Suppr超能文献

比较两种硬化治疗食管静脉曲张注射技术的前瞻性随机试验:套扎管法和徒手法。

Prospective randomized trial comparing two injection techniques for sclerosing oesophageal varices: over-tube and free-hand.

作者信息

Kitano S, Koyanagi N, Iso Y, Iwanaga T, Higashi H, Sugimachi K

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1987 Jul;74(7):603-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800740721.

Abstract

The safety, efficacy and complications of two techniques of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy were examined in 102 consecutive patients, using either a totally transparent over-tube or the free-hand technique. The choice of treatment was at random. There was a significantly higher control of variceal bleeding when the over-tube technique was used (100 per cent versus 77 per cent, P less than 0.05). The frequency of re-bleeding before the eradication of oesophageal varices was significantly less in the over-tube group than in the free-hand group (P less than 0.01), although all re-bleedings were well controlled with additional injections of 5 per cent ethanolamine oleate. There was no significant difference between the two techniques with regard to the frequency of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for eradication of oesophageal varices. The over-tube technique is safer than the free-hand technique and takes less time to accomplish; at the initial session of treatment, time and bleeding during these techniques were 11.5 +/- 2.3 min (mean +/- s.d.) and 7.3 +/- 5.9 ml in the over-tube technique, and 20.4 +/- 4.1 min and 45.1 +/- 30.0 ml in the free-hand technique (P less than 0.001, in both time and bleeding).

摘要

采用全透明外套管技术或徒手技术,对102例连续患者进行了两种内镜注射硬化疗法的安全性、有效性及并发症研究。治疗方法随机选择。使用外套管技术时,静脉曲张出血的控制率显著更高(100%对77%,P<0.05)。在外套管组,食管静脉曲张根除前再出血的频率显著低于徒手组(P<0.01),尽管所有再出血均通过额外注射5%油酸乙醇胺得到良好控制。两种技术在根除食管静脉曲张的内镜注射硬化疗法频率方面无显著差异。外套管技术比徒手技术更安全,完成时间更短;在治疗初始阶段,外套管技术的操作时间和出血量分别为11.5±2.3分钟(均值±标准差)和7.3±5.9毫升,徒手技术分别为20.4±4.1分钟和45.1±30.0毫升(时间和出血量方面P均<0.001)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验