Suppr超能文献

膀胱切除术后强化康复路径与标准护理的比较:对围手术期结局影响的荟萃分析

Enhanced Recovery Pathways Versus Standard Care After Cystectomy: A Meta-analysis of the Effect on Perioperative Outcomes.

作者信息

Tyson Mark D, Chang Sam S

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):995-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.031. Epub 2016 Jun 11.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to improve surgical outcomes by reducing variation in perioperative best practices. However, among published studies, results show a striking variation in the effect of ERAS pathways on perioperative outcomes after cystectomy.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of ERAS versus standard care on perioperative outcomes after cystectomy.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, and the health-related grey literature in February 2016 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and the Cochrane Handbook. Studies were reviewed according to criteria from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Thirteen studies (1493 total patients) met the inclusion criteria (ERAS: 801, standard care: 692). A pooled meta-analysis of all comparative studies was performed using inverse-weighted, fixed-effects models, and random-effects models. Publication bias was graphically assessed using contour-enhanced funnel plots and was formally tested using the Harbord modification of the Egger test.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Pooled data showed a lower overall complication rate (risk ratio [RR]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.97, p = 0.017, I=35.6%), a shorter length of stay (standardized mean difference:-0.87, 95% CI: -1.31 to -0.42, p=0.001, I=92.8%), and a faster return of bowel function (standardized mean difference: -1.02, 95% CI: -1.69 to -0.34, p=0.003, I=92.2%) in the ERAS group. No difference was noted for the overall readmission rates (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.39-1.41, p=0.36, I=51.4%), although a stratified analysis showed a lower 30-d readmission rate in the ERAS group (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19-0.83, p=0.015, I=0%).

CONCLUSIONS

ERAS protocols reduce the length of stay, time-to-bowel function, and rate of complications after cystectomy.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways for cystectomy reduce complications and the amount of time patients spend in the hospital.

摘要

背景

术后加速康复(ERAS)方案旨在通过减少围手术期最佳实践的差异来改善手术效果。然而,在已发表的研究中,结果显示ERAS方案对膀胱切除术后围手术期结局的影响存在显著差异。

目的

对文献进行系统综述和荟萃分析,比较ERAS与标准护理对膀胱切除术后围手术期结局的有效性。

证据获取

我们于2016年2月根据系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目以及Cochrane手册,对PubMed、EMBASE、科学网、谷歌学术、Cochrane图书馆和与健康相关的灰色文献进行了文献检索。根据牛津循证医学中心的标准对研究进行评审。13项研究(共1493例患者)符合纳入标准(ERAS组:801例,标准护理组:692例)。使用逆加权固定效应模型和随机效应模型对所有比较研究进行汇总荟萃分析。使用等高线增强漏斗图以图形方式评估发表偏倚,并使用Egger检验的Harbord修正进行正式检验。

证据综合

汇总数据显示,ERAS组的总体并发症发生率较低(风险比[RR]:0.85,95%置信区间[CI]:0.74 - 0.97,p = 0.017,I² = 35.6%),住院时间较短(标准化均差:-0.87,95% CI:-1.31至-0.42,p = 0.001,I² = 92.8%),肠功能恢复更快(标准化均差:-1.02,95% CI:-1.69至-0.34,p = 0.003,I² = 92.2%)。总体再入院率无差异(RR:0.74, 95% CI:0.39 - 1.41,p = 0.36,I² = 51.4%),尽管分层分析显示ERAS组的30天再入院率较低(RR:0.39,95% CI:0.19 - 0.83,p = 0.015,I² = 0%)。

结论

ERAS方案可缩短膀胱切除术后的住院时间、肠功能恢复时间并降低并发症发生率。

患者总结

膀胱切除术后的术后加速康复方案可减少并发症以及患者的住院时间。

相似文献

2
Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for women with gynaecological cancers.妇科癌症患者的围手术期强化康复方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 15;3(3):CD008239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub5.
3
Alvimopan for recovery of bowel function after radical cystectomy.阿维莫潘用于根治性膀胱切除术后肠功能恢复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 2;5(5):CD012111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012111.pub2.
6
8
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.

引用本文的文献

4
The Use of Clinical Pathways in Emergency Departments: A Scoping Review.急诊科临床路径的应用:一项范围综述
Health Serv Insights. 2025 May 7;18:11786329251328527. doi: 10.1177/11786329251328527. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验