• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Braden评分指导下的针对性护理干预对预防主动脉夹层手术术中压疮的效果

Effect of Braden Score-Guided Targeted Nursing Interventions on Preventing Intraoperative Pressure Ulcers in Aortic Dissection Surgery.

作者信息

Wang Qiao-Zhi, Jia Wen-Cheng, Tian Yu-Quan

机构信息

Department of Operation Room, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, 250031, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Aug 18;18:5015-5023. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S529708. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S529708
PMID:40862263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12372843/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to evaluate the effect of Braden score-guided targeted nursing interventions on preventing intraoperative pressure ulcers in aortic dissection (AD) surgery.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients who underwent AD surgery at the hospital between December 2023 and December 2024 were selected and randomly assigned to either the study group or the control group, with 60 patients in each group. The control group received routine nursing care, while the study group received targeted nursing interventions guided by the Braden score in addition to routine care. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the results between the two groups.

RESULTS

Following the implementation of targeted nursing interventions guided by the Braden score, the total nursing behavior scores for pressure ulcer prevention (95.67±3.41 vs 83.95±5.16), including all individual dimension scores (preoperative care: 56.71±2.43 vs 48.53±4.91; intraoperative care: 22.39±1.68 vs 17.64±2.75; postoperative care: 13.65±2.49 vs 10.48±2.51), were significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group ( < 0.05). The incidence of intraoperative pressure ulcers was notably lower in the study group (2.5%) than in the control group (17.5%) ( < 0.05). Additionally, the pressure ulcer area was significantly smaller (2.11±0.36 vs 4.98±1.14 cm), and the duration of pressure ulcers was markedly shorter in the study group compared to the control group (2.73±1.24 vs 7.86±1.65 days) ( < 0.05). Nursing satisfaction levels were also significantly higher in the study group (97.5% vs 82.5%) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Targeted nursing interventions guided by the Braden score demonstrated effectiveness in identifying risks of intraoperative pressure ulcers. The designed interventions enhanced the quality of nursing care in the operating room, reduced the incidence of pressure ulcers, and improved patient satisfaction.

摘要

目的

本前瞻性随机对照研究旨在评估Braden评分指导下的针对性护理干预对预防主动脉夹层(AD)手术术中压疮的效果。

方法

选取2023年12月至2024年12月期间在该医院接受AD手术的120例患者,随机分为研究组和对照组,每组60例。对照组接受常规护理,研究组在常规护理基础上接受Braden评分指导下的针对性护理干预。进行统计分析以比较两组结果。

结果

实施Braden评分指导下的针对性护理干预后,研究组预防压疮的总护理行为评分(95.67±3.41 vs 83.95±5.16),包括所有个体维度评分(术前护理:56.71±2.43 vs 48.53±4.91;术中护理:22.39±1.68 vs 17.64±2.75;术后护理:13.65±2.49 vs 10.48±2.51)均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组术中压疮发生率(2.5%)明显低于对照组(17.5%)(P<0.05)。此外,研究组压疮面积显著更小(2.11±0.36 vs 4.98±1.14 cm),压疮持续时间明显短于对照组(2.73±1.24 vs 7.86±1.65天)(P<0.05)。研究组的护理满意度也显著更高(97.5% vs 82.5%)(P<0.05)。

