Femoral Lengthening in Children-A Comparison Between Magnetic Intramedullary Lengthening Nails and External Fixators.

BACKGROUND

Femoral lengthening can be achieved using external fixators or intramedullary lengthening nails. The purpose of this research was to compare the outcome of femoral lengthening in children using PRECICE magnetic lengthening nails with lengthening external fixators.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 50 children who had femoral lengthening. Group A included patients who had lengthening with external fixation, patients in Group B had lengthening with PRECICE intramedullary lengthening nails. Each group included 25 patients. The sample strictly included children aged between 11 and 17 years. Patients in each group were matched according to age and indication for lengthening whether congenital or acquired conditions. The outcomes focused on the ability to achieve target length, healing index, residual malalignment, length of hospitalization following the osteotomy surgery, and encountered complications.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 14.7 years for each group. The length gain was 42±12 mm for Group A and 41.6±8 mm for Group B (P=0.84). Lengthening nails achieved the target length more accurately compared with external fixation (P=0.017). The healing index was significantly higher in group A with 53.2±19 days/cm compared with 40.2±14 days/cm in group B (P=0.03). Group A had significantly higher complications than group B (P<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the final coronal malalignment between the 2 groups (P=0.2). The mean length of stay was 9.2±5.8 days for group A and 4.2±3.3 days for group B (P=0.0005).

CONCLUSION

Magnetic lengthening nails are clinically effective for femoral lengthening in the pediatric population. Compared with external fixation, healing index and complications were more favorable with PRECICE nails. Further research is required to study the cost-effectiveness of this technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-case series.