• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病血糖控制改善途径中的退伍军人事务部(VA)和非退伍军人事务部医疗中心参与者之间并发症、心血管风险因素和糖尿病管理的差异:一项比较效果研究(GRADE)。

Differences in complications, cardiovascular risk factor, and diabetes management among participants enrolled at veterans affairs (VA) and non-VA medical centers in the glycemia reduction approaches in diabetes: A comparative effectiveness study (GRADE).

机构信息

Medical University of South Carolina and Department of Veterans Affairs, Charleston, SC, United States.

The Biostatistics Center, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Rockville, MD, United States.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022 Feb;184:109188. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109188. Epub 2021 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109188
PMID:34971663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8917078/
Abstract

AIMS

We evaluated differences in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) enrolled in the GRADE study at VA vs non-VA sites, focusing on cardiovascular risk factors and rates of diabetes care target achievements.

METHODS

We compared baseline characteristics between participants at VA (n = 1216) and non-VA (n = 3831) sites, stratifying analyses by cardiovascular disease (CVD) history.

RESULTS

VA and non-VA participants had similar diabetes duration (4.0 years), HbA1c (7.5%), and BMI (34 kg/m); however, VA participants had more individuals ≥ 65 years (37.3% vs 19.8%, p < 0.001), men (90.0% vs 55.2%, p < 0.001), hypertension (75.8% vs 63.6%, p < 0.001), hyperlipidemia (76.6% vs 64.6%, p < 0.001), current smokers (19.0% vs 12.1%, p < 0.001), nephropathy (20.4% vs 17.0%, p < 0.05), albuminuria (18.4% vs 15.1%, p < 0.05), and CVD (10.4% vs 5.2%, p < 0.001). In those without CVD, more VA participants were treated with lipid (70.8% vs 59.5%, p < 0.001) and blood pressure (74.9% vs 65.4%, p < 0.001) lowering medications, and had LDL-C < 70 mg/dl (32.9% vs 24.2%, p < 0.05). Among those with CVD, more VA participants had BP < 140/90 (80.2% vs 70.1%, p < 0.05) after adjusting for demographics.

CONCLUSION

GRADE participants at VA sites had more T2DM complications, greater CVD risk and were more likely to be treated with medications to reduce it, leading to more LDL-C at goal than non-VA participants, highlighting differences in diabetes populations and care.

摘要

目的

我们评估了在 VA 和非 VA 地点参加 GRADE 研究的 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者之间的差异,重点关注心血管危险因素和糖尿病治疗目标的达标率。

方法

我们比较了 VA(n=1216)和非 VA(n=3831)地点参与者的基线特征,按心血管疾病(CVD)病史进行分层分析。

结果

VA 和非 VA 参与者的糖尿病病程(4.0 年)、HbA1c(7.5%)和 BMI(34kg/m²)相似;然而,VA 参与者中有更多年龄≥65 岁的个体(37.3%比 19.8%,p<0.001)、男性(90.0%比 55.2%,p<0.001)、高血压(75.8%比 63.6%,p<0.001)、高血脂(76.6%比 64.6%,p<0.001)、当前吸烟者(19.0%比 12.1%,p<0.001)、肾病(20.4%比 17.0%,p<0.05)、白蛋白尿(18.4%比 15.1%,p<0.05)和 CVD(10.4%比 5.2%,p<0.001)。在没有 CVD 的患者中,更多的 VA 参与者接受了降脂(70.8%比 59.5%,p<0.001)和降压(74.9%比 65.4%,p<0.001)药物治疗,且 LDL-C<70mg/dl(32.9%比 24.2%,p<0.05)。在 CVD 患者中,调整人口统计学因素后,更多的 VA 参与者的血压<140/90(80.2%比 70.1%,p<0.05)。

结论

VA 地点的 GRADE 参与者有更多的 T2DM 并发症、更高的 CVD 风险,并且更有可能接受降低 CVD 风险的药物治疗,导致 LDL-C 达标率高于非 VA 参与者,突出了糖尿病患者群体和护理的差异。

