• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃腺癌的外科治疗:我们是否为患者实现了教科书式的肿瘤学治疗效果?

Surgical treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma: Are we achieving textbook oncologic outcomes for our patients?

作者信息

Spolverato Gaya, Paro Alessandro, Capelli Giulia, Dalmacy Djhenne, Poultsides George A, Fields Ryan C, Weber Sharon M, Votanopoulos Konstantinos I, He Jin, Maithel Shishir K, Pucciarelli Salvatore, Pawlik Timothy M

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastrointestinal Science, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Department of Surgery, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;125(4):621-630. doi: 10.1002/jso.26778. Epub 2021 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1002/jso.26778
PMID:34964983
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Composite measures are increasingly used to assess quality of care in surgical oncology. We sought to define the incidence of "textbook oncologic outcome" (TOO) following resection of gastric adenocarcinoma among a large, international cohort of patients.

METHODS

Gastric adenocarcinoma patients undergoing resection between 2000 and 2020 were identified from an international database. TOO was defined as margin-negative resection, examination of ≥16 lymph nodes, no prolonged length-of-stay (LOS), no 30-day mortality, and stage-appropriate receipt of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Among a total of 910 patients, 321 patients (35.3%) achieved a postoperative TOO. While failure to evaluate ≥16 lymph nodes (n = 591, 65.0%) and receipt of chemotherapy (n = 651, 71.5%) had the greatest negative impact on the ability to obtain a TOO, no 30-day mortality (n = 880, 96.7%), margin-negative resection (n = 831, 91.3%), and no extended LOS (n = 706, 77.6%) were more commonly achieved. No postoperative complications (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.31-0.63) and T1a/T1b-stage disease (OR: 2.87; 95% CI: 1.59-5.18) were independently associated with achieving a TOO (p < 0.05). The odds of achieving a TOO improved over time (p-trend < 0.05), which was largely attributable to improved odds of evaluating ≥16 lymph nodes (2010-2014 vs. 2000-2004: OR, 5.21; 95% CI: 3.22-8.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Only about one in three patients achieved a TOO following resection of gastric adenocarcinoma. Odds of TOO increased over time, largely due to improved lymph node evaluation.

摘要

背景与目的

综合指标越来越多地用于评估外科肿瘤学的医疗质量。我们试图在一个大型国际患者队列中确定胃腺癌切除术后“教科书式肿瘤学结局”(TOO)的发生率。

方法

从一个国际数据库中识别出2000年至2020年间接受胃腺癌切除术的患者。TOO定义为切缘阴性切除、检查≥16枚淋巴结、无住院时间延长(LOS)、无30天死亡率以及按分期适当接受化疗。

结果

在总共910例患者中,321例患者(35.3%)术后达到TOO。虽然未检查≥16枚淋巴结(n = 591,65.0%)和接受化疗(n = 651,71.5%)对获得TOO的能力有最大的负面影响,但无30天死亡率(n = 880,96.7%)、切缘阴性切除(n = 831,91.3%)和无住院时间延长(n = 706,77.6%)更为常见。无术后并发症(OR:0.44;95% CI:0.31 - 0.63)和T1a/T1b期疾病(OR:2.87;95% CI:1.59 - 5.18)与达到TOO独立相关(p < 0.05)。获得TOO的几率随时间提高(p趋势 < 0.05),这在很大程度上归因于检查≥16枚淋巴结几率的提高(2010 - 2014年与2000 - 2004年相比:OR,5.21;95% CI:3.22 - 8.45)。

