• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者中超保守 ICD 编程的影响:避免潜在的不必要的心动过速治疗。

Impact of ultra-conservative ICD programming in patients with LVADs: Avoiding potentially unnecessary tachy-therapies.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Feb;45(2):204-211. doi: 10.1111/pace.14438. Epub 2022 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1111/pace.14438
PMID:34978089
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) often tolerate ventricular arrhythmias (VA). We aim to assess the frequency and outcomes of ICD therapies averted by ultraconservative ICD programming (UCP) in LVAD patients.

METHODS

This single center, retrospective cohort study included patients with LVADs and ICDs implanted from 2015 to 2019 that had UCP. The aim for UCP was to maximally delay VA treatments and maximize anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) prior to ICD shocks. VA events were reviewed after UCP and evaluated under prior conservative programming to assess for potentially averted events (that would have resulted in either ATP or defibrillation with prior programming).

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included in the study with follow-up of median 16 ± 10.2 months after UCP. The median time from LVAD implantation to reprogramming was 7 days (IQR 5-9 days). Fourteen patients (28%) had potentially averted VA events that would have been treated with their prior ICD programming (82 total events, median two events per patient, IQR 1-10 events). Treated VA events occurred in 15 patients (30%). Eleven of the 14 patients with potentially averted VAs had treated events as well. Only one patient reported definitive symptoms of self-limited "dizziness" during a potentially averted event that did not result in hospitalization. No patients died of complications from or needed emergent care/hospitalization due a potentially averted VA.

CONCLUSIONS

UCP in LVAD patients likely prevented unnecessary VA treatments in many patients with minimal reported symptoms during these potentially averted events. Prospective studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

摘要

背景

植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的患者通常能耐受室性心律失常(VA)。我们旨在评估超保守 ICD 程控(UCP)避免 LVAD 患者 ICD 治疗的频率和结果。

方法

这是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2015 年至 2019 年植入 LVAD 和 ICD 且进行 UCP 的患者。UCP 的目的是最大限度地延迟 VA 治疗,并在 ICD 电击前最大限度地增加抗心动过速起搏(ATP)。在 UCP 后回顾 VA 事件,并根据先前的保守编程进行评估,以评估潜在的可避免事件(这将导致先前编程的 ATP 或除颤)。

结果

研究纳入了 50 例患者,UCP 后中位随访 16 ± 10.2 个月。从 LVAD 植入到重新编程的中位时间为 7 天(IQR 5-9 天)。14 例患者(28%)有潜在的可避免 VA 事件,这些事件将通过其先前的 ICD 编程进行治疗(共 82 例事件,中位数每位患者 2 例,IQR 1-10 例事件)。15 例患者出现了治疗 VA 事件。14 例有潜在可避免 VA 的患者中有 11 例出现了治疗事件。只有 1 例患者报告在潜在可避免事件中出现了明确的自限性“头晕”症状,但未导致住院。没有患者因潜在可避免的 VA 并发症死亡,也不需要紧急护理/住院治疗。

结论

在 LVAD 患者中,UCP 可能在许多患者中避免了不必要的 VA 治疗,且在这些潜在可避免的事件中报告的症状很少。需要前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。

相似文献

1
Impact of ultra-conservative ICD programming in patients with LVADs: Avoiding potentially unnecessary tachy-therapies.左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者中超保守 ICD 编程的影响:避免潜在的不必要的心动过速治疗。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Feb;45(2):204-211. doi: 10.1111/pace.14438. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
2
Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Programming in Patients With a Left Ventricular Assist Device.前瞻性随机评估左心室辅助装置患者植入式心脏复律除颤器的程控。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 23;7(5):e007748. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007748.
3
Ventricular arrhythmias and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: need for primary prevention?持续性左心室辅助装置患者的室性心律失常和植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗:是否需要一级预防?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 25;61(25):2542-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.020. Epub 2013 May 2.
4
ICD lead parameters, performance, and adverse events following continuous-flow LVAD implantation.连续流左心室辅助装置植入后的ICD导线参数、性能及不良事件
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Apr;37(4):464-72. doi: 10.1111/pace.12290. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
5
Electromagnetic interference from left ventricular assist devices in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.左心室辅助装置对皮下植入式心律转复除颤器患者的电磁干扰。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 May;31(5):1195-1201. doi: 10.1111/jce.14431. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
6
Managing ventricular arrhythmias and implantable cardiac defibrillator shocks after left ventricular assist device implantation.管理左心室辅助装置植入后的室性心律失常和植入式心脏除颤器电击。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 Mar;35(3):592-600. doi: 10.1111/jce.16142. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
7
Impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.心脏再同步治疗对持续血流左心室辅助装置患者临床结局的影响。
J Card Fail. 2015 Mar;21(3):226-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2014.12.006. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
8
ICD shocks in LVAD patients are not associated with increased subsequent mortality risk.左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者发生植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)电击与后续死亡风险增加无关。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Dec;56(3):341-348. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00619-7. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
9
Impact of QRS Duration and Ventricular Pacing on Clinical and Arrhythmic Outcomes in Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: A Multicenter Study.连续血流左心室辅助装置受者 QRS 持续时间和心室起搏对临床和心律失常结局的影响:一项多中心研究。
J Card Fail. 2019 May;25(5):355-363. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
10
Use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with left ventricular assist devices.左心室辅助装置患者中植入式心脏复律除颤器的应用。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Jul;14(7):696-702. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs062. Epub 2012 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Sympathectomy in refractory ventricular arrhythmias in patients with left ventricular assist device: a grand round case report.左心室辅助装置患者难治性室性心律失常的交感神经切除术:一例临床病例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2025 Aug 31;9(9):ytaf378. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytaf378. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Ventricular Arrhythmias in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients-Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Considerations.左心室辅助装置患者的室性心律失常——当前的诊断和治疗考虑因素。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 8;24(4):1124. doi: 10.3390/s24041124.