School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Department of Dermatology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2022 Sep;38(5):409-417. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12766. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
Vitiligo may be treated with hospital-based phototherapy, but this requires long-term frequent appointments. Self-treatment using home-based phototherapy is a convenient alternative, which may improve adherence and results, but evidence is limited, and so it is not routinely recommended. This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of home-based phototherapy for vitiligo.
Searches were conducted on Medline, Scopus and The Cochrane Library for randomised controlled trials comparing home-based phototherapy with institution-based phototherapy or placebo/no phototherapy for vitiligo. The primary outcome was treatment effectiveness. CASP criteria were used for quality assessment. Data were synthesised in a meta-analysis where appropriate.
Three studies (195 participants) were included: two compared home-based with institution-based phototherapy, and one compared home-based phototherapy with placebo. Studies were of mixed quality. Therapy regimes varied across studies. Findings on effectiveness were contradictory across studies with variable rates of repigmentation. There was no significant difference in repigmentation rates between the groups, although adherence to treatment schedules was significantly better in home-based groups. Adverse effects were significantly higher in home-based groups. No long-term data were reported on maintenance of treatment benefits.
Although adherence to treatment was significantly better with home-based phototherapy, data were insufficient to form conclusions on effectiveness. Home-based phototherapy had a significantly higher risk of adverse effects, making it difficult to recommend in clinical practice. However, as it offers logistical advantages for patients, its effectiveness alongside additional safety measures should be explored further in large-scale, good-quality RCTs, with standardised outcome measures, including patient-reported outcomes.
白癜风可以通过医院为基础的光疗来治疗,但这需要长期频繁的预约。使用家庭为基础的光疗进行自我治疗是一种方便的替代方法,它可能提高治疗的依从性和效果,但证据有限,因此不常规推荐。本系统评价旨在评估家庭为基础的光疗治疗白癜风的有效性和安全性。
在 Medline、Scopus 和 The Cochrane Library 上进行了检索,以比较家庭为基础的光疗与机构为基础的光疗或安慰剂/无光疗治疗白癜风的随机对照试验。主要结局是治疗效果。使用 CASP 标准进行质量评估。在适当的情况下,对数据进行了荟萃分析。
纳入了三项研究(195 名参与者):两项研究比较了家庭为基础与机构为基础的光疗,一项研究比较了家庭为基础的光疗与安慰剂。研究质量参差不齐。研究间的治疗方案存在差异。有效性的研究结果存在矛盾,复色率各不相同。两组间的复色率没有显著差异,尽管家庭组的治疗方案依从性显著更好。家庭组的不良反应发生率显著更高。没有报告关于维持治疗效果的长期数据。
尽管家庭为基础的光疗治疗的依从性显著更好,但数据不足以得出有效性的结论。家庭为基础的光疗有更高的不良反应风险,因此在临床实践中难以推荐。然而,由于它为患者提供了便利的优势,应该在大规模、高质量的 RCT 中进一步探索其有效性,同时考虑到额外的安全措施,并采用标准化的结局指标,包括患者报告的结局。