• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国空军中针对18至20岁年轻人的基于小组的简短烟草干预措施的效果。

Efficacy of a group-based brief tobacco intervention among young adults aged 18-20 years in the US Air Force.

作者信息

Little Melissa A, Wang Xin-Qun, Fahey Margaret C, Wiseman Kara P, Pebley Kinsey, Klesges Robert C, Talcott Gerald W

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States.

University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, United States.

出版信息

Tob Induc Dis. 2021 Dec 8;19:95. doi: 10.18332/tid/143282. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.18332/tid/143282
PMID:34963775
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8653010/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Most smokers begin using tobacco before the age of 25 years, making it important to reduce tobacco use during adolescence and early adulthood. Rates of use are historically higher among military personnel. While 'Tobacco 21' made it illegal for US retailers to sell tobacco to those aged <21 years, the policy did not address cessation for current youth and young adult tobacco users. Additionally, there is limited research on cessation interventions among young adults under 21 years. The current study evaluated the efficacy of a group-based Brief Tobacco Intervention (BTI) among US Air Force trainees, who are predominantly aged 18-20 years and directly impacted by Tobacco 21 legislation.

METHODS

Participants were 2969 US Air Force Trainees from April 2017 through January 2018 cluster randomized to three conditions: 1) BTI + Airman's Guide to Remaining Tobacco Free (AG), 2) AG alone, and 3) the National Cancer Institute's Clearing the Air (CTA) pamphlet. To assess the efficacy of the interventions among people aged 18-20 years, a domain analysis (<21 years, n=2117; and ≥21 years, n=852) of a multinomial logistic regression model was run.

RESULTS

Mono tobacco users aged <21 years at baseline who received the BTI+AG had higher odds of quitting tobacco at 3 months (OR=2.13; 95% CI: 1.02-4.46). Dual and poly users aged <21 years at baseline who received the BTI+AG intervention had higher odds of reducing the number of tobacco products used at 3 months (OR=2.94; 95% CI: 1.03-8.37).

CONCLUSIONS

The BTI was effective for people aged 18-20 years. The current study offers insight into components of interventions that might be successful in helping this age group decrease tobacco use.

摘要

引言

大多数吸烟者在25岁之前就开始使用烟草,因此在青少年和成年早期减少烟草使用非常重要。从历史上看,军事人员的烟草使用率更高。虽然“21岁禁售烟草”政策使美国零售商向21岁以下人群销售烟草成为非法行为,但该政策并未涉及当前青少年和青年烟草使用者的戒烟问题。此外,关于21岁以下青年成人戒烟干预措施的研究有限。本研究评估了基于小组的简短烟草干预(BTI)对美国空军学员的效果,这些学员主要年龄在18 - 20岁,且直接受到“21岁禁售烟草”立法的影响。

方法

2017年4月至2018年1月期间,2969名美国空军学员被整群随机分为三种情况:1)BTI + 《空军人员保持无烟指南》(AG);2)仅AG;3)美国国立癌症研究所的《净化空气》(CTA)宣传册。为评估干预措施对18 - 20岁人群的效果,对多项逻辑回归模型进行了领域分析(<21岁,n = 2117;≥21岁,n = 852)。

结果

基线时年龄<21岁的单一烟草使用者接受BTI + AG后,在3个月时戒烟的几率更高(OR = 2.13;95% CI:1.02 - 4.46)。基线时年龄<21岁的双重和多重烟草使用者接受BTI + AG干预后,在3个月时减少所使用烟草产品数量的几率更高(OR = 2.94;95% CI:1.03 - 8.37)。

