• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人重症监护病房患者医院获得性压力性损伤的危险因素。

Risk Factors for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury in Adult Critical Care Patients.

机构信息

Phillip Kim is a postdoctoral fellow, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.

Vamsi K. Aribindi is a postdoctoral fellow, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.

出版信息

Am J Crit Care. 2022 Jan 1;31(1):42-50. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2022657.

DOI:10.4037/ajcc2022657
PMID:34972856
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurately measuring the risk of pressure injury remains the most important step for effective prevention and intervention. Relative contributions of risk factors for the incidence of pressure injury in adult critical care patients are not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a model to identify risk factors associated with hospital-acquired pressure injuries among adult critical care patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 23 806 adult patients (28 480 encounters) with an intensive care unit stay at an academic quaternary care center. Patient encounters were randomly split (7:3) into training and validation sets. The training set was used to develop a multivariable logistic regression model using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method. The model's performance was evaluated with the validation set.

RESULTS

Independent risk factors identified by logistic regression were length of hospital stay, preexisting diabetes, preexisting renal failure, maximum arterial carbon dioxide pressure, minimum arterial oxygen pressure, hypotension, gastrointestinal bleeding, cellulitis, and minimum Braden Scale score of 14 or less. On validation, the model differentiated between patients with and without pressure injury, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85, and performed better than a model with Braden Scale score alone (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

A model that identified risk factors for hospital-acquired pressure injury among adult critical care patients was developed and validated using a large data set of clinical variables. This model may aid in selecting high-risk patients for focused interventions to prevent formation of hospital-acquired pressure injuries.

摘要

背景

准确测量压疮风险仍然是有效预防和干预的最重要步骤。成人重症监护患者压疮发生率相关风险因素的相对贡献尚不清楚。

目的

开发和验证一种模型,以确定与成人重症监护患者医院获得性压疮相关的风险因素。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了在学术四级护理中心接受重症监护的 23806 名成年患者(28480 例次)。患者例次随机(7:3)分为训练集和验证集。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子方法,利用训练集开发多变量逻辑回归模型。使用验证集评估模型的性能。

结果

逻辑回归确定的独立风险因素包括住院时间、既往糖尿病、既往肾衰竭、最大动脉二氧化碳分压、最低动脉氧分压、低血压、胃肠道出血、蜂窝织炎和Braden 量表评分低至 14 分。在验证中,该模型可区分有和无压疮的患者,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.85,且优于仅使用Braden 量表评分的模型(P <.001)。

结论

使用临床变量的大型数据集开发和验证了一种识别成人重症监护患者医院获得性压疮风险因素的模型。该模型可以帮助选择高危患者,以便进行有针对性的干预,预防医院获得性压疮的形成。

相似文献

1
Risk Factors for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury in Adult Critical Care Patients.成人重症监护病房患者医院获得性压力性损伤的危险因素。
Am J Crit Care. 2022 Jan 1;31(1):42-50. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2022657.
2
All at-risk patients are not created equal: analysis of Braden pressure ulcer risk scores to identify specific risks.并非所有高危患者都一样:分析布雷登压疮风险评分以识别特定风险。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012 May-Jun;39(3):282-91. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182435715.
3
Incidence of pressure ulcers in a neurologic intensive care unit.神经重症监护病房中压疮的发生率。
Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2):283-90. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00011.
4
Risk Factors for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury in Surgical Critical Care Patients.外科重症监护患者医院获得性压力性损伤的危险因素。
Am J Crit Care. 2020 Nov 1;29(6):e128-e134. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2020810.
5
The Challenge of Predicting Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients. A Multicenter Cohort Study.预测危重症患者压疮的挑战。一项多中心队列研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Oct;13(10):1775-1783. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201603-154OC.
6
Hospital acquired pressure injury prediction in surgical critical care patients.外科重症监护患者获得性压疮预测。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01371-z.
7
Dynamic Risk Prediction for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury in Adult Critical Care Patients.成年重症监护患者医院获得性压力性损伤的动态风险预测
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Nov 11;3(11):e0580. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000580. eCollection 2021 Nov.
8
Predictive validity of the Braden scale for patients in intensive care units.Braden 量表对重症监护病房患者的预测效度。
Am J Crit Care. 2013 Nov;22(6):514-20. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2013991.
9
Assessment of the accuracy of the CALCULATE scale for pressure injury in critically ill patients.评估CALCULATE量表对危重症患者压力性损伤的评估准确性。
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Mar;36(2):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.12.010. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
10
Identifying Risk Factors for Pressure Injury in Adult Critical Care Patients.识别成人重症监护患者压疮的风险因素。
Am J Crit Care. 2020 May 1;29(3):204-213. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2020243.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Braden Score-Guided Targeted Nursing Interventions on Preventing Intraoperative Pressure Ulcers in Aortic Dissection Surgery.Braden评分指导下的针对性护理干预对预防主动脉夹层手术术中压疮的效果
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Aug 18;18:5015-5023. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S529708. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing the efficacy of ultrasound deep tissue evaluation in predicting hospital-acquired pressure injuries: A diagnostic study.评估超声深部组织评估在预测医院获得性压力性损伤中的有效性:一项诊断性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 11;104(28):e43268. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043268.
3
Impact of Care Bundles Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
护理集束措施预防医院获得性压力性损伤的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Nurs Open. 2025 Mar;12(3):e70173. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70173.
4
A Tracheostomy Support Device to Reduce Tracheostomy-Related Pressure Injury.一种用于减少气管造口相关压力性损伤的气管造口支撑装置。
Respir Care. 2024 Jun 28;69(7):839-846. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11160.