Scottish National Advanced Heart Failure Service, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, Glasgow G81 4DY, UK.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Jul;14(7):696-702. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs062. Epub 2012 Apr 29.
Patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are at high risk of sustained ventricular arrhythmias, but these may be remarkably well tolerated and the association with sudden death is unclear. Many patients who receive an LVAD already have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). While it is standard practice to reactivate a previously implanted ICD in an LVAD recipient, this should include discussion of the revised risks and benefits of ICD therapy following LVAD implantation. In particular, patients should be warned that they might receive a significant number of ICD shocks that may not be life saving. When ICDs are reactivated, device programming should minimize the risk of repeated shocks for non-sustained or well-tolerated ventricular arrhythmias. Implantation of a primary prevention ICD after implantation of an LVAD is not supported by current evidence, poses potential risks, and should be the subject of a clinical trial before it becomes standard practice.
装有左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的患者有发生持续性室性心律失常的高风险,但这些心律失常可能被很好地耐受,与猝死的关联尚不清楚。许多接受 LVAD 的患者已经植入了植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)。虽然在 LVAD 受者中重新激活先前植入的 ICD 是标准做法,但这应包括讨论 LVAD 植入后 ICD 治疗的修订风险和益处。特别是,应警告患者,他们可能会收到大量 ICD 电击,这些电击可能无法挽救生命。当重新激活 ICD 时,设备编程应将非持续性或耐受性良好的室性心律失常的重复电击风险降至最低。LVAD 植入后植入初级预防 ICD 目前没有证据支持,存在潜在风险,在成为标准做法之前,应该进行临床试验。