Suppr超能文献

食管横断术与注射硬化疗法治疗高危患者食管静脉曲张出血的比较

Esophageal transection versus injection sclerotherapy in the management of bleeding esophageal varices in patients at high risk.

作者信息

Huizinga W K, Angorn I B, Baker L W

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985 Jun;160(6):539-46.

PMID:3873713
Abstract

In a prospective randomized trial of 76 patients at high risk with bleeding esophageal varices, transection of the esophagus with the EEA stapling apparatus was compared with injection sclerotherapy in the management of patients with Child's class B and C liver status. Thirty-nine patients underwent transection and 37 patients, sclerotherapy with a total of 92 injection procedures (2.4 per patient). The perioperative mortality (less than 30 days) was 28.9 per cent overall; 33.3 per cent for esophageal transection and 24.3 per cent for injection sclerotherapy (chi 2 = 0.375, p greater than 0.05). Gross ascites, severe encephalopathy and emergency operations were associated with a high mortality in the transection group, but other risk factors such as age and hypersplenism did not influence the outcome in either group. Only patients in Child's class C died after transection, but patients who died in the sclerotherapy group (mainly from recurrent bleeding) included patients from both Child's class B and C. Early recurrence of nonfatal bleeding affected one of 39 patients (2.5 per cent) after transection but was evident in 18 of 37 patients (48.6 per cent) after sclerotherapy (chi 2 = 19.12, p greater than 0.0005) and six patients died. Hemorrhage did not recur after transection during a follow-up period of two years, but a further 22 episodes of bleeding were recorded in 13 patients receiving sclerotherapy with five deaths. Postoperative complications and long term morbidity were similar in the two groups. Including readmissions for bleeding and repeat procedures, the mean hospital stay per patient was shorter for transection (14.5 versus 19.1 days) and the requirements for blood were less (1.9 units per patient versus 3.6 units per patient) than for sclerotherapy. It is concluded that esophageal transection effectively protects against short term recurrence of bleeding. Preoperative control of gross ascites will further reduce the mortality and comatose patients should be excluded from operation. Sclerotherapy provides little if any protection against recurrent bleeding and its use in the management of variceal hemorrhage in patients with advanced liver disease remains questionable. It is recommended as a temporary measure in patients at high risk until such time that more effective surgical treatment can be performed.

摘要

在一项针对76例食管静脉曲张出血高危患者的前瞻性随机试验中,将使用EEA吻合器进行食管横断术与注射硬化疗法用于Child B级和C级肝病患者的治疗进行了比较。39例患者接受了横断术,37例患者接受了硬化疗法,共进行了92次注射操作(每位患者2.4次)。围手术期死亡率(不到30天)总体为28.9%;食管横断术组为33.3%,注射硬化疗法组为24.3%(卡方检验=0.375,p>0.05)。大量腹水、严重脑病和急诊手术与横断术组的高死亡率相关,但年龄和脾功能亢进等其他危险因素对两组的结果均无影响。只有Child C级的患者在横断术后死亡,但硬化疗法组死亡的患者(主要死于再出血)包括Child B级和C级的患者。非致命性出血的早期复发在横断术后39例患者中有1例(2.5%)出现,但在硬化疗法后37例患者中有18例(48.6%)出现(卡方检验=19.12,p<0.0005),6例患者死亡。横断术后在两年的随访期内出血未复发,但在接受硬化疗法的13例患者中又记录到22次出血发作,5例死亡。两组的术后并发症和长期发病率相似。包括因出血再次入院和重复操作,横断术组每位患者的平均住院时间较短(14.5天对19.1天),输血需求量也较少(每位患者1.9单位对3.6单位)。结论是食管横断术能有效预防短期出血复发。术前控制大量腹水将进一步降低死亡率,昏迷患者应排除在手术之外。硬化疗法对预防再出血几乎没有作用,其在晚期肝病患者静脉曲张出血治疗中的应用仍存在疑问。建议作为高危患者的临时措施,直到能够进行更有效的手术治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验