University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA.
The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Jan;49(1):110-124. doi: 10.1177/01461672211060124. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
In social movements, activists may belong to either the disadvantaged or the advantaged group (e.g., Black racial justice activists or White racial justice activists). Across three experimental survey studies, we examined the content of these stereotypes by asking participants to freely generate a list of characteristics to describe each target group-a classic paradigm in stereotype research. Specifically, we examined the stereotypes applied to Black and White activists within racial justice movements (Study 1, = 154), female and male activists within feminist movements (Study 2, =134), and LBGT and straight activists within Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender movements (Study 3, =156). We found that the "activist" category was consistently differentiated into subcategories based on group status: Disadvantaged group activists were stereotyped as strong and aggressive, whereas advantaged group activists were stereotyped as altruistic and superficial. These findings underscore the importance of considering status differences to understand the social perception of activists.
在社会运动中,活动家可能属于弱势群体或优势群体(例如,黑人民权运动活动家和白人民权运动活动家)。在三项实验调查研究中,我们通过让参与者自由列出描述每个目标群体的特征来研究这些刻板印象的内容——这是刻板印象研究中的经典范例。具体来说,我们研究了种族正义运动中黑人(Study 1,n=154)和白人活动家(Study 1,n=154)、女权运动中女性(Study 2,n=134)和男性活动家(Study 2,n=134)以及女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别运动中男女同性恋(Study 3,n=156)活动家之间的刻板印象。我们发现,“活动家”类别始终根据群体地位分为亚类:弱势群体活动家被刻板地描述为坚强和激进,而优势群体活动家则被刻板地描述为利他主义和肤浅。这些发现强调了考虑地位差异对于理解公众对活动家的看法的重要性。