• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

去殖民化是否能有效预防人群中携带潘顿-瓦伦丁白细胞毒素阳性金黄色葡萄球菌感染?一项系统评价。

Is decolonization to prevent Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive Staphylococcus aureus infection in the population effective? A systematic review.

机构信息

Public Health England, London, UK.

Public Health England, London, UK.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2022 Mar;121:91-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.12.019. Epub 2021 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2021.12.019
PMID:34973237
Abstract

Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) -producing Staphylococcus aureus is associated with recurrent skin and soft tissue infections and occasionally invasive infections. There is limited evidence to support current public health guidance on decolonization of cases and household contacts. This systematic review (CRD42020189906) investigated the efficacy of decolonization against PVL-positive S. aureus to inform future public health practice. It included studies of cases with PVL-positive infections providing information on the efficacy of decolonization of cases, carriers, or contacts of cases. Studies were assessed for the risk of bias using the GRADE approach and summarized to inform a narrative synthesis. The search identified 20, mostly observational, studies with small samples and lacking control groups. Studies with longer follow-ups found that, while early post-decolonization screening was negative for most individuals, testing over subsequent months identified re-colonization in some. There is no high-quality evidence to show whether decolonization is effective in reducing (re)infection or long-term carriage of PVL-positive S. aureus and the low-quality evidence available indicates it may not be effective in eradicating carriage or reducing future disease. Furthermore, there may be risks associated with decolonization, e.g., potentially increased risk of infection from other microbes, opportunity costs and negative impacts of repeated testing for asymptomatic carriage. Further research is required to better understand what affects the ability of decolonization efforts to reduce risk to cases and their contacts, including strain, host and environmental factors.

摘要

产 Panton-Valentine 白细胞素(PVL)金黄色葡萄球菌与复发性皮肤和软组织感染以及偶尔的侵袭性感染有关。目前,关于病例和家庭接触者去定植的公共卫生指南主要基于有限的证据。本系统评价(CRD42020189906)调查了去定植对 PVL 阳性金黄色葡萄球菌的疗效,以为未来的公共卫生实践提供信息。它纳入了 PVL 阳性感染病例的研究,提供了关于病例、携带者或病例接触者去定植疗效的信息。研究使用 GRADE 方法评估偏倚风险,并进行总结以提供叙述性综合分析。检索发现 20 项研究,大多为观察性研究,样本量小,缺乏对照组。随访时间较长的研究发现,虽然大多数个体在去定植后的早期筛查呈阴性,但在随后的几个月中进行检测,发现一些个体再次定植。没有高质量证据表明去定植是否能有效降低(再)感染或 PVL 阳性金黄色葡萄球菌的长期携带,而现有低质量证据表明,它可能无法有效根除携带或减少未来疾病。此外,去定植可能存在风险,例如,来自其他微生物的感染风险增加、机会成本以及对无症状携带进行重复检测的负面影响。需要进一步研究以更好地了解定植清除努力降低病例及其接触者风险的能力受到哪些因素的影响,包括菌株、宿主和环境因素。

相似文献

1
Is decolonization to prevent Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive Staphylococcus aureus infection in the population effective? A systematic review.去殖民化是否能有效预防人群中携带潘顿-瓦伦丁白细胞毒素阳性金黄色葡萄球菌感染?一项系统评价。
J Hosp Infect. 2022 Mar;121:91-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.12.019. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
2
Systematic review of the effectiveness of preventing and treating Staphylococcus aureus carriage in reducing peritoneal catheter-related infections.预防和治疗金黄色葡萄球菌定植在减少腹膜导管相关感染方面有效性的系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Jul;11(23):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-66. doi: 10.3310/hta11230.
3
Interventions for the eradication of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in people with cystic fibrosis.根除囊性纤维化患者体内耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 21;7(7):CD009650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009650.pub4.
4
Interventions for the eradication of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in people with cystic fibrosis.针对囊性纤维化患者中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的清除干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 13;12(12):CD009650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009650.pub5.
5
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Inhaled mannitol for cystic fibrosis.吸入用甘露醇治疗囊性纤维化。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 9;2(2):CD008649. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008649.pub3.
8
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
Telehealth interventions: remote monitoring and consultations for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).远程医疗干预:针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的远程监测和咨询。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 20;7(7):CD013196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013196.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
In Reply.作为回复。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2023 May 30;120(21):375-376. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0023.