相似文献

1
Differences in complications, cardiovascular risk factor, and diabetes management among participants enrolled at veterans affairs (VA) and non-VA medical centers in the glycemia reduction approaches in diabetes: A comparative effectiveness study (GRADE).糖尿病血糖控制改善途径中的退伍军人事务部(VA)和非退伍军人事务部医疗中心参与者之间并发症、心血管风险因素和糖尿病管理的差异:一项比较效果研究(GRADE)。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022 Feb;184:109188. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109188. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
2
Cardiometabolic Risk Factors and Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events in Women vs Men With Type 1 Diabetes.1 型糖尿病女性与男性的心血管代谢危险因素与心血管疾病事件发生情况比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2230710. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.30710.
3
Increased cardiovascular disease, resource use, and costs before the clinical diagnosis of diabetes in veterans in the southeastern U.S.美国东南部退伍军人在糖尿病临床诊断之前心血管疾病增加、资源使用及成本上升
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jun;30(6):749-57. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3075-7. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
4
Cardiovascular risk factor control among veterans with diabetes: the ambulatory care quality improvement project.糖尿病退伍军人的心血管危险因素控制:门诊护理质量改进项目。
Diabetes Care. 2004 May;27 Suppl 2:B33-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.suppl_2.b33.
5
Diabetes Prevention Program Translation in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局的糖尿病预防计划翻译
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jul;53(1):70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.009. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
6
Association Between a Temporary Reduction in Access to Health Care and Long-term Changes in Hypertension Control Among Veterans After a Natural Disaster.自然灾害后,退伍军人获得医疗保健机会暂时减少与高血压控制的长期变化之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1915111. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15111.
7
Type 1 diabetes management: Room for improvement.1 型糖尿病管理:仍有改进空间。
J Diabetes. 2023 Mar;15(3):255-263. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13368. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
8
Long-term effects of a lifestyle intervention on weight and cardiovascular risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: four-year results of the Look AHEAD trial.生活方式干预对2型糖尿病患者体重及心血管危险因素的长期影响:Look AHEAD试验的四年结果
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Sep 27;170(17):1566-75. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.334.
9
Heart matters: Gender and racial differences cardiovascular disease risk factor control among veterans.心脏问题:退伍军人中性别和种族在心血管疾病危险因素控制方面的差异
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Sep-Oct;24(5):477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.05.005.
10
Pharmacist-led shared medical appointments for multiple cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes.药师主导的共同医疗预约以降低 2 型糖尿病患者的多种心血管风险
Diabetes Educ. 2011 Nov-Dec;37(6):801-12. doi: 10.1177/0145721711423980. Epub 2011 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world cardiovascular effects of liraglutide: transportability analysis of the LEADER trial.利拉鲁肽的真实世界心血管效应:LEADER试验的可推广性分析
medRxiv. 2025 May 30:2025.05.12.25327466. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.12.25327466.
2
The Quality of Veterans Healthcare Administration Cardiovascular Care.退伍军人医疗管理局心血管护理的质量。
JACC Adv. 2025 Feb;4(2):101533. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101533. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
3
Comparing Quality, Costs, and Outcomes of VA and Community Primary Care for Patients with Diabetes.比较退伍军人事务部(VA)和社区初级医疗为糖尿病患者提供的医疗服务质量、成本及结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb;40(3):647-653. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08968-4. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
4
The triglycerides and glucose index is more strongly associated with metabolically healthy obesity phenotype than the lipid and obesity indices.三酰甘油和葡萄糖指数与代谢健康型肥胖表型的相关性强于脂质和肥胖指数。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2024 Apr;47(4):865-871. doi: 10.1007/s40618-023-02201-5. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
5
Higher burden of cardiometabolic and socioeconomic risk factors in women with type 2 diabetes: an analysis of the Glycemic Reduction Approaches in Diabetes (GRADE) baseline cohort.2 型糖尿病女性存在更高的心血管代谢和社会经济风险因素负担:对糖尿病血糖控制改善研究(GRADE)基线队列的分析。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2023 Apr;11(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003159.
6
Veterans Health Administration (VA) vs. Non-VA Healthcare Quality: A Systematic Review.退伍军人健康管理局 (VA) 与非退伍军人保健质量的比较:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jul;38(9):2179-2188. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08207-2. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
7
Early detection of mandible osteoradionecrosis risk in a high comorbidity veteran population.高合并症退伍军人人群中下颌骨放射性骨坏死风险的早期检测。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2023 Mar-Apr;44(2):103781. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103781. Epub 2022 Dec 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Pathophysiology-based subphenotyping of individuals at elevated risk for type 2 diabetes.基于病理生理学的 2 型糖尿病高危个体亚表型分型。
Nat Med. 2021 Jan;27(1):49-57. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1116-9. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
2
Association of Baseline Characteristics With Insulin Sensitivity and β-Cell Function in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness (GRADE) Study Cohort.糖尿病血糖控制改善途径的比较效果(GRADE)研究队列中,基线特征与胰岛素敏感性和β细胞功能的相关性。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Feb;44(2):340-349. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1787. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
3
Heterogeneity of antidiabetic treatment effect on the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2 型糖尿病患者主要不良心血管事件风险的降糖治疗效果的异质性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Sep 29;19(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01133-1.
4
Geographic and Racial/Ethnic Variation in Glycemic Control and Treatment in a National Sample of Veterans With Diabetes.在全国退伍军人糖尿病样本中,血糖控制和治疗的地理和种族/民族差异。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Oct;43(10):2460-2468. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0514. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
5
Association of the Patient-Centered Medical Home Implementation with Chronic Disease Quality in Patients with Multimorbidity.患者多病共存情况下以患者为中心的医疗之家实施与慢性病质量的关联。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):2932-2938. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06076-7. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
6
Feature Selection in Predictive Modeling: A Systematic Study on Drug Response Heterogeneity for Type II Diabetic Patients.预测建模中的特征选择:关于II型糖尿病患者药物反应异质性的系统研究
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2019 May 6;2019:295-304. eCollection 2019.
7
The National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program: Over 20 Years of Improving Hemoglobin A Measurement.国家糖化血红蛋白标准化计划:20 多年来不断改进血红蛋白 A 测量。
Clin Chem. 2019 Jul;65(7):839-848. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.296962. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
8
Type 2 diabetes genetic loci informed by multi-trait associations point to disease mechanisms and subtypes: A soft clustering analysis.多特征关联提示 2 型糖尿病遗传位点指向疾病机制和亚型:软聚类分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Sep 21;15(9):e1002654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002654. eCollection 2018 Sep.
9
Comparing Quality of Care in Veterans Affairs and Non-Veterans Affairs Settings.比较退伍军人事务部和非退伍军人事务部环境中的医疗保健质量。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1631-1638. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4433-7. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
10
Using Shared Decision-Making to Address Possible Overtreatment in Patients at High Risk for Hypoglycemia: The Veterans Health Administration's Choosing Wisely Hypoglycemia Safety Initiative.利用共同决策来解决低血糖高危患者可能存在的过度治疗问题:退伍军人健康管理局的明智选择低血糖安全倡议。
Clin Diabetes. 2018 Apr;36(2):120-127. doi: 10.2337/cd17-0060.