• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于认知诊断评估的学生科学解释的国际比较研究

An International Comparative Study of Students' Scientific Explanation Based on Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment.

作者信息

Hu Tao, Yang Jing, Wu Rongxiu, Wu Xiaopeng

机构信息

College of Teacher Education, Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.

School of Education, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 17;12:795497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.795497. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.795497
PMID:34975697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8718451/
Abstract

Scientific explanation is one of the most core concepts in science education, and its mastery level is crucial for a deep understanding of the nature of science. As a new generation of assessment theory, cognitive diagnostic assessment (CDA) can get the knowledge of students' mastery of fine-grained knowledge. Based on the extant research, this research has formed eight attributes of scientific explanation concepts. By coding the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) test items, a CAD tool was formed. Data collected from 574 Grade 4 students in Hangzhou, China, combined with the data of the United States, Singapore, Australia, the United Kingdom, and Russia, were used in our study. The Deterministic Inputs, Noisy "And" gate (DINA) model was used to analyze the results from three aspects: the probability of mastery of attributes, the international comparison of knowledge states, and the analysis of learning paths. This study provided a new perspective from a CDA approach on the assessment of scientific explanation.

摘要

科学解释是科学教育中最核心的概念之一,其掌握程度对于深入理解科学本质至关重要。作为新一代评估理论,认知诊断评估(CDA)能够获取学生对细粒度知识的掌握情况。基于现有研究,本研究形成了科学解释概念的八个属性。通过对国际数学和科学趋势研究(TIMSS)测试项目进行编码,形成了一个认知诊断评估工具。本研究使用了从中国杭州574名四年级学生收集的数据,并结合了美国、新加坡、澳大利亚、英国和俄罗斯的数据。采用确定性输入、噪声“与”门(DINA)模型从三个方面分析结果:属性掌握概率、知识状态的国际比较以及学习路径分析。本研究从认知诊断评估方法的角度为科学解释的评估提供了一个新视角。

相似文献

1
An International Comparative Study of Students' Scientific Explanation Based on Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment.基于认知诊断评估的学生科学解释的国际比较研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 17;12:795497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.795497. eCollection 2021.
2
International comparative study of learning trajectories based on TIMSS 2019 G4 data on cognitive diagnostic models.基于2019年国际数学和科学趋势研究(TIMSS)四年级数据的认知诊断模型的学习轨迹国际比较研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 27;14:1241656. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1241656. eCollection 2023.
3
Measuring students' learning progressions in energy using cognitive diagnostic models.使用认知诊断模型测量学生在能源方面的学习进程。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 9;13:892884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.892884. eCollection 2022.
4
International Comparative Study on PISA Mathematics Achievement Test Based on Cognitive Diagnostic Models.基于认知诊断模型的国际学生评估项目数学成绩测试比较研究
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 9;11:2230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02230. eCollection 2020.
5
The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.使用 Rasch 和确定性输入、嘈杂“与”门诊断分类模型对每个内容领域的掌握程度的准确性和一致性:一项基于韩国医师执照考试数据的模拟研究和真实世界分析。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:15. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.15. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
6
Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.使用确定性输入、噪声与门(DINA)模型,对韩国医师执照考试各领域项目参数和考生掌握概率进行估计。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:35. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.35. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
7
Cognitive model construction and assessment of data analysis ability based on CDA.基于语料库驱动方法的认知模型构建与数据分析能力评估
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 15;13:1009142. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009142. eCollection 2022.
8
International Comparative Study of Statistics Learning Trajectories Based on PISA Data on Cognitive Diagnostic Models.基于国际学生评估项目(PISA)认知诊断模型数据的统计学习轨迹国际比较研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 20;12:657858. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657858. eCollection 2021.
9
Comparison among cognitive diagnostic models for the TIMSS 2007 fourth grade mathematics assessment.2007年国际数学和科学趋势研究(TIMSS)四年级数学评估认知诊断模型之间的比较。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 2;13(2):e0188691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188691. eCollection 2018.
10
First-Order Learning Models With the GDINA: Estimation With the EM Algorithm and Applications.基于GDINA的一阶学习模型:使用期望最大化算法的估计及应用
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 May;45(3):143-158. doi: 10.1177/0146621621990746. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial Reasoning and Its Contribution to Mathematical Performance Across Different Content Domains: Evidence from Chinese Students.空间推理及其对不同内容领域数学成绩的贡献:来自中国学生的证据。
J Intell. 2025 Mar 24;13(4):41. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13040041.

本文引用的文献

1
International Comparative Study on PISA Mathematics Achievement Test Based on Cognitive Diagnostic Models.基于认知诊断模型的国际学生评估项目数学成绩测试比较研究
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 9;11:2230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02230. eCollection 2020.
2
Comparison among cognitive diagnostic models for the TIMSS 2007 fourth grade mathematics assessment.2007年国际数学和科学趋势研究(TIMSS)四年级数学评估认知诊断模型之间的比较。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 2;13(2):e0188691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188691. eCollection 2018.
3
Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
结合项目反应时间的认知诊断建模
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2018 May;71(2):262-286. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12114. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
4
Hierarchical diagnostic classification models: a family of models for estimating and testing attribute hierarchies.分层诊断分类模型:用于估计和检验属性层次结构的一类模型。
Psychometrika. 2014 Apr;79(2):317-39. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9362-0. Epub 2014 Jan 30.