Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Microsc Res Tech. 2022 May;85(5):1799-1807. doi: 10.1002/jemt.24040. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
Aim of this study was to determine the fracture strength and modes of endocrown and overlay restorations with/without fiber reinforcement on endodontically treated teeth. Sixty-five molar teeth were used: Group IN (intact teeth), Group E (endocrown), Group ER (endocrown + ribbond), Group O (overlay), Group OR (overlay + ribbond; n = 13). Ribbond (Seattle, WA) was inserted at the base of pulp chamber in Group ER and OR. All restorations were designed and produced by using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (Sirona Dental Systems, Bensheim, Germany) and Cerasmart (GC Corp. Kasugai, Aichi, Japan). All teeth were subjected to thermomechanical aging and fractured in a universal test device. Fractured surfaces were analyzed with a stereomicroscope (SMZ1000, Nikon, Japan). Data were analyzed with Welch's analysis of variance and Games-Howell test (p < .001). Group E showed significantly lower fracture strength values than other groups(p < .05). No statistically significant differences were found among the other groups(p > .05). Most of the unfavorable fractures were seen in Groups E and O. Overlay restorations showed higher fracture strength values than endocrown restorations. Although fiber insertion did not improve the fracture strength of the indirect restorations, it reduced the frequency of irreparable fracture mode. Overlay restorations and fiber application are more advantageous in preserving the durability of the endodontically treated teeth.
本研究旨在确定有/无纤维增强的牙髓治疗牙的嵌体冠和覆盖修复体的断裂强度和模式。使用了 65 颗磨牙:IN 组(完整牙)、E 组(嵌体冠)、ER 组(嵌体冠+Ribbond)、O 组(覆盖体)、OR 组(覆盖体+Ribbond;n=13)。在 ER 和 OR 组,将 Ribbond(西雅图,WA)插入牙髓腔底部。所有修复体均采用计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(西诺德牙科系统,本海姆,德国)和 Cerasmart(GC 株式会社,春日井,爱知,日本)设计和制作。所有牙齿均进行热机械老化,然后在万能试验机上断裂。用立体显微镜(SMZ1000,尼康,日本)分析断裂表面。使用 Welch 方差分析和 Games-Howell 检验(p<.001)分析数据。E 组的断裂强度值明显低于其他组(p<.05)。其他组之间无统计学差异(p>.05)。大多数不利的断裂发生在 E 组和 O 组。覆盖修复体的断裂强度值高于嵌体冠修复体。尽管纤维插入并未提高间接修复体的断裂强度,但降低了不可修复断裂模式的频率。覆盖修复体和纤维应用更有利于保护牙髓治疗牙的耐久性。