Department of Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, People's Republic of China.
Department of Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Environmental Safety of Zhejiang Province, 310020, People's Republic of China.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 25;814:152750. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152750. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
Bioleaching is considered a promising technology for remediating heavy metals pollution in sediments. During bioleaching, the pressure from the metals bioleached is more likely to cause the spread of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). The changes in abundance of ARGs in two typical heavy metal bioleaching treatments using indigenous bacteria or functional bacteria agent were compared in this study. Results showed that both treatments successfully bioleached heavy metals, with a higher removal ratio of Cu with functional bacteria agent. The absolute abundances of most ARGs decreased by one log unit after bioleaching, particularly tetR (p = 0.02) and tetX (p = 0.04), and intI1 decreased from 10 to 10 copies/g. As for the relative abundance, ARGs in the non-agent treatment increased from 3.90 × 10 to 1.67 × 10 copies/16S rRNA gene copies (p = 0.01), and in the treatment with agent, it reached 6.65 × 10 copies/16S rRNA gene copies, and intI1 relative abundance was maintained at 10 copies/16S rRNA gene copies. The relative abundance of ARGs associated with efflux pump mechanism and ribosomal protection mechanism increased the most. The co-occurrence network indicated that Cu bioleached was the environmental factor determining the distribution of ARGs, Firmicutes might be the potential hosts of ARGs. Compared to bioleaching with indigenous bacteria, the addition of functional bacteria agent engendered a decrease in microbial alpha diversity and an increase in the amount of Cu bioleached, resulting in a higher relative abundance of ARGs. Heavy metal pollution can be effectively removed from sediments using the two bioleaching treatments, however, the risk of ARGs propagation posed by those procedures should be considered, especially the treatment with functional bacteria agents. In the future, an economical and efficient green technology that simultaneously reduces both the absolute abundance and relative abundance of ARGs should be developed.
生物淋滤被认为是一种很有前途的修复沉积物中重金属污染的技术。在生物淋滤过程中,被淋滤的金属的压力更有可能导致抗生素耐药基因(ARGs)的传播。本研究比较了两种典型的重金属生物淋滤处理(使用土著细菌或功能细菌剂)中 ARGs 丰度的变化。结果表明,两种处理都成功地生物淋滤了重金属,其中功能细菌剂处理对 Cu 的去除率更高。生物淋滤后,大多数 ARGs 的绝对丰度下降了一个对数单位,特别是 tetR(p=0.02)和 tetX(p=0.04),而 intI1 从 10 降至 10 拷贝/g。就相对丰度而言,非制剂处理中的 ARGs 从 3.90×10 增加到 1.67×10 拷贝/16S rRNA 基因拷贝(p=0.01),而制剂处理中则达到 6.65×10 拷贝/16S rRNA 基因拷贝,并且 intI1 的相对丰度保持在 10 拷贝/16S rRNA 基因拷贝。与外排泵机制和核糖体保护机制相关的 ARGs 的相对丰度增加最多。共现网络表明,Cu 的生物淋滤是决定 ARGs 分布的环境因素,厚壁菌门可能是 ARGs 的潜在宿主。与使用土著细菌的生物淋滤相比,添加功能细菌剂会降低微生物的 α 多样性并增加 Cu 的生物淋滤量,从而导致 ARGs 的相对丰度增加。这两种生物淋滤处理都可以有效地从沉积物中去除重金属污染,但应考虑这些过程中 ARGs 传播的风险,特别是使用功能细菌剂的处理。未来,应开发一种经济高效的绿色技术,同时降低 ARGs 的绝对丰度和相对丰度。