• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

I期至IV期直肠癌的五年随访研究,包括表皮生长因子受体免疫表达和p21免疫活性。

Five-year follow-up study of stage I-IV rectal cancer including EGFR immunoexpression and p21 immunoactivity.

作者信息

Kozłowska-Geller Monika, Głuszek Stanisław, Lewitowicz Piotr

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Institute of Medical Science, Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.

Department of Surgery and Surgical Nursing, Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.

出版信息

Prz Gastroenterol. 2021;16(4):330-338. doi: 10.5114/pg.2021.104980. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

DOI:10.5114/pg.2021.104980
PMID:34976241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8690949/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Both environmental and genetic factors increase the likelihood of developing rectal cancer.

AIM

To assess the EGFR and p21 immunoreactivity in rectal cancer and to assess its relationship with the clinical outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Applying exclusion criteria, 102 patients with stage I-IV rectal cancer, who had undergone scheduled surgery during the period 2005-2011, were included in the study. There was a follow-up study with a span of 5 years from the date of the surgery. Immunohistochemistry using epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR Ab10, Clone111.6) and antibodies against p21 (p21 (Clone H252)) was performed to detect overexpression of the targeted receptor. Digital analysis of positive reactions of membranes and nuclei was performed utilizing Visiopharm.

RESULTS

The degree of EGFR intensity (log OR = 0.854, OR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.14-4.85, = 0.021) is a significant factor in the prognosis of death within 2 years after surgery. The OS curve showed a significant decrease after 40 months from the date of surgery in the cases where EGFR had high expression. The ROC curve for cancer stage, according to the UICC classification and EGFR expression, in order to predict 2-year RFS, reached a high specificity value (ROC = 0.81, = 0.0408). The analysis showed no statistically significant differences in the survival curves of patients in groups with immunoreactivity of p21 protein at 0, 1, 2, 3 ( = 0.6453 in the log-rank test). Also, it is not a significant risk factor for death (HR = 0.915, = 0.7842) or for tumor dissemination (HR = 0.94, = 0.9426).

CONCLUSIONS

The determination of EGFR immunoreactivity is important in the monitoring and treatment of patients with rectal cancer, as opposed to p21.

摘要

引言

环境因素和遗传因素均会增加患直肠癌的可能性。

目的

评估直肠癌中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)和p21的免疫反应性,并评估其与临床结局的关系。

材料与方法

应用排除标准,纳入2005年至2011年期间接受择期手术的102例I-IV期直肠癌患者。自手术日期起进行为期5年的随访研究。采用表皮生长因子受体(EGFR Ab10,克隆号111.6)和抗p21抗体(p21(克隆号H252))进行免疫组织化学检测,以检测靶向受体的过表达。利用Visiopharm对细胞膜和细胞核的阳性反应进行数字分析。

结果

EGFR强度程度(对数OR = 0.854,OR = 2.35,95%置信区间:1.14 - 4.85,P = 0.021)是术后2年内死亡预后的重要因素。EGFR高表达的病例,自手术日期起40个月后总生存(OS)曲线显著下降。根据国际抗癌联盟(UICC)分类和EGFR表达绘制的预测2年无复发生存(RFS)的癌症分期ROC曲线,达到了较高的特异性值(ROC = 0.81,P = 0.0408)。分析显示,p21蛋白免疫反应性为0、1、2、3级的患者组生存曲线无统计学显著差异(对数秩检验中P = 0.6453)。此外,它不是死亡(风险比(HR)= 0.915,P = 0.7842)或肿瘤播散(HR = 0.94,P = 0.9426)的显著危险因素。

