Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Programa Nacional Producción de Carne y Lana, Ruta 5 Km 386, Tacuarembó, 45000, Uruguay.
Private Diagnostic Laboratory, Tacuarembo, Uruguay.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2021 Dec 30;54(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s11250-021-03039-w.
The sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of three diagnostic tests for the detection of Campylobacter fetus venerealis (Cfv) using field samples were estimated using a Bayesian latent class model (BLCM), accounting for the absence of a gold standard. The tests included in this study were direct immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and real-time PCR (RT-PCR). Twelve farms from two different populations were selected and bull prepuce samples were collected. The IFAT was performed according to the OIE Manual. The conventional PCR was performed as multiplex, targeting the gene nahE for C. fetus species identification and insertion element ISCfe1 for Cfv identification. The RT-PCR was performed as uniplex: one targeting the gene nahE for C. fetus and the other targeting the insertion ISCfe1 (ISC2) for Cfv. Results from the BLCM showed a median Se of 11.7% (Bayesian credibility interval (BCI): 1.93-29.79%), 53.7% (BCI: 23.1-95.0%), and 36.1% (BCI: 14.5-71.7%) for IFAT, PCR, and RT-PCR respectively. The Sp were 94.5% (BCI: 90.1-97.9%), 97.0% (BCI: 92.9-99.3%), and 98.4% (BCI: 95.3-99.7%) for IFAT, PCR, and RT-PCR respectively. The correlation between PCR and RT-PCR was positive and low in samples from both sampled population (0.63% vs 8.47%). These results suggest that diagnostic sensitivity of the studied tests is lower using field samples than using pure Cfv strains.
使用贝叶斯潜在类别模型 (BLCM) 估计了三种用于检测弯曲杆菌胎儿维纳斯 (Cfv) 的诊断测试在现场样本中的灵敏度 (Se) 和特异性 (Sp),因为不存在金标准。本研究中包括的测试是直接免疫荧光抗体测试 (IFAT)、聚合酶链反应 (PCR) 和实时 PCR (RT-PCR)。从两个不同群体中选择了 12 个农场,收集了公牛包皮样本。IFAT 是按照 OIE 手册进行的。常规 PCR 作为多重 PCR 进行,针对 C. fetus 种鉴定基因 nahE 和 Cfv 鉴定插入元件 ISCfe1。RT-PCR 作为单重 PCR 进行:一种针对 C. fetus 的基因 nahE,另一种针对 Cfv 的插入 ISCfe1(ISC2)。BLCM 的结果显示,IFAT、PCR 和 RT-PCR 的中位数 Se 分别为 11.7%(贝叶斯可信度区间 (BCI):1.93-29.79%)、53.7%(BCI:23.1-95.0%)和 36.1%(BCI:14.5-71.7%)。IFAT、PCR 和 RT-PCR 的 Sp 分别为 94.5%(BCI:90.1-97.9%)、97.0%(BCI:92.9-99.3%)和 98.4%(BCI:95.3-99.7%)。来自两个采样群体的样本中,PCR 和 RT-PCR 之间的相关性为阳性且较低 (0.63%vs8.47%)。这些结果表明,与使用纯 Cfv 株相比,现场样本中研究测试的诊断灵敏度较低。