• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜筛查对胃癌的有益影响及最佳筛查间隔:一项基于人群的研究。

Beneficial effects of endoscopic screening on gastric cancer and optimal screening interval: a population-based study.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.

Linqu County People's Hospital, Linqu, China.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2022 Sep;54(9):848-858. doi: 10.1055/a-1728-5673. Epub 2021 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1055/a-1728-5673
PMID:34963146
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of endoscopic screening on gastric cancer has not been widely investigated in China and the screening interval of repeated screening has not been determined. METHODS : In a population-based prospective study, we included 375,800 individuals, 14,670 of whom underwent endoscopic screening (2012-2018). We assessed the associations between endoscopic screening and risk of incident gastric cancer and gastric cancer-specific mortality, and examined changes in overall survival and disease-specific survival following screening. The optimal screening interval for repeated endoscopy for early detection of gastric cancer was explored. RESULTS : Ever receiving endoscopic screening significantly decreased the risk of invasive gastric cancer (age- and sex-adjusted relative risk [RR] 0.69, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.92) and gastric cancer-specific mortality (RR 0.33, 95 %CI 0.20-0.56), particularly for noncardia gastric cancer. Repeated screening strengthened the beneficial effect on invasive gastric cancer-specific mortality of one-time screening. Among invasive gastric cancers, screening-detected individuals had significantly better overall survival (RR 0.18, 95 %CI 0.13-0.25) and disease-specific survival (RR 0.18, 95 %CI 0.13-0.25) than unscreened individuals, particularly for those receiving repeated endoscopy. For individuals with intestinal metaplasia or low grade intraepithelial neoplasia, repeated endoscopy at an interval of < 2 years, particularly within 1 year, significantly enhanced the detection of early gastric cancer, compared with repeated screening after 2 years (-trend = 0.02). CONCLUSION : Endoscopic screening prevented gastric cancer occurrence and death, and improved its prognosis in a population-based study. Repeated endoscopy enhanced the effectiveness. Screening interval should be based on gastric lesion severity.

摘要

背景

内镜筛查在胃癌中的效果在中国尚未得到广泛研究,且重复筛查的间隔时间尚未确定。方法:在一项基于人群的前瞻性研究中,我们纳入了 375800 人,其中 14670 人接受了内镜筛查(2012-2018 年)。我们评估了内镜筛查与胃癌发病风险和胃癌特异性死亡率之间的关系,并检查了筛查后总体生存率和疾病特异性生存率的变化。还探讨了重复内镜检查以早期发现胃癌的最佳筛查间隔。结果:接受过内镜筛查与侵袭性胃癌(年龄和性别校正的相对风险 [RR] 0.69,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.52-0.92)和胃癌特异性死亡率(RR 0.33,95%CI 0.20-0.56)显著降低相关,特别是非贲门胃癌。重复筛查加强了一次性筛查对侵袭性胃癌特异性死亡率的有益作用。在侵袭性胃癌中,筛查检出者的总体生存率(RR 0.18,95%CI 0.13-0.25)和疾病特异性生存率(RR 0.18,95%CI 0.13-0.25)显著优于未筛查者,尤其是那些接受重复内镜检查者。对于肠上皮化生或低级别上皮内瘤变者,与 2 年后重复内镜检查相比,间隔时间<2 年、尤其是 1 年内重复内镜检查可显著提高早期胃癌的检出率(-趋势=0.02)。结论:在基于人群的研究中,内镜筛查可预防胃癌发生和死亡,并改善其预后。重复内镜检查可提高其效果。筛查间隔应基于胃病变严重程度。