结论

与p21相反,EGFR免疫反应性的测定在直肠癌患者的监测和治疗中具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/8690949/9b1a70f23d66/PG-16-43700-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/8690949/365b766f8599/PG-16-43700-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/8690949/e9f43c80810d/PG-16-43700-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/8690949/265d116475a3/PG-16-43700-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/8690949/c969be74e3e0/PG-16-43700-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/8690949/73ecbfa6414e/PG-16-43700-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/8690949/b094f9c706e0/PG-16-43700-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/8690949/47d8963d5fca/PG-16-43700-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/8690949/9b1a70f23d66/PG-16-43700-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/8690949/365b766f8599/PG-16-43700-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/8690949/e9f43c80810d/PG-16-43700-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/8690949/265d116475a3/PG-16-43700-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/8690949/c969be74e3e0/PG-16-43700-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/8690949/73ecbfa6414e/PG-16-43700-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/8690949/b094f9c706e0/PG-16-43700-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/8690949/47d8963d5fca/PG-16-43700-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/8690949/9b1a70f23d66/PG-16-43700-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Five-year follow-up study of stage I-IV rectal cancer including EGFR immunoexpression and p21 immunoactivity.I期至IV期直肠癌的五年随访研究,包括表皮生长因子受体免疫表达和p21免疫活性。
Prz Gastroenterol. 2021;16(4):330-338. doi: 10.5114/pg.2021.104980. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
2
A five-year follow up study of stage I-IV of rectal cancer with an emphasis on epidermal growth factor over-expression.一项对Ⅰ期至Ⅳ期直肠癌的五年随访研究,重点是表皮生长因子过表达。
Pol J Pathol. 2021;72(2):124-129. doi: 10.5114/pjp.2021.105639.
3
P21 is not a prognostic marker for rectal cancer - five-year follow up study of rectal cancer in stages I-IV.P21并非直肠癌的预后标志物——I-IV期直肠癌的五年随访研究
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2020;24(4):247-251. doi: 10.5114/wo.2020.102632. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
4
p21, p27, cyclin D1, and p53 in rectal cancer: immunohistology with prognostic significance?直肠癌中的p21、p27、细胞周期蛋白D1和p53:具有预后意义的免疫组织化学?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2002 Jan;17(1):11-9. doi: 10.1007/s003840100333.
5
Prognostic significance of p21 and p27 protein, apoptosis, clinical and histologic factors in rectal cancer without lymph node metastases.p21和p27蛋白、细胞凋亡、临床及组织学因素在无淋巴结转移直肠癌中的预后意义
Eur Surg Res. 2002 Nov-Dec;34(6):389-96. doi: 10.1159/000065710.
6
Effect of epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation on the prognosis of pathological stage II-IIIA (8th edition TNM classification) primary lung cancer after curative surgery.表皮生长因子受体基因突变对第 8 版 TNM 分期病理Ⅱ-ⅢA 期(可切除)原发性肺癌术后预后的影响。
Lung Cancer. 2021 Dec;162:128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
7
Prognostic and predictive value of baseline and posttreatment molecular marker expression in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗治疗局部晚期直肠癌时基线及治疗后分子标志物表达的预后和预测价值
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Aug 1;68(5):1455-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.018. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
8
[Oncogenes and cancer of the larynx. EGFR, p21 ras and HPV-DNA infections].[癌基因与喉癌。表皮生长因子受体、p21 原癌基因和人乳头瘤病毒 DNA 感染]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 1995 Feb;15(1 Suppl 46):1-22.
9
The survival outcomes of patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer differ according to EGFR mutations and the P21 expression.接受手术切除的非小细胞肺癌患者的生存结果因表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变和P21表达情况而异。
Lung Cancer. 2007 Jul;57(1):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.01.027. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
10
[Clinical significance of epidermal growth factor receptor and thymidylate synthase expression in primary liver cancer].[表皮生长因子受体和胸苷酸合成酶在原发性肝癌中的表达及临床意义]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 20;26(9):666-669. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2018.09.006.

本文引用的文献

1
P21 is not a prognostic marker for rectal cancer - five-year follow up study of rectal cancer in stages I-IV.P21并非直肠癌的预后标志物——I-IV期直肠癌的五年随访研究
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2020;24(4):247-251. doi: 10.5114/wo.2020.102632. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
2
Can factors that influence nodal dissemination in patients with colorectal cancer be identified? Own experience.能否确定影响结直肠癌患者淋巴结扩散的因素?个人经验。
Prz Gastroenterol. 2020;15(3):247-252. doi: 10.5114/pg.2020.98542. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
3
[Long-Term Survival of a Patient with Advanced Recurrent Rectal Cancer Treated with a Multidisciplinary Therapy including Five Operations-A Case Report].
[一名晚期复发性直肠癌患者接受包括五次手术在内的多学科治疗后的长期生存——病例报告]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2020 Jan;47(1):114-116.
4
Mitogenome germline mutations and colorectal cancer risk in Polish population.波兰人群中的线粒体基因组种系突变与结直肠癌风险
Arch Med Sci. 2019 Jan 16;16(2):366-373. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2018.80893. eCollection 2020.
5
Impact of delay to surgery on survival in stage I-III colon cancer.Ⅰ-Ⅲ期结肠癌手术时间延迟对生存的影响。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar;46(3):455-461. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.513. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
6
Prognostic impact of preoperatively elevated and postoperatively normalized carcinoembryonic antigen levels following curative resection of stage I-III rectal cancer.根治性切除 I-III 期直肠癌术后癌胚抗原水平升高和正常化对预后的影响。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jan;9(2):653-662. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2758. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
7
How Soon Should Patients With Colon Cancer Undergo Definitive Resection?结肠癌患者应多快接受确定性切除术?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Feb;63(2):172-182. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001525.
8
Is Colorectal Cancer in Patients Younger Than 50 Years of Age the Same Disease as in Older Patients?50岁以下患者的结直肠癌与老年患者的是同一种疾病吗?
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan;19(1):192-194.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.10.028. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
9
ARHGAP24 regulates cell ability and apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells via the regulation of P53.ARHGAP24通过调控P53来调节结肠癌细胞的细胞能力和凋亡。
Oncol Lett. 2018 Sep;16(3):3517-3524. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9075. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
10
Response to 'Preoperative geriatric assessment and tailored interventions in frail older patients with colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial'.对“老年结直肠癌患者术前老年评估及个性化干预:一项随机对照试验”的回应
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Apr;20(4):350. doi: 10.1111/codi.14046.