• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围手术期手术加速康复理念对儿童急性阑尾炎手术治疗效果的系统评价与Meta分析

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of the perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery concept on the surgical treatment of acute appendicitis in children.

作者信息

Zhang Anping, Lu Hao, Chen Fangfang, Wu You, Luo Liqiong, Sun Siyi

机构信息

Anesthesia Surgery Department, Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Chengdu, China.

Children's Heart Center, Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Transl Pediatr. 2021 Nov;10(11):3034-3045. doi: 10.21037/tp-21-457.

DOI:10.21037/tp-21-457
PMID:34976769
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8649587/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), as a new concept in surgery, has dramatically changed the mode of perioperative treatment for children with acute appendicitis.

METHODS

The retrieval strategy developed by the Cochrane Collaboration was conducted using the CNKI database, Wanfang Medical Network, PubMed, EBSCO, Medline, and Cochrane database by combining subject headings and free words. A review of the randomized controlled trials on the use of the ERAS concept in the perioperative treatment of acute appendicitis in children was conducted between the establishment of the database and May 15, 2021. Keywords included enhanced recovery after surgery, fast track surgery, ERAS, FTS, child, infant, and appendicitis. The quality of the literature was evaluated according to the RevMan 5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials on ERAS in children with acute appendicitis were finally included. The heterogeneity of postoperative stay time was tested in 4 studies using continuous variables, with Chi-squared test (Chi) =221.52, degree of freedom (df) =3, I=99%>50%. An overall analysis using a random effects model showed that the ERAS group was significantly different compared to the control group [Z=5.26; mean difference (MD) =-1.65; 95% CI: -2.27 to -1.03; P<0.00001]. The heterogeneity of the readmission rate was tested in 5 studies using dichotomous variables, with Chi=5.11, df =3, I=41%<50%, P=0.91. Overall analysis using a fixed effects model showed no statistically significant difference between the ERAS group and the control group [Z=0.80; odds ratio (OR) =1.16; 95% CI: 0.81 to 1.66; P=0.42]. The heterogeneity of the recurrence rate was tested in 4 studies using dichotomous variables, with Chi=3.73, df =3, I=20%<50%, P=0.29. Overall analysis using a fixed effects model showed no statistically significant difference between the ERAS group and the control group (Z=1.14; OR =0.76; 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.22; P=0.26).

DISCUSSION

The results of the meta-analysis confirmed that perioperative application of the ERAS concept in children with acute appendicitis can promote the rehabilitation of children, reduce the postoperative stay time, and reduce the readmission rate and reoperation rate.

摘要

背景

术后加速康复(ERAS)作为外科领域的一个新概念,极大地改变了儿童急性阑尾炎围手术期的治疗模式。

方法

采用Cochrane协作网制定的检索策略,通过主题词与自由词相结合的方式,在知网数据库、万方医学网、PubMed、EBSCO、Medline及Cochrane数据库中进行检索。对数据库建立至2021年5月15日期间关于ERAS概念在儿童急性阑尾炎围手术期治疗中应用的随机对照试验进行综述。关键词包括术后加速康复、快速康复外科、ERAS、FTS、儿童、婴幼儿、阑尾炎。根据Cochrane协作网提供的RevMan 5.3软件对文献质量进行评价。

