(3):106269. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106269. Epub 2021 Dec 25.
2
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术比较(国际颈动脉支架置入研究):一项包含成本效益分析的随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Mar;20(20):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta20200.
3
Influence of multiple stents on periprocedural stroke after carotid artery stenting in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial (CREST).颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄试验(CREST)中,颈动脉支架置入术后多发性支架对围手术期卒中的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Mar;69(3):800-806. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.221. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
4
Nationwide Trends in Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the Post-CREST Era.全国范围内 CREST 时代后颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术的趋势。
Stroke. 2020 Feb;51(2):579-587. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027388. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
5
Analysis of Florida and New York state hospital discharges suggests that carotid stenting in symptomatic women is associated with significant increase in mortality and perioperative morbidity compared with carotid endarterectomy.对佛罗里达州和纽约州医院出院患者的分析表明,与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,症状性女性颈动脉支架置入术与死亡率和围手术期发病率显著增加相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Aug;56(2):334-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.066. Epub 2012 May 12.
6
Usefulness of Early Stenting for Symptomatic Extracranial Carotid Stenosis.早期支架置入术对症状性颅外颈动脉狭窄的有效性
World Neurosurg. 2016 Dec;96:334-339. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
7
Long-Term Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting for Carotid Artery Stenosis: Real-World Status in Japan.颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄的长期疗效:日本的真实情况
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Feb;25(2):360-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
8
Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for the treatment of both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis: 2 years' experience in a high-volume center.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄患者:一家大型中心的2年经验
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018 Dec;27(12):1691-1695. doi: 10.17219/acem/75902.
9
Remote pre-procedural ischemic stroke as the greatest risk in carotid‑stenting‑associated stroke and death: a single center's experience.远程术前缺血性卒中是颈动脉支架置入相关卒中和死亡的最大风险:单中心经验
Int Angiol. 2017 Aug;36(4):306-315. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.16.03737-8. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
10
Peri-procedural Risk with Urgent Carotid Artery Stenting: A Population based Swedvasc Study.围手术期紧急颈动脉支架置入术的风险:基于人群的 Swedvasc 研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 May;49(5):506-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Registry Studies of Stroke in Japan.日本的中风登记研究。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Sep 1;30(9):1095-1103. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV22008. Epub 2023 Jul 19.