Tyson Mark D, Chang Sam S
Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):995-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.031. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to improve surgical outcomes by reducing variation in perioperative best practices. However, among published studies, results show a striking variation in the effect of ERAS pathways on perioperative outcomes after cystectomy.
To perform a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of ERAS versus standard care on perioperative outcomes after cystectomy.
We performed a literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, and the health-related grey literature in February 2016 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and the Cochrane Handbook. Studies were reviewed according to criteria from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Thirteen studies (1493 total patients) met the inclusion criteria (ERAS: 801, standard care: 692). A pooled meta-analysis of all comparative studies was performed using inverse-weighted, fixed-effects models, and random-effects models. Publication bias was graphically assessed using contour-enhanced funnel plots and was formally tested using the Harbord modification of the Egger test.
Pooled data showed a lower overall complication rate (risk ratio [RR]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.97, p = 0.017, I=35.6%), a shorter length of stay (standardized mean difference:-0.87, 95% CI: -1.31 to -0.42, p=0.001, I=92.8%), and a faster return of bowel function (standardized mean difference: -1.02, 95% CI: -1.69 to -0.34, p=0.003, I=92.2%) in the ERAS group. No difference was noted for the overall readmission rates (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.39-1.41, p=0.36, I=51.4%), although a stratified analysis showed a lower 30-d readmission rate in the ERAS group (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19-0.83, p=0.015, I=0%).
ERAS protocols reduce the length of stay, time-to-bowel function, and rate of complications after cystectomy.
Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways for cystectomy reduce complications and the amount of time patients spend in the hospital.
术后加速康复(ERAS)方案旨在通过减少围手术期最佳实践的差异来改善手术效果。然而,在已发表的研究中,结果显示ERAS方案对膀胱切除术后围手术期结局的影响存在显著差异。
对文献进行系统综述和荟萃分析,比较ERAS与标准护理对膀胱切除术后围手术期结局的有效性。
我们于2016年2月根据系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目以及Cochrane手册,对PubMed、EMBASE、科学网、谷歌学术、Cochrane图书馆和与健康相关的灰色文献进行了文献检索。根据牛津循证医学中心的标准对研究进行评审。13项研究(共1493例患者)符合纳入标准(ERAS组:801例,标准护理组:692例)。使用逆加权固定效应模型和随机效应模型对所有比较研究进行汇总荟萃分析。使用等高线增强漏斗图以图形方式评估发表偏倚,并使用Egger检验的Harbord修正进行正式检验。
汇总数据显示,ERAS组的总体并发症发生率较低(风险比[RR]:0.85,95%置信区间[CI]:0.74 - 0.97,p = 0.017,I² = 35.6%),住院时间较短(标准化均差:-0.87,95% CI:-1.31至-0.42,p = 0.001,I² = 92.8%),肠功能恢复更快(标准化均差:-1.02,95% CI:-1.69至-0.34,p = 0.003,I² = 92.2%)。总体再入院率无差异(RR:0.74, 95% CI:0.39 - 1.41,p = 0.36,I² = 51.4%),尽管分层分析显示ERAS组的30天再入院率较低(RR:0.39,95% CI:0.19 - 0.83,p = 0.015,I² = 0%)。
ERAS方案可缩短膀胱切除术后的住院时间、肠功能恢复时间并降低并发症发生率。
膀胱切除术后的术后加速康复方案可减少并发症以及患者的住院时间。