结果

最终纳入5项关于儿童急性阑尾炎ERAS的随机对照试验。4项研究采用连续变量对术后住院时间的异质性进行检验,卡方检验(Chi)=221.52,自由度(df)=3,I=99%>50%。采用随机效应模型进行的总体分析显示,ERAS组与对照组相比有显著差异[Z=5.26;平均差(MD)=-1.65;95%置信区间(CI):-2.27至-1.03;P<0.00001]。5项研究采用二分变量对再入院率的异质性进行检验,Chi=5.11,df =3,I=41%<50%,P=0.91。采用固定效应模型进行的总体分析显示,ERAS组与对照组之间无统计学显著差异[Z=0.80;比值比(OR)=1.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/3cc677871d11/tp-10-11-3034-f15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/24624189926d/tp-10-11-3034-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/d48a8ec3fb27/tp-10-11-3034-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/8c19965099fe/tp-10-11-3034-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/1530d0af1157/tp-10-11-3034-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/886dd504345b/tp-10-11-3034-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/745e832617b3/tp-10-11-3034-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/c84725b1bb5f/tp-10-11-3034-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/284aaf812c59/tp-10-11-3034-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/d754d031f92d/tp-10-11-3034-f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/418317e50d2d/tp-10-11-3034-f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/a36621ddfddf/tp-10-11-3034-f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/e504b6cde9af/tp-10-11-3034-f12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/6c1f18216d07/tp-10-11-3034-f13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/d0049af68112/tp-10-11-3034-f14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/3cc677871d11/tp-10-11-3034-f15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/24624189926d/tp-10-11-3034-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/d48a8ec3fb27/tp-10-11-3034-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/8c19965099fe/tp-10-11-3034-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/1530d0af1157/tp-10-11-3034-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/886dd504345b/tp-10-11-3034-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/745e832617b3/tp-10-11-3034-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/c84725b1bb5f/tp-10-11-3034-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/284aaf812c59/tp-10-11-3034-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/d754d031f92d/tp-10-11-3034-f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/418317e50d2d/tp-10-11-3034-f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/a36621ddfddf/tp-10-11-3034-f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/e504b6cde9af/tp-10-11-3034-f12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/6c1f18216d07/tp-10-11-3034-f13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/d0049af68112/tp-10-11-3034-f14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1b/8649587/3cc677871d11/tp-10-11-3034-f15.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of the perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery concept on the surgical treatment of acute appendicitis in children.围手术期手术加速康复理念对儿童急性阑尾炎手术治疗效果的系统评价与Meta分析
Transl Pediatr. 2021 Nov;10(11):3034-3045. doi: 10.21037/tp-21-457.
2
[Meta-analysis on safety of application of enhanced recovery after surgery to laparoscopic bariatric surgery].[术后加速康复应用于腹腔镜减重手术安全性的Meta分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Oct 25;21(10):1167-1174.
3
Effect of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on recovery after laparoscopic myomectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术后加速康复方案对腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术后恢复的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gland Surg. 2022 May;11(5):837-846. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-168.
4
The Safety and Feasibility of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: An Updated Meta-Analysis.接受胰十二指肠切除术患者的术后强化康复安全性和可行性:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 May 8;2020:7401276. doi: 10.1155/2020/7401276. eCollection 2020.
5
Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery.结直肠手术的快速康复外科与传统恢复策略对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16(2):CD007635. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007635.pub2.
6
Enhanced Recovery Pathways Versus Standard Care After Cystectomy: A Meta-analysis of the Effect on Perioperative Outcomes.膀胱切除术后强化康复路径与标准护理的比较:对围手术期结局影响的荟萃分析
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):995-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.031. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
7
Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional perioperative care in laparoscopic hepatectomy: A meta-analysis.手术康复计划与传统围手术期护理在腹腔镜肝切除术中的对比:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):274-282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.017. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
8
Should enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways be preferred over standard practice for patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.对于接受腹壁重建手术的患者,手术加速康复(ERAS)路径是否优于标准治疗方案?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2021 Apr;25(2):501-521. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02262-y. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
9
Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols versus standard of care on perioperative outcomes of radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.手术加速康复方案与标准治疗对根治性膀胱切除术围手术期结局的影响:一项比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019 Aug;71(4):309-323. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03376-9. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
10
Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery or fast track surgery pathways in minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术加速康复或快速康复路径在微创根治性前列腺切除术中的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Jun;9(3):1037-1052. doi: 10.21037/tau-19-884.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysing YouTube as a health resource: quality and reliability of videos on pediatric appendicitis.将YouTube作为一种健康资源进行分析:关于小儿阑尾炎视频的质量与可靠性
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 30;25(1):1229. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07869-2.
2
Clinical effect of fast-track surgery on laparoscopic treatment of pediatric acute appendicitis and its effect on abdominal inflammation and stress level.快速康复外科在小儿急性阑尾炎腹腔镜治疗中的临床效果及其对腹部炎症和应激水平的影响。
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Jul;41(7):2060-2065. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.7.11153.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing the Postoperative Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Three Port Appendectomy With Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Acute Appendicitis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.比较单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与三孔阑尾切除术在急性阑尾炎术后采用加速康复外科方案的术后结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Coloproctol. 2021 Aug;37(4):232-238. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.09.15. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
Mitigating disparity in children with acute appendicitis: Impact of patient-driven protocols.缓解小儿急性阑尾炎的差异:以患者为导向的方案的影响。
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Apr;56(4):663-667. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
3
Appendectomy or Not? An Update on the Evidence for Antibiotics Only Versus Surgery for the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis in Children.
是否进行阑尾切除术?儿童急性阑尾炎仅用抗生素治疗与手术治疗的证据更新
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Jul;36(7):347-352. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002157.
4
Salivary biomarker for acute appendicitis in children: a pilot study.儿童急性阑尾炎的唾液生物标志物:一项试点研究。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2020 May;36(5):621-627. doi: 10.1007/s00383-020-04645-9. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
5
Core outcome set for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children and young people.儿童和青少年单纯性急性阑尾炎的核心结局集。
Br J Surg. 2020 Jul;107(8):1013-1022. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11508. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
6
An Enhanced Recovery Protocol that Facilitates Same-day Discharge for Simple Laparoscopic Appendectomies.一种促进简单腹腔镜阑尾切除术当日出院的强化康复方案。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2019 Dec 5;4(6):e243. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000243. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
7
Nonoperative Treatment Versus Appendectomy for Acute Nonperforated Appendicitis in Children: Five-year Follow Up of a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.非手术治疗与阑尾切除术治疗儿童急性非穿孔阑尾炎的对比:一项随机对照试验的 5 年随访结果。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jun;271(6):1030-1035. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003646.
8
Evaluation of concordance among surgeons and pathologists regarding the diagnosis and classification of acute appendicitis in children.评估外科医生和病理学家在儿童急性阑尾炎的诊断和分类方面的一致性。
J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Aug;55(8):1503-1506. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.09.025. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
9
Accuracy of unenhanced, non-sedated MRI in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children.非增强、非镇静 MRI 在儿童急性阑尾炎诊断中的准确性。
J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Feb;55(2):253-256. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.10.039. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
10
Usefulness of the pediatric appendicitis score for assessing the severity of acute appendicitis in children.小儿阑尾炎评分在评估儿童急性阑尾炎严重程度方面的实用性。
Pediatr Int. 2020 Jan;62(1):70-73. doi: 10.1111/ped.14032.