Department of Psychology, The University of Memphis, TN, USA.
School of Medicine Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, VA, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Jul;37(6):778-785. doi: 10.1177/08901171231156527. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
Research has focused on cigarette use motives and have not included military personnel. The current study assessed tobacco use motives for different products, and differences within males and females and those with different racial identities given historical disparities in tobacco use.
A cross-sectional survey about tobacco use was administered from October 2019 to February 2022.
Four Technical Training bases in the US.
Air Force Airmen who used tobacco (N = 3243).
Questions were about sociodemographic characteristics, tobacco use, and the Tobacco Motives Inventory (representing affect regulation, boredom, enhancement, and social motives).
Linear regressions assessed associations between overall tobacco use and motives. Stratified analyses assessed associations between tobacco use and motives among males and females, and individuals from different racial backgrounds. Logistic regressions assessed differences in motives and use of different tobacco products between "some day" and "everyday" users.
Overall, boredom ( = .09, = .01) and affect regulation ( = .05, = .00) motives were associated with higher tobacco use. Males and females and individuals from different racial backgrounds endorsed different motives, but all endorsed boredom as a motive for higher tobacco use. Individuals who used cigarettes, e-cigarettes, or smokeless tobacco "some days" endorsed higher social motives than everyday users, but everyday users endorsed different motives across products.
There are motives differentiating between "some day" and "everyday" users of tobacco products, which may need to be differentially targeted in intervention programs. Additionally, there are some overlapping motives (affect regulation, boredom) that may be beneficial to address with all tobacco users.
研究集中在吸烟动机上,并未包括军人。本研究评估了不同产品的吸烟动机,以及考虑到历史上吸烟存在差异,男性和女性以及不同种族身份的人之间的差异。
一项关于吸烟的横断面调查,于 2019 年 10 月至 2022 年 2 月进行。
美国的四个技术培训基地。
使用烟草的空军士兵(N = 3243)。
问题涉及社会人口统计学特征、吸烟情况以及烟草动机量表(代表情感调节、无聊、增强和社交动机)。
线性回归评估了总体吸烟与动机之间的关联。分层分析评估了男性和女性以及不同种族背景的个体之间吸烟与动机之间的关联。逻辑回归评估了不同烟草产品“有时”和“每天”使用者之间的动机和使用差异。
总体而言,无聊( =.09, =.01)和情感调节( =.05, =.00)动机与较高的吸烟量相关。男性和女性以及不同种族背景的个体认可不同的动机,但所有人都将无聊视为更高吸烟量的动机。有时使用香烟、电子烟或无烟烟草的个体比每天使用者更认可更高的社交动机,但每天使用者在不同产品之间认可不同的动机。
有一些动机可以区分“有时”和“每天”使用烟草产品的人,这可能需要在干预计划中针对不同人群进行有区别的目标设定。此外,还有一些重叠的动机(情感调节、无聊),可能对所有烟草使用者都有益。