Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Siltavuorenpenger 5, 00170 Helsinki, Finland.
Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Siltavuorenpenger 5, 00170 Helsinki, Finland.
Prev Med. 2022 Feb;155:106948. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106948. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
The present systematic review aimed to investigate the methodological quality and the effects of fundamental motor skills and physical activity interventions on cognitive and academic skills in typically developing 3 to 7-year-old children. The review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A literature search was carried out in April 2020 using seven electronic databases. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed with the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) Quality Assessment Tool. Cohen's d effect size calculations and post hoc power analyses were conducted for the included studies. A total of 35 studies, representing 2472 children met the inclusion criteria. Two of the studies demonstrated a strong methodological quality, while 24 were considered as methodologically weak. The majority (71%) of the included studies demonstrated the beneficial effects of the intervention on cognitive and academic skills. The most evidence was found for executive functions, language, and numeracy, and the effects were largest in enhancing memory. The effects were larger on cognitive and academic skills in the combined interventions compared to only fundamental motor skill and physical activity interventions, while fundamental motor skill interventions had larger effects than physical activity interventions. These findings indicate that it may be possible to support typically developing preschoolers' cognitive and academic learning with fundamental motor skill and physical activity interventions. However, most of the studies in this field have a weak methodological quality and thus, the presented evidence was considered weak in nature.
本系统评价旨在调查基本运动技能和身体活动干预对 3 至 7 岁发育正常儿童认知和学业技能的方法学质量和效果。本评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 声明进行和报告。2020 年 4 月,使用 7 个电子数据库进行了文献检索。研究的方法学质量采用有效公共卫生实践项目 (EPHPP) 质量评估工具进行评估。对纳入的研究进行了 Cohen's d 效应大小计算和事后功效分析。共有 35 项研究,代表 2472 名儿童符合纳入标准。其中两项研究显示出较强的方法学质量,而 24 项研究被认为方法学较弱。大多数(71%)纳入的研究表明干预对认知和学业技能有有益的影响。在执行功能、语言和数学方面发现的证据最多,在增强记忆力方面的效果最大。与仅进行基本运动技能和身体活动干预相比,综合干预对认知和学业技能的效果更大,而基本运动技能干预的效果大于身体活动干预。这些发现表明,通过基本运动技能和身体活动干预,可能支持发育正常的学龄前儿童的认知和学业学习。然而,该领域的大多数研究方法学质量较弱,因此,所呈现的证据被认为性质较弱。