Division of Trauma & Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, AL, USA.
Am Surg. 2022 Mar;88(3):380-383. doi: 10.1177/00031348211058627. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
Treatment of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) is controversial. Hyperosmolar therapy is used to prevent cerebral edema in these patients. Many intensivists measure direct correlates of these agents-serum sodium and osmolality. We seek to provide context on the utility of using these measures to estimate ICP in TBI patients.
Patients admitted with TBI who required ICP monitoring from 2008 to 2012 were included. Intracranial pressure, serum sodium, and serum osmolality were assessed prior to hyperosmotic therapy then at 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, and 72 hours after admission. A linear regression was performed on sodium, osmolality, and ICP at baseline and serum sodium and osmolality that corresponded with ICP for 6-72-hour time points.
136 patients were identified. Patients with initial measures were included in the baseline analysis (n = 29). Patients who underwent a craniectomy were excluded from the 6-72-hour analysis (n = 53). Initial ICP and serum sodium were not significantly correlated (R2 .00367, = .696). Initial ICP and serum osmolality were not significantly correlated (R2 .00734, = .665). Intracranial pressure and serum sodium 6-72 hours after presentation were poorly correlated (R2 .104, < .0001), as were ICP and serum osmolality at 6-72 hours after presentation (R2 .116, < .0001).
Our results indicate initial ICP is not correlated with serum sodium or osmolality suggesting these are not useful initial clinical markers for ICP estimation. The association between ICP and serum sodium and osmolality after hyperosmolar therapy was poor, thus may not be useful as surrogates for direct ICP measurements.
颅脑创伤(TBI)患者颅内压(ICP)升高的治疗存在争议。高渗疗法用于预防此类患者的脑水肿。许多重症监护医生会测量这些药物的直接相关指标——血清钠和渗透压。我们旨在为使用这些指标来估计 TBI 患者 ICP 的实用性提供依据。
纳入了 2008 年至 2012 年期间因 TBI 入院并需要 ICP 监测的患者。在开始高渗治疗前、入院后 6、12、18、24、48 和 72 小时评估 ICP、血清钠和血清渗透压。对基础值时的钠、渗透压和 ICP 以及对应 6-72 小时时间点的血清钠和渗透压进行线性回归。
共确定了 136 名患者。纳入了初始测量值的患者(n = 29)进行基线分析。行去骨瓣减压术的患者被排除在 6-72 小时分析之外(n = 53)。初始 ICP 与血清钠无显著相关性(R2.00367, =.696)。初始 ICP 与血清渗透压无显著相关性(R2.00734, =.665)。入院后 6-72 小时 ICP 与血清钠的相关性较差(R2.104, <.0001),入院后 6-72 小时 ICP 与血清渗透压的相关性也较差(R2.116, <.0001)。
我们的结果表明,初始 ICP 与血清钠或渗透压无关,提示这些指标不能作为初始估计 ICP 的有用临床标志物。高渗治疗后 ICP 与血清钠和渗透压之间的相关性较差,因此可能不适用于直接 ICP 测量的替代指标。