Suppr超能文献

糖尿病血糖控制改善途径中的退伍军人事务部(VA)和非退伍军人事务部医疗中心参与者之间并发症、心血管风险因素和糖尿病管理的差异:一项比较效果研究(GRADE)。

Differences in complications, cardiovascular risk factor, and diabetes management among participants enrolled at veterans affairs (VA) and non-VA medical centers in the glycemia reduction approaches in diabetes: A comparative effectiveness study (GRADE).

机构信息

Medical University of South Carolina and Department of Veterans Affairs, Charleston, SC, United States.

The Biostatistics Center, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Rockville, MD, United States.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022 Feb;184:109188. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109188. Epub 2021 Dec 28.

Abstract

AIMS

We evaluated differences in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) enrolled in the GRADE study at VA vs non-VA sites, focusing on cardiovascular risk factors and rates of diabetes care target achievements.

METHODS

We compared baseline characteristics between participants at VA (n = 1216) and non-VA (n = 3831) sites, stratifying analyses by cardiovascular disease (CVD) history.

RESULTS

VA and non-VA participants had similar diabetes duration (4.0 years), HbA1c (7.5%), and BMI (34 kg/m); however, VA participants had more individuals ≥ 65 years (37.3% vs 19.8%, p < 0.001), men (90.0% vs 55.2%, p < 0.001), hypertension (75.8% vs 63.6%, p < 0.001), hyperlipidemia (76.6% vs 64.6%, p < 0.001), current smokers (19.0% vs 12.1%, p < 0.001), nephropathy (20.4% vs 17.0%, p < 0.05), albuminuria (18.4% vs 15.1%, p < 0.05), and CVD (10.4% vs 5.2%, p < 0.001). In those without CVD, more VA participants were treated with lipid (70.8% vs 59.5%, p < 0.001) and blood pressure (74.9% vs 65.4%, p < 0.001) lowering medications, and had LDL-C < 70 mg/dl (32.9% vs 24.2%, p < 0.05). Among those with CVD, more VA participants had BP < 140/90 (80.2% vs 70.1%, p < 0.05) after adjusting for demographics.

CONCLUSION

GRADE participants at VA sites had more T2DM complications, greater CVD risk and were more likely to be treated with medications to reduce it, leading to more LDL-C at goal than non-VA participants, highlighting differences in diabetes populations and care.

摘要

目的

我们评估了在 VA 和非 VA 地点参加 GRADE 研究的 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者之间的差异,重点关注心血管危险因素和糖尿病治疗目标的达标率。

方法

我们比较了 VA(n=1216)和非 VA(n=3831)地点参与者的基线特征,按心血管疾病(CVD)病史进行分层分析。

结果

VA 和非 VA 参与者的糖尿病病程(4.0 年)、HbA1c(7.5%)和 BMI(34kg/m²)相似;然而,VA 参与者中有更多年龄≥65 岁的个体(37.3%比 19.8%,p<0.001)、男性(90.0%比 55.2%,p<0.001)、高血压(75.8%比 63.6%,p<0.001)、高血脂(76.6%比 64.6%,p<0.001)、当前吸烟者(19.0%比 12.1%,p<0.001)、肾病(20.4%比 17.0%,p<0.05)、白蛋白尿(18.4%比 15.1%,p<0.05)和 CVD(10.4%比 5.2%,p<0.001)。在没有 CVD 的患者中,更多的 VA 参与者接受了降脂(70.8%比 59.5%,p<0.001)和降压(74.9%比 65.4%,p<0.001)药物治疗,且 LDL-C<70mg/dl(32.9%比 24.2%,p<0.05)。在 CVD 患者中,调整人口统计学因素后,更多的 VA 参与者的血压<140/90(80.2%比 70.1%,p<0.05)。

结论

VA 地点的 GRADE 参与者有更多的 T2DM 并发症、更高的 CVD 风险,并且更有可能接受降低 CVD 风险的药物治疗,导致 LDL-C 达标率高于非 VA 参与者,突出了糖尿病患者群体和护理的差异。

相似文献

5
7
Type 1 diabetes management: Room for improvement.1 型糖尿病管理:仍有改进空间。
J Diabetes. 2023 Mar;15(3):255-263. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13368. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

2
The Quality of Veterans Healthcare Administration Cardiovascular Care.退伍军人医疗管理局心血管护理的质量。
JACC Adv. 2025 Feb;4(2):101533. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101533. Epub 2025 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验