相似文献

1
Beneficial effects of endoscopic screening on gastric cancer and optimal screening interval: a population-based study.内镜筛查对胃癌的有益影响及最佳筛查间隔:一项基于人群的研究。
Endoscopy. 2022 Sep;54(9):848-858. doi: 10.1055/a-1728-5673. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
2
Endoscopic Screening in Asian Countries Is Associated With Reduced Gastric Cancer Mortality: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.亚洲国家的内镜筛查与胃癌死亡率降低相关:一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Aug;155(2):347-354.e9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
3
Effectiveness of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program in Reducing Gastric Cancer Mortality.韩国国家癌症筛查计划在降低胃癌死亡率方面的效果。
Gastroenterology. 2017 May;152(6):1319-1328.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.01.029. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
4
Survival analysis of patients with interval cancer undergoing gastric cancer screening by endoscopy.接受内镜胃癌筛查的间期癌患者的生存分析。
PLoS One. 2015 May 29;10(5):e0126796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126796. eCollection 2015.
5
Opportunistic upper endoscopy during colonoscopy as a screening strategy for countries with intermediate gastric cancer risk.在胃癌风险中等的国家,将内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中的机会性上消化道内镜检查作为筛查策略。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Apr;36(4):1081-1087. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15290. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
6
Mortality reduction from gastric cancer by endoscopic and radiographic screening.通过内镜和影像学筛查降低胃癌死亡率。
Cancer Sci. 2015 Dec;106(12):1744-9. doi: 10.1111/cas.12829. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
7
Optimal interval of endoscopic screening based on stage distributions of detected gastric cancers.基于检出胃癌分期分布的内镜筛查最佳间隔。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Nov 9;17(1):740. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3710-x.
8
Effectiveness of endoscopic screening for gastric cancer: The Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study.内镜筛查胃癌的效果:日本基于公共卫生中心的前瞻性研究。
Cancer Sci. 2022 Nov;113(11):3922-3931. doi: 10.1111/cas.15545. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
9
Gastric cancer mortality related to direct radiographic and endoscopic screening: A retrospective study.胃癌死亡率与直接放射学和内镜筛查相关:一项回顾性研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep 7;27(33):5595-5609. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i33.5595.
10
Impact of endoscopic screening on mortality reduction from gastric cancer.内镜筛查对降低胃癌死亡率的影响。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 28;21(8):2460-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2460.

引用本文的文献

1
The Burden and Risk Factors of Gastric Cancer in Eastern Asia From 1990 to 2021: Longitudinal Observational Study of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.1990年至2021年东亚地区胃癌的负担及危险因素:全球疾病负担研究2021的纵向观察性研究
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Aug 8;11:e75728. doi: 10.2196/75728.
2
Safety and efficacy of apatinib in combination treatment versus apatinib as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer.阿帕替尼联合治疗与阿帕替尼作为晚期胃癌二线治疗的安全性和疗效
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 30;15:1587069. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1587069. eCollection 2025.
3
Plasma -aspartic acid predicts the risk of gastric cancer and modifies the primary prevention effect: a multistage metabolomic profiling and Mendelian randomization study.
血浆天冬氨酸可预测胃癌风险并改变一级预防效果:一项多阶段代谢组学分析与孟德尔随机化研究
Cancer Biol Med. 2025 Apr 15;22(5). doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0523.
4
Population structure of and antibiotic resistance-associated variants in a high-risk area of gastric cancer.胃癌高危地区的人群结构及抗生素耐药相关变异
J Clin Microbiol. 2025 May 14;63(5):e0003325. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00033-25. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
5
Comparing Participation and Interim Effectiveness of Endoscopy and Biomarker-Based Screening for Gastric Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.比较内镜检查与基于生物标志物的胃癌筛查的参与率和中期有效性:一项整群随机对照试验
J Cancer. 2024 Oct 7;15(18):6110-6121. doi: 10.7150/jca.99100. eCollection 2024.
6
Can patients with mild non-neoplastic lesions diagnosed at baseline screening be safely exempt from surveillance: evidence from multicenter community-based cohorts.基线筛查时诊断为轻度非肿瘤性病变的患者能否安全地免于监测:来自多中心社区队列的证据。
Sci China Life Sci. 2025 Jan;68(1):263-271. doi: 10.1007/s11427-023-2558-x. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
7
The spatiotemporal associations between esophageal and gastric cancers provide evidence for its joint endoscopic screening in China: a population-based study.食管癌和胃癌的时空关联为中国联合内镜筛查提供了证据:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Med. 2024 Sep 4;22(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03594-7.
8
Optimal Surveillance of Metachronous Gastric Lesion after Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer.早期胃癌内镜切除术后胃黏膜病变的最佳监测。
Gut Liver. 2024 Sep 15;18(5):781-788. doi: 10.5009/gnl240027. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
9
Gastric cancer prevention by community eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.社区消除幽门螺杆菌预防胃癌:一项整群随机对照试验。
Nat Med. 2024 Nov;30(11):3250-3260. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03153-w. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
10
Survival of patients with gastric cancer surgically treated at the National Cancer Center of China from 2011 to 2018 according to stage at diagnosis.2011年至2018年在中国国家癌症中心接受手术治疗的胃癌患者按诊断分期的生存率。
J Natl Cancer Cent. 2022 Jul 22;2(3):132-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2022.07.002. eCollection 2022 Sep.