• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

36 例患者接受机器人导航引导骶髂关节融合术的临床结果。

Clinical results following robotic navigation guidance for sacroiliac joint fusion in 36 patients.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2022 Jan;52(1):E6. doi: 10.3171/2021.10.FOCUS21523.

DOI:10.3171/2021.10.FOCUS21523
PMID:34973676
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the authors aimed to describe a new technique of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion using a robotic navigation guidance system and to document clinical results with patient-reported visual analog scale (VAS) scores.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with SIJ dysfunction were surgically treated using 2 hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated, threaded screws with the aid of the robotic navigation system. In a total of 36 patients, 51 SIJs were fused during the study period. Patients' VAS scores were used to determine clinical improvement in pain. Postoperative imaging at routine intervals during the follow-up period was also performed for assessment of radiological fusion. In addition, complication events were recorded, including reoperations.

RESULTS

All 36 patients had successful fusion evidenced by both CT and clinical assessment at the final follow-up. Two patients underwent reoperation because of screw loosening. The mean preoperative VAS score was 7.2 ± 1.1, and the mean 12-month postoperative VAS score was 1.6 ± 1.46. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05) and demonstrated a substantial clinical improvement in pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic navigation-assisted SIJ fusion using 2 HA-coated, threaded screws placed across the joint was an acceptable technique that demonstrated reliable clinical results with a significant improvement in patient-reported VAS pain scores.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述一种使用机器人导航引导系统进行骶髂关节 (SIJ) 融合的新技术,并通过患者报告的视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 评分记录临床结果。

方法

诊断为 SIJ 功能障碍的患者在机器人导航系统的辅助下接受了 2 羟基磷灰石 (HA) 涂层、螺纹螺钉的手术治疗。在研究期间,共有 36 名患者的 51 个 SIJ 接受了融合。患者的 VAS 评分用于确定疼痛的临床改善。在随访期间的常规间隔还进行了术后影像学检查,以评估影像学融合。此外,还记录了并发症事件,包括再次手术。

结果

所有 36 名患者在最终随访时均通过 CT 和临床评估成功融合。有 2 名患者因螺钉松动而再次手术。术前 VAS 评分的平均值为 7.2 ± 1.1,术后 12 个月的 VAS 评分为 1.6 ± 1.46。这一差异具有统计学意义 (p < 0.05),表明疼痛的临床改善显著。

结论

使用 2 个 HA 涂层、螺纹螺钉穿过关节进行机器人导航辅助 SIJ 融合是一种可接受的技术,可通过患者报告的 VAS 疼痛评分显著改善获得可靠的临床结果。

相似文献

1
Clinical results following robotic navigation guidance for sacroiliac joint fusion in 36 patients.36 例患者接受机器人导航引导骶髂关节融合术的临床结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2022 Jan;52(1):E6. doi: 10.3171/2021.10.FOCUS21523.
2
Computed tomography assessment of robotic versus fluoroscopic implant accuracy in sacroiliac joint fusion.计算机断层扫描评估机器人与荧光透视引导在骶髂关节融合中的植入物准确性。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 May 31;41(3):378-384. doi: 10.3171/2024.3.SPINE231109. Print 2024 Sep 1.
3
Are Hydroxyapatite-Coated Screws a Good Option for Sacroiliac Joint Stabilization? A Prospective Outcome Study.羟基磷灰石涂层螺钉在骶髂关节稳定中的应用:一项前瞻性结局研究。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;148:e164-e171. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.104. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
4
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using a Novel Hydroxyapatite-Coated Screw: Preliminary 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results of a 2-Year Prospective Study.使用新型羟基磷灰石涂层螺钉的微创骶髂关节融合术:一项为期2年的前瞻性研究的初步1年临床和影像学结果
World Neurosurg. 2017 May;101:493-497. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.046. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
5
Robotic versus nonrobotic sacroiliac joint fusion.机器人辅助与非机器人辅助骶髂关节融合术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jul;55(1):E4. doi: 10.3171/2023.4.FOCUS23146.
6
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Fusion Rates and Clinical Improvement Using Minimally Invasive Approach and Intraoperative Navigation and Robotic Guidance.骶髂关节融合术:采用微创方法、术中导航和机器人引导的融合率及临床改善情况
Asian Spine J. 2022 Dec;16(6):882-889. doi: 10.31616/asj.2021.0058. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
7
Hydroxyapatite-Coated Screws Versus Titanium Triangular Dowels for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Results From a Nonrandomized Prospective Outcome Study.羟基磷灰石涂层螺钉与钛三角骨棒用于骶髂关节融合:一项非随机前瞻性结局研究的结果。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Apr;184:e367-e373. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.01.131. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
8
Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.三叶状钛植入物用于骶髂关节融合。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Apr;28(4):727-734. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5860-1. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
9
Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint.骶髂关节稳定术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(2 Suppl):Editorial. doi: 10.3171/2013.V2.FOCUS13273.
10
Fusion and patient-reported outcomes after navigated decortication and direct arthrodesis in minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using cylindrical threaded implants: a case series and literature review.导航下减压和直接关节融合治疗微创骶髂关节融合中使用圆柱螺纹植入物后的融合和患者报告结局:病例系列和文献复习。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jul;55(1):E2. doi: 10.3171/2023.4.FOCUS23145.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive lateral, posterior, and posterolateral sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创外侧、后侧及后外侧骶髂关节融合术治疗腰痛:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Int Med Res. 2025 Feb;53(2):3000605251315300. doi: 10.1177/03000605251315300.
2
American Society of Pain and Neuroscience Best Practice (ASPN) Guideline for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Disorders.美国疼痛与神经科学学会骶髂关节疾病治疗最佳实践(ASPN)指南
J Pain Res. 2024 May 3;17:1601-1638. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S464393. eCollection 2024.
3
Minimally Invasive SI Joint Fusion Procedures for Chronic SI Joint Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.
慢性骶髂关节疼痛的微创骶髂关节融合手术:安全性和有效性的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Dec 26;17(6):794-808. doi: 10.14444/8543.