Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2021 Sep;32(8):501-509. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731698. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
There are many counseling and sound therapy approaches to treat tinnitus. Counseling approaches range from providing information using directive or collaborative approaches. Sound therapies include strategies that use background sounds to totally or partially mask tinnitus to reduce the prominence of or decrease the loudness or annoyance of the tinnitus.
We evaluated the effectiveness of tinnitus activities treatment (TAT) in two groups, those without hearing aids (HA) and those who were provided with HA. In both groups, comparisons were made among those receiving (1) counseling only, (2) counseling and partial masking, and (3) counseling and total masking.
Participants were provided with HA or not, based on their choice, and then randomly assigned to one of the three groups. The Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ) was used as the primary measure.
For those without HA, significant benefits were obtained for 8 out of 22 participants in the counseling group, 8 of 13 in the total masking group, and 8 of 24 in the partial mask group. The average decrease in the THQ was 15% for the counseling group, 25% for the total mask, and 14% for the partial masking group. For those with HA; significant benefits were obtained for 5 of 16 in the counseling group, 3 of 14 in the total mask group, and 6 of 13 in the partial mask group. The average decrease in the THQ score was 12% for counseling, 13% for total masking, and 16% for partial masking. No significant differences among groups were observed.
Individual differences were large. Many benefited from their treatment, but some did not. We believe this was likely influenced by their expectations.
有许多咨询和声音疗法方法可用于治疗耳鸣。咨询方法包括使用指导或协作方法提供信息。声音疗法包括使用背景声音完全或部分掩蔽耳鸣以降低耳鸣的突出度或减小其响度或烦扰度的策略。
我们评估了耳鸣活动治疗(TAT)在两组中的效果,一组是没有助听器(HA)的,另一组是提供了 HA 的。在两组中,对接受以下三种治疗的患者进行了比较:(1)仅咨询,(2)咨询和部分掩蔽,以及(3)咨询和完全掩蔽。
根据患者的选择为其提供 HA 或不提供 HA,然后将他们随机分配到三个组中的一个。使用耳鸣残疾问卷(THQ)作为主要测量指标。
对于没有 HA 的患者,在咨询组中有 22 名患者中的 8 名,在完全掩蔽组中有 13 名患者中的 8 名,在部分掩蔽组中有 24 名患者中的 8 名,获得了显著的收益。咨询组的 THQ 平均降低了 15%,完全掩蔽组为 25%,部分掩蔽组为 14%。对于有 HA 的患者,在咨询组中有 16 名患者中的 5 名,在完全掩蔽组中有 14 名患者中的 3 名,在部分掩蔽组中有 13 名患者中的 6 名,获得了显著的收益。咨询组的 THQ 平均降低了 12%,完全掩蔽组为 13%,部分掩蔽组为 16%。组间无显著差异。
个体差异很大。许多人从他们的治疗中受益,但有些人没有。我们认为这可能受到他们的期望的影响。