• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 ASSIGN 开源确定性地址匹配算法,以向全科医生记录的患者地址分配唯一的属性参考编号。

Evaluation of the ASSIGN open-source deterministic address-matching algorithm for allocating unique property reference numbers to general practitioner-recorded patient addresses.

机构信息

Clinical Effectiveness Group, Centre for Primary Care, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London.

Endeavour Health Charity.

出版信息

Int J Popul Data Sci. 2021 Dec 8;6(1):1674. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1674. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1674
PMID:34970633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8678979/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Linking places to people is a core element of the UK government's geospatial strategy. Matching patient addresses in electronic health records to their Unique Property Reference Numbers (UPRNs) enables spatial linkage for research, innovation and public benefit. Available algorithms are not transparent or evaluated for use with addresses recorded by health care providers.

OBJECTIVES

To describe and quality assure the open-source deterministic ASSIGN address-matching algorithm applied to general practitioner-recorded patient addresses.

METHODS

Best practice standards were used to report the ASSIGN algorithm match rate, sensitivity and positive predictive value using gold-standard datasets from London and Wales. We applied the ASSIGN algorithm to the recorded addresses of a sample of 1,757,018 patients registered with all general practices in north east London. We examined bias in match results for the study population using multivariable analyses to estimate the likelihood of an address-matched UPRN by demographic, registration, and organisational variables.

RESULTS

We found a 99.5% and 99.6% match rate with high sensitivity (0.999,0.998) and positive predictive value (0.996,0.998) for the Welsh and London gold standard datasets respectively, and a 98.6% match rate for the study population.The 1.4% of the study population without a UPRN match were more likely to have changed registered address in the last 12 months (match rate: 95.4%), be from a Chinese ethnic background (95.5%), or registered with a general practice using the SystmOne clinical record system (94.4%). Conversely, people registered for more than 6.5 years with their general practitioner were more likely to have a match (99.4%) than those with shorter registration durations.

CONCLUSIONS

ASSIGN is a highly accurate open-source address-matching algorithm with a high match rate and minimal biases when evaluated against a large sample of general practice-recorded patient addresses. ASSIGN has potential to be used in other address-based datasets including those with information relevant to the wider determinants of health.

摘要

简介

将地点与人员联系起来是英国政府地理空间战略的核心要素。将电子健康记录中的患者地址与他们的独特属性参考编号 (UPRN) 相匹配,可为研究、创新和公共利益提供空间联系。现有的算法对于医疗保健提供者记录的地址不透明或评估其使用情况。

目的

描述并保证应用于一般实践记录的患者地址的开源确定性 ASSIGN 地址匹配算法的质量。

方法

使用最佳实践标准报告 ASSIGN 算法的匹配率、敏感性和阳性预测值,使用来自伦敦和威尔士的黄金标准数据集。我们将 ASSIGN 算法应用于注册在伦敦东北部所有全科医生的 1,757,018 名患者的记录地址。我们使用多变量分析来检查研究人群的匹配结果中的偏差,以估计根据人口统计学、注册和组织变量,地址匹配 UPRN 的可能性。

结果

我们发现威尔士和伦敦黄金标准数据集的匹配率分别为 99.5%和 99.6%,具有高敏感性(0.999,0.998)和阳性预测值(0.996,0.998),而研究人群的匹配率为 98.6%。在研究人群中,1.4%的患者没有 UPRN 匹配,他们更有可能在过去 12 个月内更改了注册地址(匹配率:95.4%),来自中国少数民族背景(95.5%),或注册使用 SystmOne 临床记录系统的全科医生(94.4%)。相反,与注册时间较短的人相比,在他们的全科医生那里注册超过 6.5 年的人更有可能匹配(99.4%)。

结论

ASSIGN 是一种高度准确的开源地址匹配算法,在评估大量一般实践记录的患者地址时,具有高匹配率和最小的偏差。ASSIGN 有可能用于其他基于地址的数据集,包括与健康的更广泛决定因素相关的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8676/8678979/03bb920fc799/ijpds-06-1674-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8676/8678979/03bb920fc799/ijpds-06-1674-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8676/8678979/03bb920fc799/ijpds-06-1674-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the ASSIGN open-source deterministic address-matching algorithm for allocating unique property reference numbers to general practitioner-recorded patient addresses.评估 ASSIGN 开源确定性地址匹配算法,以向全科医生记录的患者地址分配唯一的属性参考编号。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2021 Dec 8;6(1):1674. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1674. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparing Methods for Record Linkage for Public Health Action: Matching Algorithm Validation Study.比较公共卫生行动记录链接的方法:匹配算法验证研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Apr 30;6(2):e15917. doi: 10.2196/15917.
3
: a framework for linking free-text addresses to the Ordnance Survey Unique Property Reference Number database.一个将自由文本地址链接到 Ordnance Survey 唯一房产参考编号数据库的框架。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Nov 28;5:1186208. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1186208. eCollection 2023.
4
Improving our understanding of the social determinants of mental health: a data linkage study of mental health records and the 2011 UK census.提高我们对心理健康社会决定因素的理解:一项心理健康记录与 2011 年英国人口普查数据链接研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 29;14(1):e073582. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073582.
5
Data linkage errors in hospital administrative data when applying a pseudonymisation algorithm to paediatric intensive care records.将假名化算法应用于儿科重症监护记录时医院管理数据中的数据链接错误。
BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 21;5(8):e008118. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008118.
6
Empirical aspects of record linkage across multiple data sets using statistical linkage keys: the experience of the PIAC cohort study.使用统计链接键在多个数据集之间进行记录链接的经验方面:PIAC 队列研究的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Feb 18;10:41. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-41.
7
Accuracy of Probabilistic Linkage Using the Enhanced Matching System for Public Health and Epidemiological Studies.使用公共卫生与流行病学研究增强匹配系统的概率性链接的准确性
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 24;10(8):e0136179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136179. eCollection 2015.
8
A benchmark comparison of deterministic and probabilistic methods for defining manual review datasets in duplicate records reconciliation.在重复记录核对中定义人工审核数据集的确定性方法和概率性方法的基准比较。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):97-104. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001744. Epub 2013 May 23.
9
Linking mothers and infants within electronic health records: a comparison of deterministic and probabilistic algorithms.在电子健康记录中关联母婴:确定性算法与概率性算法的比较
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Jan;24(1):45-51. doi: 10.1002/pds.3728. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
10
Optimizing Patient Record Linkage in a Master Patient Index Using Machine Learning: Algorithm Development and Validation.利用机器学习优化主患者索引中的患者记录链接:算法开发与验证
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jun 29;7:e44331. doi: 10.2196/44331.

