Barrett Gregory, Seniors Robert, Okoli Joel, Chase Ayana, Henry Brandon, Mubasher Mohemed, Turner Jacquelyn
Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Education, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
J Surg Educ. 2022 May-Jun;79(3):668-675. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.12.005. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
The flipped classroom (FC) is an integrated learning paradigm that equips students with self-directed study materials before scheduled meeting times allowing for the deeper application of acquired knowledge with an instructor. There is limited data on the application of FC to clinical undergraduate medical education and particularly as it applies to a surgical clerkship.
This study is a four-year retrospective study that includes two cohorts of students who matriculated through two training paradigms, traditional classroom (TC) and FC. Information regarding the FC cohort was collected from June 2018 to July 2020 (N=166). A two-year matched historical cohort of students enrolled in the clerkship and taught with the TC paradigm from June 2016 to July 2018 was used for comparison (N=157). The primary aim of this study is to assess the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) surgery shelf performance when the FC model is utilized compared to the TC model. This study will validate a prior similar study that had a smaller cohort with different secondary endpoints. Therefore, the secondary aim of this study assesses how teaching style can affect other performance metrics of a rotation (such as clinical performance, quizzes, Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE), and practicums) and how time was utilized by faculty, staff, and students.
There was no difference in overall NBME surgery shelf performance when comparing the FC to the traditional classroom teaching (68.94 vs 70.34, P= 0.1667). Likewise, there was no difference in quiz performance. The FC did allow instructors to spend more time in other clinical components of the curriculum leading to a significant difference in student practicum (84.2 vs 88.26, P = 0.0186) and OSCE grades (87.54 vs 90.58, P <0.0001).
The surgery NBME shelf performance is not compromised by FC and therefore can be used as an alternative to traditional classroom setting for teaching medical knowledge to surgery clerkship students. In addition, the FC can improve time management for instructors allowing for improved teaching and development in other components of the surgery curriculum.
翻转课堂(FC)是一种综合学习模式,在预定的上课时间之前为学生提供自主学习材料,以便学生能与教师更深入地应用所学知识。关于翻转课堂在临床本科医学教育中的应用,特别是在外科实习中的应用,数据有限。
本研究是一项为期四年的回顾性研究,包括通过两种培训模式(传统课堂教学(TC)和翻转课堂)入学的两组学生。关于翻转课堂组的数据收集时间为2018年6月至2020年7月(N = 166)。选取2016年6月至2018年7月参加实习并采用传统课堂教学模式的两组为期两年的匹配历史队列学生进行比较(N = 157)。本研究的主要目的是评估与传统课堂模式相比,采用翻转课堂模式时美国国家医学考试委员会(NBME)外科实习成绩的表现。本研究将验证一项先前的类似研究,该研究队列较小且次要终点不同。因此,本研究的次要目的是评估教学方式如何影响轮转的其他表现指标(如临床操作、测验、客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)和实习),以及教师、工作人员和学生如何利用时间。
比较翻转课堂和传统课堂教学时,NBME外科实习的总体成绩没有差异(68.94对70.34,P = 0.1667)。同样,测验成绩也没有差异。翻转课堂确实使教师能够在课程的其他临床部分花费更多时间,从而导致学生实习成绩(84.2对88.26,P = 0.0186)和OSCE成绩(87.54对90.58,P <0.)有显著差异。
翻转课堂不会影响外科NBME实习成绩,因此可作为传统课堂教学的替代方式,向外科实习学生传授医学知识。此外,翻转课堂可以改善教师的时间管理,从而在外科课程的其他部分改进教学和发展。