Shui Amy M, Kim Phillip, Aribindi Vamsi, Huang Chiung-Yu, Kim Mi-Ok, Rangarajan Sachin, Schorger Kaelan, Aldrich J Matthew, Lee Hanmin
Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Nov 11;3(11):e0580. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000580. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Accurately measuring the risk of pressure injury remains the most important step for effective prevention and intervention. Time-dependent risk factors for pressure injury development in the adult intensive care unit setting are not well understood.
To develop and validate a dynamic risk prediction model to estimate the risk of developing a hospital-acquired pressure injury among adult ICU patients.
ICU admission data were split into training and validation sets. With death as a competing event, both static and dynamic Fine-Gray models were developed to predict hospital-acquired pressure injury development less than 24, 72, and 168 hours postadmission. Model performance was evaluated using Wolbers' concordance index, Brier score, net reclassification improvement, and integrated discrimination improvement.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of ICU patients in a tertiary care hospital located in San Francisco, CA, from November 2013 to August 2017.
Data were extracted from electronic medical records of 18,019 ICU patients (age ≥ 18 yr; 21,220 encounters). Record of hospital-acquired pressure injury data was captured in our institution's incident reporting system. The information is periodically reviewed by our wound care team. Presence of hospital-acquired pressure injury during an encounter and hospital-acquired pressure injury diagnosis date were provided.
The dynamic model predicting hospital-acquired pressure injury more than 24 hours postadmission, including predictors age, body mass index, lactate serum, Braden scale score, and use of vasopressor and antifungal medications, had adequate discrimination ability within 6 days from time of prediction ( = 0.73). All dynamic models produced more accurate risk estimates than static models within 26 days postadmission. There were no significant differences in Brier scores between dynamic and static models.
A dynamic risk prediction model predicting hospital-acquired pressure injury development less than 24 hours postadmission in ICU patients for up to 7 days postadmission was developed and validated using a large dataset of clinical variables readily available in the electronic medical record.
准确测量压力性损伤风险仍然是有效预防和干预的最重要步骤。在成人重症监护病房环境中,压力性损伤发生的时间依赖性风险因素尚未得到充分了解。
开发并验证一个动态风险预测模型,以估计成年重症监护病房患者发生医院获得性压力性损伤的风险。
将重症监护病房入院数据分为训练集和验证集。以死亡作为竞争事件,开发静态和动态Fine-Gray模型,以预测入院后不到24、72和168小时发生的医院获得性压力性损伤。使用沃尔伯斯一致性指数、布里尔评分、净重新分类改善和综合鉴别改善来评估模型性能。
我们对2013年11月至2017年8月位于加利福尼亚州旧金山的一家三级护理医院的重症监护病房患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。
从18019名重症监护病房患者(年龄≥18岁;21220次就诊)的电子病历中提取数据。医院获得性压力性损伤数据记录在我们机构的事件报告系统中。伤口护理团队定期审查这些信息。提供了就诊期间医院获得性压力性损伤的记录以及医院获得性压力性损伤的诊断日期。
预测入院后超过24小时发生医院获得性压力性损伤的动态模型,包括预测因素年龄、体重指数(BMI)、血清乳酸、布拉德恩量表评分以及血管升压药和抗真菌药物的使用,在预测时间的6天内具有足够的鉴别能力(C统计量=0.73)。所有动态模型在入院后26天内产生的风险估计比静态模型更准确。动态模型和静态模型之间的布里尔评分没有显著差异。
使用电子病历中随时可用的大量临床变量数据集,开发并验证了一个动态风险预测模型,该模型可预测重症监护病房患者入院后不到24小时发生医院获得性压力性损伤,直至入院后7天。