Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Restoring Hip Biomechanics With and Without a Traction Table.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the study was to analyze operative time and restoration of hip biomechanics in total hip arthroplasty (THA) via direct anterior approach (DAA) with and without the use of a traction table.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared 97 cases where a traction table was used to 92 cases without a table. Ninety-seven patients received THA with a traction table (AMIS technique) and 92 patients with conventional DAA. Postoperative standard radiographs were used to analyze offset parameters and leg length. Furthermore, time for patient positioning and cut-to-suture time were evaluated.

RESULTS

Cut-to-suture time was statistically significantly shorter in the traction table group (p=0.001), whereas analysis of offset parameters (acetabular, femoral and combined) was comparable between the two groups (p=0.31, p=0.95, p=0.42). Postoperative leg length was statistically significantly different with and without traction table use (p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Both methods enable restoration of hip biomechanics with high accuracy. Further studies with prospective study designs and larger sample sizes may be needed to confirm these results.