Suppr超能文献

通过助听器传递的声学刺激对耳鸣的影响。

Effects of acoustical stimuli delivered through hearing aids on tinnitus.

作者信息

Sweetow Robert W, Sabes Jennifer Henderson

机构信息

University of California, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Jul-Aug;21(7):461-73. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.7.5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of acoustic signals to mask, mix with, or ease the distress associated with tinnitus has been clinically employed for decades. It has been proposed that expanding acoustic options for tinnitus sufferers due to personal preferences is desirable. Fractal tones incorporate many useful characteristics of music while avoiding certain features that could be distracting to some individuals.

PURPOSE

To assess the effects on relaxation, tinnitus annoyance, tinnitus handicap, and tinnitus reaction from the use of a hearing aid that incorporates combinations of amplification, fractal tones, and white noise.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Participants listened to experimental hearing aids containing several acoustic options and were asked to rate the signals in terms of their effect on relaxation and tinnitus annoyance. They subsequently wore the hearing aids for 6 mo and completed tinnitus handicap and reaction scales.

STUDY SAMPLE

Fourteen hearing-impaired adults with primary complaints of subjective tinnitus.

INTERVENTION

Participants were tested wearing hearing aids containing several programs including amplification only, fractal tones only, and a combination of amplification, noise, and/or fractal tones. The fractal tones (now commercially available as the "Zen" feature) were generated by the Widex Mind hearing aid. Rating procedures were conducted in the laboratory, and tinnitus reaction and handicap were assessed during and following a 6 mo field trial.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were collected at the initial visit, one week, 1 mo, 3 mo, and 6 mo. Nonparametric statistics included Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank, chi(2), and repeated-measures analyses of variance.

RESULTS

Thirteen of 14 participants reported that their tinnitus annoyance, as measured by the Tinnitus Annoyance Scale, was reduced for at least one of the amplified conditions (with or without fractal tones or noise), relative to the unaided condition. Nine assigned a lower tinnitus annoyance rating when listening to fractal tones alone versus the amplification-alone condition. There was a range of preferences observed for fractal settings, with most participants preferring fractals with a slow or medium tempo and restricted dynamic range. The majority (86%) indicated that it was easier to relax while listening to fractal signals. Participants had preferences for certain programs and fractal characteristics. Although seven participants rated the noise-only condition as providing the least tinnitus annoyance, only two opted to have noise only as a program during the field trial, and none selected the noise-only condition as the preferred setting. Furthermore, while all four of the experienced hearing aid users selected noise as producing the least annoying tinnitus in the laboratory, only one selected it for field wear. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire scores were improved over the course of the 6 mo trial, with clinically significant improvements occurring for over half of the participants on at least one of the measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that use of acoustic stimuli, particularly fractal tones, delivered though hearing aids can provide amplification while allowing for relief for some tinnitus sufferers. It is important to recognize, however, that tinnitus management procedures need to be supplemented with appropriate counseling.

摘要

背景

使用声学信号来掩盖、混合或减轻与耳鸣相关的困扰在临床上已应用了数十年。有人提出,根据个人喜好为耳鸣患者扩展声学选择是可取的。分形音调融合了音乐的许多有用特性,同时避免了可能会分散一些人注意力的某些特征。

目的

评估使用结合了放大、分形音调和白噪声的助听器对放松、耳鸣烦恼、耳鸣障碍和耳鸣反应的影响。

研究设计

参与者聆听包含多种声学选择的实验性助听器,并被要求根据其对放松和耳鸣烦恼的影响对信号进行评分。随后,他们佩戴这些助听器6个月,并完成耳鸣障碍和反应量表。

研究样本

14名主要抱怨主观耳鸣的听力受损成年人。

干预措施

参与者佩戴包含多个程序的助听器进行测试,这些程序包括仅放大、仅分形音调,以及放大、噪声和/或分形音调的组合。分形音调(现在作为“禅”功能在市场上有售)由Widex Mind助听器生成。评分程序在实验室进行,耳鸣反应和障碍在6个月的现场试验期间及之后进行评估。

数据收集与分析

在初次就诊、1周、1个月、3个月和6个月时收集数据。非参数统计包括Wilcoxon配对符号秩检验、卡方检验和重复测量方差分析。

结果

14名参与者中有13人报告称,与未佩戴助听器的情况相比,在至少一种放大条件下(有或没有分形音调和噪声),他们通过耳鸣烦恼量表测量的耳鸣烦恼有所减轻。9人在单独聆听分形音调时比仅放大条件下给出了更低的耳鸣烦恼评分。观察到对于分形设置有一系列偏好,大多数参与者更喜欢节奏缓慢或适中且动态范围受限的分形音调。大多数人(86%)表示在聆听分形信号时更容易放松。参与者对某些程序和分形特征有偏好。尽管7名参与者将仅噪声条件评为耳鸣烦恼最小,但在现场试验期间只有2人选择将仅噪声作为一个程序,没有人选择仅噪声条件作为首选设置。此外,虽然4名有经验的助听器使用者在实验室中都选择噪声作为产生最不烦人的耳鸣的选项,但只有1人选择在现场佩戴时使用。在6个月的试验过程中,耳鸣障碍量表和耳鸣反应问卷的得分有所改善,超过一半的参与者在至少一项测量中出现了具有临床意义的改善。

结论

结果表明,通过助听器传递的声学刺激,特别是分形音调,在提供放大功能的同时,可以为一些耳鸣患者带来缓解。然而,重要的是要认识到,耳鸣管理程序需要辅以适当的咨询。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验