结论

Braden评分指导下的针对性护理干预在识别术中压疮风险方面显示出有效性。所设计的干预提高了手术室护理质量,降低了压疮发生率,并提高了患者满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a3/12372843/30a0b01c2901/JMDH-18-5015-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a3/12372843/30a0b01c2901/JMDH-18-5015-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a3/12372843/30a0b01c2901/JMDH-18-5015-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Braden Score-Guided Targeted Nursing Interventions on Preventing Intraoperative Pressure Ulcers in Aortic Dissection Surgery.Braden评分指导下的针对性护理干预对预防主动脉夹层手术术中压疮的效果
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Aug 18;18:5015-5023. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S529708. eCollection 2025.
2
The Impact of Perioperative Comfort Nursing Combined With Targeted Operating Room Nursing on Postoperative Stress Response and Nursing Satisfaction in Colorectal Cancer Patients.围手术期舒适护理联合手术室针对性护理对结直肠癌患者术后应激反应及护理满意度的影响
Ann Ital Chir. 2025 Aug 10;96(8):1089-1102. doi: 10.62713/aic.4112.
3
Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of bundled care interventions on pressure ulcer incidence in neurosurgical patients.综合护理干预对神经外科患者压疮发生率的临床效果评估。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;13:1576633. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1576633. eCollection 2025.
4
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
5
Repositioning for pressure ulcer prevention in adults.成人压力性溃疡预防中的体位调整
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 3;2014(4):CD009958. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009958.pub2.
6
Beds, overlays and mattresses for preventing and treating pressure ulcers: an overview of Cochrane Reviews and network meta-analysis.预防和治疗压疮的床、垫板和床垫:Cochrane 综述和网络荟萃分析概述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 16;8(8):CD013761. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013761.pub2.
7
Specialist breast care nurses for support of women with breast cancer.专科乳腺护理护士为乳腺癌女性提供支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 3;2(2):CD005634. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005634.pub3.
8
Impact of behavior change theory-based nursing interventions on cardiac function recovery and quality of life among cardiac surgery patients with cardiopulmonary bypass.基于行为改变理论的护理干预对体外循环心脏手术患者心功能恢复及生活质量的影响
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Jan 31;20(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03219-3.
9
Perioperative lung expansion and pulmonary outcomes after open abdominal surgery versus usual care in the USA (PRIME-AIR): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.美国开放性腹部手术围手术期肺扩张与肺部结局对比常规护理(PRIME-AIR):一项多中心、随机、对照、3期试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2025 May;13(5):447-459. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(25)00040-2. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
10
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of four risk assessment scales in predicting the risk of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in adult surgical patients: a prospective study.四种风险评估量表预测成人手术患者术中获得性压力性损伤风险的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
J Int Med Res. 2023 Oct;51(10):3000605231207530. doi: 10.1177/03000605231207530.
2
Effect of "micromovement" in preventing intraoperative acquired pressure injuries among patients undergoing surgery in supine position.“微移动”对预防仰卧位手术患者术中获得性压力性损伤的影响。
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct 17;21(2). doi: 10.1111/iwj.14408.
3
Guidelines in Practice: Prevention of Perioperative Pressure Injury.
实践指南:围手术期压力性损伤的预防
AORN J. 2023 Jul;118(1):37-44. doi: 10.1002/aorn.13948.
4
Incidence and risk factors for pressure injuries in patients who have undergone vascular operations: a scoping review.血管手术患者压疮的发生率及危险因素:范围综述。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Feb 13;28(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01036-3.
5
Effect of a Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury (HAPI) Risk Score on HAPI Rates in Patients With Vascular Diseases.医院获得性压力性损伤(HAPI)风险评分对血管疾病患者 HAPI 发生率的影响。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2023;50(1):13-18. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000944.
6
Prevalence and factors associated with pressure injury in patients undergoing open heart surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.接受心脏直视手术患者的压疮发生率及相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Aug;20(6):2321-2333. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14040. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
7
Munro Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale in Adult Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia in the Operating Room.成人患者全身麻醉手术中使用 Munro 压疮风险评估量表。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Mar 21;2022:4157803. doi: 10.1155/2022/4157803. eCollection 2022.
8
Pressure ulcer prevalence and prevention interventions - A ten-year nationwide survey in Sweden.压力性溃疡患病率及预防干预措施-瑞典十年全国性调查。
Int Wound J. 2022 Nov;19(7):1736-1747. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13779. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
9
Pressure injuries in surgical patients: a comparison of Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales.手术患者的压疮:Norton、Braden 和 Waterlow 风险评估量表的比较。
J Wound Care. 2022 Feb 2;31(2):170-177. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.2.170.
10
Risk Factors for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury in Adult Critical Care Patients.成人重症监护病房患者医院获得性压力性损伤的危险因素。
Am J Crit Care. 2022 Jan 1;31(1):42-50. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2022657.