• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of ventricular tachycardia ablation vs. escalated antiarrhythmic drug therapy by location of myocardial infarction: a sub-study of the VANISH trial.心肌梗死后部位对室性心动过速消融与抗心律失常药物升级治疗效果的比较:VANISH 试验的一个亚研究。
Europace. 2022 Jul 15;24(6):948-958. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab298.
2
Ventricular Tachycardia and ICD Therapy Burden With Catheter Ablation Versus Escalated Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy.导管消融与升级抗心律失常药物治疗相比,与室性心动过速和 ICD 治疗负担。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Jun;9(6):808-821. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.01.030. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
3
Effect of Baseline Antiarrhythmic Drug on Outcomes With Ablation in Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia: A VANISH Substudy (Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Versus Escalated Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Ischemic Heart Disease).缺血性室性心动过速消融中基线抗心律失常药物对结局的影响:VANISH 亚研究(缺血性心脏病中室性心动过速消融与升级抗心律失常药物治疗的比较)。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Jan;11(1):e005663. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005663.
4
Ventricular tachycardia characteristics and outcomes with catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic therapy: insights from the VANISH trial.导管消融与抗心律失常治疗的室性心动过速特征和结局:来自 VANISH 试验的见解。
Europace. 2022 Jul 21;24(7):1112-1118. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab328.
5
Ventricular Tachycardia with ICD Shocks: When to Medicate and When to Ablate.伴有植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)电击的室性心动过速:何时药物治疗以及何时消融
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017 Sep 13;19(11):105. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0924-0.
6
Substrate Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Symptomatic Ventricular Tachycardia.基质消融与抗心律失常药物治疗有症状性室性心动过速。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Apr 19;79(15):1441-1453. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.050.
7
Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation versus Escalation of Antiarrhythmic Drugs.室性心动过速消融与抗心律失常药物升级。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 14;375(2):111-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513614. Epub 2016 May 5.
8
Clinical, procedural and long-term outcome of ischemic VT ablation in patients with previous anterior versus inferior myocardial infarction.既往前壁心肌梗死与下壁心肌梗死患者缺血性 VT 消融的临床、程序和长期结局。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Oct;109(10):1282-1291. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01622-z. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
9
Cost Effectiveness of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Versus Escalation of Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy: The VANISH Trial.室性心动过速消融与抗心律失常药物治疗升级的成本效果比较:VANISH 试验。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 May;4(5):660-668. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
10
Prognostic Value of Noninducibility on Outcomes of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: A VANISH Substudy.室性心动过速消融后无诱发性对预后的预测价值:VANISH 子研究。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Jul;4(7):911-919. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Catheter Ablation Versus Anti-arrhythmic Drugs for Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmia.导管消融术与抗心律失常药物治疗室性心律失常的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2024 Aug 24;16(8):e67649. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67649. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Acute post-procedural inducibility is a poor predictor of clinical outcomes in high-risk patients (PAINESD > 17) undergoing scar-related ventricular tachycardia ablation.在因瘢痕相关室性心动过速消融术而接受治疗的高危患者(PAINESD > 17)中,术后即刻诱导性是临床结局的一个较差预测指标。
Europace. 2024 Jul 2;26(7). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae185.
3
Management of patients with an electrical storm or clustered ventricular arrhythmias: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC-endorsed by the Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, Heart Rhythm Society, and Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society.管理电风暴或簇发性室性心律失常患者:欧洲心脏病学会心律协会的临床共识声明——由亚太心律学会、心律学会和拉丁美洲心律学会认可。
Europace. 2024 Mar 30;26(4). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae049.
4
Impact of ventricular tachycardia ablation in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator carriers: a multicentre, international analysis from the iSUSI project.室性心动过速消融对皮下植入式心脏转复除颤器携带者的影响:iSUSI 项目的多中心国际分析。
Europace. 2024 Mar 30;26(4). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae066.
5
Spotlight on the 2022 ESC guideline management of ventricular arrhythmias and prevention of sudden cardiac death: 10 novel key aspects.聚焦 2022 ESC 指南:室性心律失常的管理和心源性猝死的预防:10 个新的关键方面。
Europace. 2023 May 19;25(5). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad091.