结论

胃腺癌切除术后只有约三分之一的患者达到TOO。TOO的几率随时间增加,主要是由于淋巴结评估的改善。

相似文献

1
Surgical treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma: Are we achieving textbook oncologic outcomes for our patients?胃腺癌的外科治疗:我们是否为患者实现了教科书式的肿瘤学治疗效果?
J Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;125(4):621-630. doi: 10.1002/jso.26778. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
2
Oncologic and surgical outcomes for gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy differ by race in the United States.在美国,接受胃癌切除术的胃癌患者的肿瘤学和手术结果因种族而异。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;46(10 Pt A):1941-1947. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.05.014. Epub 2020 May 16.
3
Impact of Textbook Oncologic Outcome Attainment on Survival After Gastrectomy: A Review of the National Cancer Database.教科书式肿瘤学结局达成对胃切除术患者生存的影响:国家癌症数据库综述。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8239-8248. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12388-1. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
4
Adjuvant Therapy Improves Survival for T2N0 Gastric Cancer Patients with Sub-optimal Lymphadenectomy.辅助治疗可提高淋巴结清扫不充分的T2N0期胃癌患者的生存率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(6):1956-62. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5075-1. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
5
Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: the American experience.胃癌的微创手术:美国的经验。
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Mar;20(2):368-378. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0605-5. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
6
Prognostic impact of resection margin involvement after extended (D2/D3) gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a 15-year experience at a single institute.进展期胃癌扩大根治术(D2/D3)后切缘受累的预后影响:单中心15年经验
J Surg Oncol. 2007 May 1;95(6):461-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.20731.
7
Open vs robot-assisted laparoscopic gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma: a case-control study.开腹与机器人辅助腹腔镜胃切除术联合 D2 淋巴结清扫术治疗腺癌的病例对照研究。
Int J Med Robot. 2011 Dec;7(4):452-8. doi: 10.1002/rcs.416. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
8
Totally laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a matched retrospective cohort study.完全腹腔镜手术与开放胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌:一项配对回顾性队列研究
Hong Kong Med J. 2019 Feb;25(1):30-7. doi: 10.12809/hkmj177150. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
9
Utility of the proximal margin frozen section for resection of gastric adenocarcinoma: a 7-Institution Study of the US Gastric Cancer Collaborative.近端切缘冰冻切片在胃腺癌切除术中的应用:美国胃癌协作组的7机构研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec;21(13):4202-10. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3834-z. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
10
Gastrectomy case volume and textbook outcome: an analysis of the Population Registry of Esophageal and Stomach Tumours of Ontario (PRESTO).胃切除术病例量与教科书结果:安大略省食管和胃肿瘤人群登记处(PRESTO)分析。
Gastric Cancer. 2020 May;23(3):391-402. doi: 10.1007/s10120-019-01015-w. Epub 2019 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolution of Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Change Point Analysis of Textbook Outcome over Twenty Years.肝细胞癌肝切除术的演变:二十年间教科书结果的变化点分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 26;61(1):12. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010012.
2
How to measure quality of surgery as a component of multimodality treatment of gastric cancer.如何衡量作为胃癌多模式治疗组成部分的手术质量。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024 Jun 12;8(5):740-749. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12833. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Racial disparities in the attainment of textbook oncologic outcomes following colectomy for colon cancer: a national cancer database cohort study.
种族差异对结肠癌患者接受结肠癌根治术后获得肿瘤学治疗效果的影响:基于国家癌症数据库的队列研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Apr 27;409(1):140. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03330-y.
4
Textbook oncologic outcomes are associated with increased overall survival in patients with pancreatic head cancer after undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.教科书式的肿瘤学结果与接受腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术后的胰头癌患者总生存期延长相关。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb 6;22(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03322-8.
5
Evaluation of optimum classification measures used to define textbook outcome among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of gastric cancer.评估用于定义接受根治性胃切除术的胃癌患者的标准治疗结局的最佳分类测量方法。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):1199. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11695-4.
6
Challenge for the future: assessing the quality of abdominal surgery using composite quality measures.未来的挑战:使用综合质量指标评估腹部手术质量
BJS Open. 2023 Nov 1;7(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad116.
7
Textbook outcome in oncological gastric surgery: a systematic review and call for an international consensus.肿瘤胃外科的教科书结果:系统评价和国际共识呼吁。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep 12;21(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03166-8.
8
The value of analyzing textbook outcomes after laparoscopic hepatectomy-a narrative review.腹腔镜肝切除术后分析教科书结果的价值——一项叙述性综述
Transl Cancer Res. 2023 Mar 31;12(3):631-637. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-2122. Epub 2023 Feb 22.