引用本文的文献

1
Household determinants of delayed MMR vaccination: longitudinal analysis using electronic health records in North East London, UK.MMR疫苗接种延迟的家庭影响因素:利用英国伦敦东北部电子健康记录进行的纵向分析
BMJ Open. 2025 May 2;15(5):e097559. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097559.
2
Inequalities in overcrowding in households with children in an ethnically diverse urban population: a cross-sectional study using linked health and housing records.种族多样化城市人口中有子女家庭的居住拥挤不平等现象:一项利用健康与住房记录联动进行的横断面研究。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2025 Jan 23;10(2):2408. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v10i2.2408. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Household factors and the risk of severe COVID-like illness early in the U.S. pandemic.美国家庭因素与新冠样疾病严重程度早期风险。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 21;17(7):e0271786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271786. eCollection 2022.
2
Association between living with children and outcomes from covid-19: OpenSAFELY cohort study of 12 million adults in England.与儿童同住与新冠病毒感染结局的关联:英格兰 1200 万成年人的 OpenSAFELY 队列研究。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 18;372:n628. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n628.
3
Covid-19: breaking the chain of household transmission.
Determining households from patient addresses and unique property reference numbers in general practitioner electronic health records.
通过全科医生电子健康记录中的患者地址和唯一房产参考编号来确定家庭。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2024 Apr 9;9(1):2379. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v9i1.2379. eCollection 2024.
4
Care home resident identification: A comparison of address matching methods with Natural Language Processing.养老院居民身份识别:地址匹配方法与自然语言处理的比较
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0309341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309341. eCollection 2024.
5
Creating a learning health system to include environmental determinants of health: The GroundsWell experience.创建一个纳入健康环境决定因素的学习型健康系统:GroundsWell项目经验。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Oct 10;8(4):e10461. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10461. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Is obesity more likely among children sharing a household with an older child with obesity? Cross-sectional study of linked National Child Measurement Programme data and electronic health records.肥胖儿童与家中有肥胖兄弟姐妹的儿童相比,更有可能肥胖吗?对国家儿童测量计划数据和电子健康记录进行的横断面研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Apr 10;8(1):e002533. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002533.
7
: a framework for linking free-text addresses to the Ordnance Survey Unique Property Reference Number database.一个将自由文本地址链接到 Ordnance Survey 唯一房产参考编号数据库的框架。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Nov 28;5:1186208. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1186208. eCollection 2023.
新冠疫情:阻断家庭传播链
BMJ. 2020 Aug 14;370:m3181. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3181.
4
Geocoding Error, Spatial Uncertainty, and Implications for Exposure Assessment and Environmental Epidemiology.地理编码错误、空间不确定性及其对暴露评估和环境流行病学的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;17(16):5845. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165845.
5
Using electronic health record data for environmental and place based population health research: a systematic review.利用电子健康记录数据开展环境和场所相关的人群健康研究:系统评价。
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Jul;28(7):493-502. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
6
GUILD: GUidance for Information about Linking Data sets.GUILD:数据集链接信息指南。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Mar 1;40(1):191-198. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx037.
7
Use of Electronic Health Records and Geographic Information Systems in Public Health Surveillance of Type 2 Diabetes: A Feasibility Study.电子健康记录和地理信息系统在 2 型糖尿病公共卫生监测中的应用:一项可行性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016 Mar 17;2(1):e12. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.4319. eCollection 2016 Jan-Jun.
8
"Community vital signs": incorporating geocoded social determinants into electronic records to promote patient and population health.“社区生命体征”:将地理编码的社会决定因素纳入电子记录以促进患者和人群健康。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar;23(2):407-12. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv088. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
9
Research into practice: understanding ethnic differences in healthcare usage and outcomes in general practice.研究转化为实践:了解全科医疗中医疗服务使用和结果方面的种族差异。
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Dec;64(629):653-5. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X683053.
10
A transparent and transportable methodology for evaluating Data Linkage software.一种用于评估数据链接软件的透明且可移植的方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2012 Feb;45(1):165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.10.006. Epub 2011 Oct 30.