结论

BTI对18 - 20岁人群有效。本研究为可能成功帮助该年龄组减少烟草使用的干预措施组成部分提供了见解。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of a group-based brief tobacco intervention among young adults aged 18-20 years in the US Air Force.美国空军中针对18至20岁年轻人的基于小组的简短烟草干预措施的效果。
Tob Induc Dis. 2021 Dec 8;19:95. doi: 10.18332/tid/143282. eCollection 2021.
2
Evaluating the Effects of a Brief Tobacco Intervention in the US Air Force.评估美国空军中简短烟草干预的效果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Aug 24;22(9):1569-1577. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa001.
3
Efficacy of a Brief Tobacco Intervention for Tobacco and Nicotine Containing Product Use in the US Air Force.美国空军针对烟草及含尼古丁产品使用的简短烟草干预措施的效果
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):1142-9. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv242. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
4
Rationale, design, and methods for the development of a youth adapted Brief Tobacco Intervention plus automated text messaging for high school students.为高中生开发青少年适应的简短烟草干预加自动化短信的理由、设计和方法。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;119:106840. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106840. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
5
Interventions for waterpipe smoking cessation.水烟戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 7;6(6):CD005549. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005549.pub4.
6
Interventions for tobacco use cessation in people living with HIV.HIV 感染者的戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 5;8(8):CD011120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011120.pub3.
7
Motives for using electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) as a cessation tool are associated with tobacco abstinence at 1-year follow-up: A prospective investigation among young adults in the United States Air Force.将电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)用作戒烟工具的动机与1年随访时的烟草戒断情况相关:一项针对美国空军年轻成年人的前瞻性调查。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Sep 8;35:102399. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102399. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Tobacco cessation interventions for young people.针对年轻人的戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD003289. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003289.pub4.
9
The comparative effectiveness of two brief tobacco interventions in the U.S. Air Force: Perceived harm and intentions-to-use of tobacco products.美国空军中两种简短烟草干预措施的比较效果:对烟草产品的感知危害及使用意图
Tob Induc Dis. 2018 Jun 1;16:26. doi: 10.18332/tid/87142. eCollection 2018.
10
Interventions for waterpipe smoking cessation.水烟戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 31;2015(7):CD005549. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005549.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Motives of Tobacco Use Among Young Adults in the United States Air Force.美国空军中青年人吸烟的动机。
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Jul;37(6):778-785. doi: 10.1177/08901171231156527. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
2
Rationale, design, and methods for the development of a youth adapted Brief Tobacco Intervention plus automated text messaging for high school students.为高中生开发青少年适应的简短烟草干预加自动化短信的理由、设计和方法。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;119:106840. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106840. Epub 2022 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

1
"Nobody Views It As a Negative Thing to Smoke": A Qualitative Study of the Relationship Between United States Air Force Culture and Tobacco Use.“没人认为吸烟是件坏事”:关于美国空军文化与烟草使用之间关系的定性研究
Mil Psychol. 2021;33(6):409-416. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2021.1962189. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
2
Dual and polytobacco use after a period of enforced tobacco cessation.戒烟后同时使用和使用多种烟草制品。
Addict Behav. 2021 Dec;123:107077. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107077. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
3
Trends in Tobacco Use among Young Adults Presenting for Military Service in the United States Air Force between 2013 and 2018.2013年至2018年期间在美国空军服役的年轻成年人的烟草使用趋势。
Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(3):370-376. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2020.1868517. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
4
Is vaping cessation like smoking cessation? A qualitative study exploring the responses of youth and young adults who vape e-cigarettes.电子烟戒烟和香烟戒烟一样吗?一项探索吸电子烟的青少年和年轻人反应的定性研究。
Addict Behav. 2021 Feb;113:106687. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106687. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
5
Serum cotinine levels and nicotine addiction potential of e-cigarettes: an NHANES analysis.血清可替宁水平与电子烟尼古丁成瘾潜力:NHANES 分析。
Carcinogenesis. 2020 Oct 15;41(10):1454-1459. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgaa015.
6
Onset of Regular Smoking Before Age 21 and Subsequent Nicotine Dependence and Cessation Behavior Among US Adult Smokers.21 岁前开始规律吸烟与美国成年吸烟者后续尼古丁依赖和戒烟行为的关系。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Jan 16;17:E06. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.190176.
7
Evaluating the Effects of a Brief Tobacco Intervention in the US Air Force.评估美国空军中简短烟草干预的效果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Aug 24;22(9):1569-1577. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa001.
8
Tobacco Product Use and Associated Factors Among Middle and High School Students - 
United States, 2019.中学生烟草制品使用及相关因素分析- 
美国,2019 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019 Nov 6;68(12):1-22. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6812a1.
9
Tobacco Product Use and Cessation Indicators Among Adults - United States, 2018.《2018 年美国成年人烟草制品使用和戒烟指标》
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Nov 15;68(45):1013-1019. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6845a2.
10
Mobile phone text messaging and app-based interventions for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的手机短信和基于应用程序的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 22;10(10):CD006611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006611.pub5.