本文引用的文献

1
Electrophysiology's Identity Crisis: What our Clinical Trials Do and Do Not Say About Us.电生理学的身份危机:我们的临床试验对自身的阐述与未阐述之处
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2020 Jun 3;9(1):15-19. doi: 10.15420/aer.2019.21.
2
2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Position Statement on the Management of Ventricular Tachycardia and Fibrillation in Patients With Structural Heart Disease.2020 年加拿大心血管学会/加拿大心律协会关于结构性心脏病患者室性心动过速和心室颤动管理的立场声明。
Can J Cardiol. 2020 Jun;36(6):822-836. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.04.004.
3
Clinical, procedural and long-term outcome of ischemic VT ablation in patients with previous anterior versus inferior myocardial infarction.既往前壁心肌梗死与下壁心肌梗死患者缺血性 VT 消融的临床、程序和长期结局。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Oct;109(10):1282-1291. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01622-z. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
4
2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.2019 年 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS 专家共识声明:导管消融治疗室性心律失常。
Europace. 2019 Aug 1;21(8):1143-1144. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz132.
5
Evaluating Flexible Modeling of Continuous Covariates in Inverse-Weighted Estimators.评估逆加权估计中连续协变量的灵活建模。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun 1;188(6):1181-1191. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz004.
6
2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.2017年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会室性心律失常患者管理和心脏性猝死预防指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组和心律学会的报告
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Oct;15(10):e73-e189. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.036. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
7
Impact of Substrate Modification by Catheter Ablation on Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Interventions in Patients With Unstable Ventricular Arrhythmias and Coronary Artery Disease: Results From the Multicenter Randomized Controlled SMS (Substrate Modification Study).导管消融进行基质改良对不稳定室性心律失常和冠状动脉疾病患者植入式心律转复除颤器干预的影响:多中心随机对照SMS(基质改良研究)结果
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Mar;10(3). doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004422.
8
Outcomes of ischaemic mitral regurgitation in anterior versus inferior ST elevation myocardial infarction.前壁与下壁ST段抬高型心肌梗死中缺血性二尖瓣反流的结局
Open Heart. 2016 Nov 10;3(2):e000493. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000493. eCollection 2016.
9
Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation versus Escalation of Antiarrhythmic Drugs.室性心动过速消融与抗心律失常药物升级。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 14;375(2):111-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513614. Epub 2016 May 5.
10
2015 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.2015年欧洲心脏病学会室性心律失常管理和心脏性猝死预防指南
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016 Feb;69(2):176. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.01.001.

心肌梗死后部位对室性心动过速消融与抗心律失常药物升级治疗效果的比较:VANISH 试验的一个亚研究。

Comparative effectiveness of ventricular tachycardia ablation vs. escalated antiarrhythmic drug therapy by location of myocardial infarction: a sub-study of the VANISH trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Department of Medicine, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Europace. 2022 Jul 15;24(6):948-958. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab298.

DOI:10.1093/europace/euab298
PMID:34964475
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9282915/
Abstract

AIMS

Complexity of the ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate and the size and thickness of infarction area border zones differ based on location of myocardial infarctions (MIs). These differences may translate into heterogeneity in the effectiveness of treatments. This study aims to examine the influence of infarct location on the effectiveness of VT ablation in comparison with escalated pharmacological therapy in patients with prior MI and antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)-refractory VT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

VANISH trial participants were categorized based on the presence or absence of an inferior MI scar. Inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox models were calculated for each subgroup. Of 259 randomized patients (median age 69.8 years, 7.0% women), 135 had an inferior MI and 124 had a non-inferior MI. Among patients with an inferior MI, no statistically significant difference in the composite primary outcome of all-cause mortality, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock, and VT storm was detected between treatment arms [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-1.20]. In contrast, patients with non-inferior MIs had a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of the primary outcome with ablation (aHR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27-0.86). In a sensitivity analysis of anterior MI patients (n = 83), a trend towards a reduction in the primary outcome with ablation was detected (aHR 0.50, 95% CI 0.23-1.09).

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of VT ablation versus escalated AADs varies based on the location of the MI. Patients with MI scars located only in non-inferior regions of the ventricles derive greater benefit from VT ablation in comparison to escalation of AADs in reducing VT-related events.

摘要

目的

根据心肌梗死(MI)的位置,室性心动过速(VT)基质的复杂性以及梗塞区域边界带的大小和厚度存在差异。这些差异可能会转化为治疗效果的异质性。本研究旨在检查梗塞部位对 VT 消融有效性的影响,并与先前 MI 和抗心律失常药物(AAD)难治性 VT 患者的升级药物治疗进行比较。

方法和结果

根据是否存在下壁 MI 瘢痕,将 VANISH 试验参与者进行分类。为每个亚组计算了逆概率治疗加权 Cox 模型。在 259 名随机患者(中位年龄 69.8 岁,7.0%为女性)中,135 例患有下壁 MI,124 例患有非下壁 MI。在下壁 MI 患者中,治疗组之间未发现全因死亡率,适当的植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)电击和 VT 风暴的复合主要结局有统计学上的显著差异[调整后的危险比(aHR)0.80,95%置信区间(CI)0.51-1.20]。相比之下,非下壁 MI 患者的消融术主要结局发生率明显降低(aHR 0.48,95%CI 0.27-0.86)。在前壁 MI 患者(n = 83)的敏感性分析中,检测到消融术降低主要结局的趋势(aHR 0.50,95%CI 0.23-1.09)。

结论

VT 消融与升级 AAD 的有效性取决于 MI 的位置。与升级 AAD 相比,仅在心室非下壁区域存在 MI 瘢痕的患者,通过 VT 消融在减少 VT 相关事件方面获得更大的益处。